Platform: NinjaTrader (It's a love/hate relationship)
Favorite Futures: CL, TF, 6E
Posts: 176 since May 2010
Thanks: 60 given,
It's very tempting, but from past history, I'm vary cautious.
The biggest complaints with his old ATO method was that he seemed to produce his results in hindsight. Many members complained that he claimed to get targets filled when nobody else did. They complained he miraculously took full profit on many days where the market only moved enough to fill the first target, but somehow managed to let 1/2 run on only the days where the second target was actually achieved.
I don't know first hand if the complaints are valid or if it is just collective whining from sore losers, but if you keep hearing the same story over and over, it makes one pessimistic.
The following user says Thank You to Slipknot511 for this post:
I would stay away. I had his course ATO and after a short time, it was very clear to me that he was posting a fake track trecord. Just like Slipknot mentioned, on some days he took full profits on the first target and on some others where the second target was hit, he got out there. I was actually wondering why he didnt skip the first profit target and just got out at the second "since he was so good at knowing where the market would go!"
The following user says Thank You to Swisstrader1 for this post: