TopstepTrader's Michael Patak (Founder) - Ask Me Anything (AMA) - Vendors and Product Reviews | futures.io
futures io futures trading


TopstepTrader's Michael Patak (Founder) - Ask Me Anything (AMA)
Started: by Big Mike Views / Replies:126,228 / 933
Last Reply: Attachments:19

Welcome to futures io.

Welcome, Guest!

This forum was established to help traders (especially futures traders) by openly sharing indicators, strategies, methods, trading journals and discussing the psychology of trading.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading forums:
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive on our forums.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendor advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in openness and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, it is not something tangible you can download.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.


You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free and simple, and we will never resell your private information.

-- Big Mike

Reply
 19  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

TopstepTrader's Michael Patak (Founder) - Ask Me Anything (AMA)

  #491 (permalink)
 Vendor: diversifyportfolio.com 
PTA, Gauteng
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Self built + Sierra + TWS
Favorite Futures: Stocks and Options
 
DarkPoolTrading's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,027 since May 2012
Thanks: 1,194 given, 1,280 received


t0030tr View Post
I don't think that is the case Lemons. The way to trade for TST remains the same always. Remain profitable.

No unfortunately that is not correct. The rules do change and they severely hurt traders who trade the continuous combine the way it is meant to be traded (ie: base hits over a long period of time not looking for quick profits and home runs).

This was detailed here:
https://futures.io/vendors-product-reviews/25776-topsteptrader-s-michael-patak-p...thing-46.html#post474180

TST promised to review this rule but it seems their business model simply works too well to change.

If you're someone doing a continuous combine and do not complete it in 10 days, then both LTP and the first 10 days of live trading set you up for failure.

In my honest opinion, the continuous combine is a farce. Either ensure you can pass the combine in 10 days (thus allowing you to trade in the same manner during LTP and live). Or simply use the continuous combine as a place to learn and leave it at that.

Diversification is the only free lunch

Last edited by DarkPoolTrading; March 27th, 2015 at 02:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
 
  #492 (permalink)
Elite Member
Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT7 w/EW and MG
Favorite Futures: CL and ES (sometimes)
 
Posts: 35 since Jun 2013
Thanks: 14 given, 20 received


DarkPoolTrading View Post
No unfortunately that is not correct. The rules do change and they severely hurt traders who trade the continuous combine the way it is meant to be traded (ie: base hits over a long period of time not looking for quick profits and home runs).

This was detailed here:
https://futures.io/vendors-product-reviews/25776-topsteptrader-s-michael-patak-p...thing-46.html#post474180

TST promised to review this rule but it seems their business model simply works too well to change.

If you're someone doing a continuous combine and do not complete it in 10 days, then both LTP and the first 10 days of live trading set you up for failure.

In my honest opinion, the continuous combine is a farce. Either ensure you can pass the combine in 10 days (thus allowing you to trade in the same manner during LTP and live). Or simply use the continuous combine as a place to learn and leave it at that.


Apologies Dark Pool, I did not consider the combine in this context. For me it is the revere I guess. I have struggled to get to the end of 10 days. For myself it has been a complete dismissal of the daily draw down as I have been solely focused on the process. Not being able to hit target in ten days would completely elude me personally. I suppose I did not think of the combine in the context that it was considered for originally. For me it was something else, meaning having the ability to restart on failure at a lower cost until I could master the process.

Reply With Quote
 
  #493 (permalink)
Elite Member
Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT7 w/EW and MG
Favorite Futures: CL and ES (sometimes)
 
Posts: 35 since Jun 2013
Thanks: 14 given, 20 received



lemons View Post
No.

Combine is continues but LTP is fix to 10 trading days.
Lets say in Continues Combine your average day is 50 $.
Lets say you keep the same average 50 $ day then with
10 days you make 500 $ but passing the LTP you need to
make depending of Combine. 30'000 LTP target is 750 $
50'000 LTP target is 1500$.

You can be successful in many Combines but you can never
pass the LTP with 50 $ daily average.

Perhaps TST is seeking people who intend to trade professionally. Based on that number, a person would never be considered a professional trader. I suppose this might be a lot of money in some places of the world, but here in the US, it would probably not seem a worthwhile en devour to an equity partner.

Reply With Quote
 
  #494 (permalink)
Elite Member
Des Moines, Iowa
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: Ninja, TOS
Broker/Data: AMP/CQG, TOS
Favorite Futures: CL, TF, GC
 
madLyfe's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,638 since Feb 2011
Thanks: 9,214 given, 1,008 received


DarkPoolTrading View Post
No unfortunately that is not correct. The rules do change and they severely hurt traders who trade the continuous combine the way it is meant to be traded (ie: base hits over a long period of time not looking for quick profits and home runs).

This was detailed here:
https://futures.io/vendors-product-reviews/25776-topsteptrader-s-michael-patak-p...thing-46.html#post474180

TST promised to review this rule but it seems their business model simply works too well to change.

If you're someone doing a continuous combine and do not complete it in 10 days, then both LTP and the first 10 days of live trading set you up for failure.

In my honest opinion, the continuous combine is a farce. Either ensure you can pass the combine in 10 days (thus allowing you to trade in the same manner during LTP and live). Or simply use the continuous combine as a place to learn and leave it at that.

you have 60 days to complete LTP. your trailing drawdown gets moved up after 10 trading days. I don't see the issue here. @lemons keeps using a low average daily profit as an example of how moving that drawdown is unfair. I don't see it that way. I see this as a business on both sides. they provide the ability for people with the ability to trade profitably the chance to get funding if that is not possible themselves. they also are in the business of making money. there are good days and bad days in trading but if someone told me that I could only make a 50avg/day for the rest of my trading career, I wouldn't continue.

dont believe anything you hear and only half of what you see

\_(ツ)_/

(╯□)╯︵ ┻━┻
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to madLyfe for this post:
 
  #495 (permalink)
 Vendor: diversifyportfolio.com 
PTA, Gauteng
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Self built + Sierra + TWS
Favorite Futures: Stocks and Options
 
DarkPoolTrading's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,027 since May 2012
Thanks: 1,194 given, 1,280 received

Futures Edge on FIO

What value do you place on the webinars on FIO?

 

madLyfe View Post
you have 60 days to complete LTP. your trailing drawdown gets moved up after 10 trading days. I don't see the issue here.

The issue is described in detail in the link I posted. But to summarize:

Lets say a trader does the 50k continuous combine and takes 3 months to complete it. That means it took him 3 months to make $3K. If that trader moves to the next stages he is expected to build a big enough cushion in 10 days such that the trailing drawdown can be moved up and he has to rely on whatever profit he has made in 10 days.

You are asking someone who took 3 months to make $3k to all of a sudden change the way he trades because of an arbitrary 10 days. Simply put, if the combine is continuous, so should ltp and live.

The very nature of the continuous combine (the way it is marketed to the public) is that you don't have to rush. It attracts traders with this mindset and style of trading. Yet when they pass, all of a sudden an arbitrary 10 day deadline is placed on them.

Anyway, I will refrain from rehashing the issue because it seems nothing will be done about this and I no longer participate in the combine anyway. Just thought I would post the link since it was relevant to the discussion.

Diversification is the only free lunch
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to DarkPoolTrading for this post:
 
  #496 (permalink)
Elite Member
Des Moines, Iowa
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: Ninja, TOS
Broker/Data: AMP/CQG, TOS
Favorite Futures: CL, TF, GC
 
madLyfe's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,638 since Feb 2011
Thanks: 9,214 given, 1,008 received


DarkPoolTrading View Post
The issue is described in detail in the link I posted. But to summarize:

Lets say a trader does the 50k continuous combine and takes 3 months to complete it. That means it took him 3 months to make $3K. If that trader moves to the next stages he is expected to build a big enough cushion in 10 days such that the trailing drawdown can be moved up and he has to rely on whatever profit he has made in 10 days.

You are asking someone who took 3 months to make $3k to all of a sudden change the way he trades because of an arbitrary 10 days. Simply put, if the combine is continuous, so should ltp and live.

The very nature of the continuous combine (the way it is marketed to the public) is that you don't have to rush. It attracts traders with this mindset and style of trading. Yet when they pass, all of a sudden an arbitrary 10 day deadline is placed on them.

Anyway, I will refrain from rehashing the issue because it seems nothing will be done about this and I no longer participate in the combine anyway. Just thought I would post the link since it was relevant to the discussion.

i get what you are saying and maybe they need to make it more clear of the 10 day trailing drawdown on the continuous combines. i know ive stated that they need to put that rule above in the trade report like with the other rules just for good measure. that still doesnt change the fact that they need people to perform and not flounder about.

dont believe anything you hear and only half of what you see

\_(ツ)_/

(╯□)╯︵ ┻━┻
Reply With Quote
 
  #497 (permalink)
Elite Member
Tallinn, Estonia
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: SC
Broker/Data: Oanda
Favorite Futures: USOil / West Texas Oil
 
lemons's Avatar
 
Posts: 746 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 1,332 given, 1,906 received


madLyfe View Post
i get what you are saying and maybe they need to make it more clear of the 10 day trailing drawdown on the continuous combines. i know ive stated that they need to put that rule above in the trade report like with the other rules just for good measure. that still doesnt change the fact that they need people to perform and not flounder about.

Agreed, thats why Combine must have LTP rules.

Reply With Quote
 
  #498 (permalink)
Elite Member
Des Moines, Iowa
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: Ninja, TOS
Broker/Data: AMP/CQG, TOS
Favorite Futures: CL, TF, GC
 
madLyfe's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,638 since Feb 2011
Thanks: 9,214 given, 1,008 received


lemons View Post
Agreed, thats why Combine must have LTP rules.

or, if you cant adjust, take a regular 10day combine.

dont believe anything you hear and only half of what you see

\_(ツ)_/

(╯□)╯︵ ┻━┻
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to madLyfe for this post:
 
  #499 (permalink)
Elite Member
Courtenay, Vancouver Island, Canada
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Favorite Futures: futures
 
Posts: 12 since Feb 2011
Thanks: 8 given, 0 received

news trading

This is a question for Michael.

At the moment I am doing a continuous combine.

The method being used... trading news releases using specialized bracketing software.

Just starting the second month in the combine now and have gone passed the target level but need to bring one product above zero.

From the start I had planned on trading the 2 month minimum regardless of when the target was hit.

Reason being... I was told or read somewhere that you could trade the news releases in the combine but could not trade the news with a live funded account until you built up equity using some other method.

Because of this rule... I was hoping that if I could show consistant growth in the account with little drawdown, minimal contracts, and with tight stoplosses, etc... that the equity partner could be convinced to allow me to trade in a live account without having to find some other way to build up equity.

Personally... I don't want to trade any other way... I could make a long list of reasons why this method works well... but the main thing is... everybody has to find their own niche and after 20 years of looking for something that fits and feels right... this is it.

This business requires the trader to keep evolving and changing with the market conditions and new technology... and am hoping that TST and the equity partner will too.

So the question is... if a trader could pass the combine successfully trading news releases... why would he/she not be allowed to trade a live funded account using the same parameters/method from the beginning?

Reply With Quote
 
  #500 (permalink)
Elite Member
Nanjing, NJ
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: CQG/TOS
Broker/Data: Optimus/CQG
Favorite Futures: CL
 
Posts: 99 since Jun 2010
Thanks: 29 given, 67 received


the reason is simple: you can trade news release using bracket order on a SIM account with nice profit due to unrealistic fills, but stand no chance on a live account when the book is thin and move is volatile during news releases.

Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > > TopstepTrader's Michael Patak (Founder) - Ask Me Anything (AMA)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)
 

Spring Grains Outlook w/Sean Lusk @ Walsh Trading

Elite only

FIO Video Journal Challenge featuring NinjaTrader ($2,000+ of prizes)

April

Process above all else w/Anthony Crudele @ Futures Radio Show

Elite only

Machine Learning - Quantitative Trading w/Martin Froehler @ Quantiacs

Elite only

Market Dynamics w/Peter Davies @ Jigsaw Trading

Elite only

Ask Me Anything w/Patrick Rooney @ Trading Technologies

Apr 18

Ask Me Anything w/FuturesTrader71

Apr 19

Machine Learning w/Kris Longmore

Elite only

Market Analysis w/Dave Forss

Apr 25

Introducing iSystems with Stage 5 Trading

Apr 27
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Webinar: TopstepTrader on Discipline/Psychology (Michael Patak and John Hoagland) Big Mike Psychology and Money Management 24 July 1st, 2016 11:45 PM
Patak Trading Partners Tundi Vendors and Product Reviews 13 November 17th, 2015 10:47 AM
Michael A.K.A Mitchell is here CaesarMitchell Beginners and Introductions 1 August 13th, 2015 03:04 AM
Webinar: TopstepTrader Michael Patak and Bob Iaccino on Mastering Candlestick Math Big Mike Vendors and Product Reviews 10 January 19th, 2015 11:49 PM
Michael' Surf Ride2021 Beginners and Introductions 1 September 29th, 2012 02:08 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 PM.

no new posts
Page generated 2017-03-28 in 0.14 seconds with 20 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.205.60.171