You can get IQFeed or Kinetick for that, or you can fund an account at a brokerage and pay zero or close to zero for data. What more could you want?
Due to time constraints, please do not PM me if your question can be resolved or answered on the forum.
Need help? 1) Stop changing things. No new indicators, charts, or methods. Be consistent with what is in front of you first. 2) Start a journal and post to it daily with the trades you made to show your strengths and weaknesses. 3) Set goals for yourself to reach daily. Make them about how you trade, not how much money you make. 4) Accept responsibility for your actions. Stop looking elsewhere to explain away poor performance. 5) Where to start as a trader? Watch this webinar and read this thread for hundreds of questions and answers. 6) Help using the forum? Watch this video to learn general tips on using the site.
If you want to support our community, become an Elite Member.
I apologize if this has been addressed already, but I didn't read through all 50 pages.
What is the employment relationship with the sponsoring company if you become a funded trader?
W2? 1099? Something else? Is the trader earning an income or are they capital gains? Do they offer benefits, etc.?
You're an independent contractor. You get a 1099. There are no benefits: you're not an employee. As to whether it's straight income or not, TsT has always said, "Consult with your tax professional." (They aren't giving tax advice.)
Being a 1099 it should be seen as income. The money your earned was earned as income, you did not put up the principal that is being invested. Having talked to my CPA she stated it is earned income and should be taxed as such.
But as bob noted, seek your own tax professional for advice into your situation.
The following 3 users say Thank You to tturner86 for this post:
Hi guys, I wanted to get some feedback to help me try to understand something a little bit better.
A funded account has a maximum draw down limit. If you hit that draw down, you lose the account.
10,000 account, maximum drawdown is $1,000
30,000 account, maximum drawdown is $1,500
50,000 account, maximum drawdown is $2,000
100,000 account, maximum drawdown is $3,000
150,000 account, maximum drawdown is $4,500
It uses a trailing stop style feature where if you build up your account, you can create some cushion. In otherwords, if you generate $10,000 in the account, you can lose that $10,000 and still stay funded. You just cannot bring under the certain amount (example, 50k account has 2k draw-down limit. If you ever get under $48,000, you will lose the account)
Ok, so now lets discuss something. We all know the rule that we should risk a maximum of 1-2% of our equity on any trade idea. Futurestrader71 did a full video discussing this topic and i'd advice people to watch it if they havent.
Lets take the $50,000 account provided by topsteptrader for example.
1% of $50,000 = $500.
But TopStep only allows you a maximum draw down of $2,000. So if you risk 1% of 50,000 you will lose the account if you make 4 wrong trades. So its like you are risking 25% of your account. To avoid this, one would want to reduce this risk back down to the 1%-2% level.
So logically what this actually means, is that the 1% rule should be applied not to the total account size, but to the maximum draw-down that they allow you.
So 1% of $2000 = $20
One contract on the ES is ($12.50). Add another $4-5 for the transaction fees and your looking at $16.50-17.50 lost every trade you put on. Add a little bit more because of slippage and you can basically round it off to $20 per round turn. So you cannot even trade 1% of your max drawdown, because you lose 1% every trade you take with 1 contract. So you have to trade at least 2%.
So my question boils down to this. What is the point of working so hard to get "funded" with places like topsteptrader or any propshops that let you trade their money, when in reality you don't have access to the full capital. You only have access to your maximum drawdown.
Granted one can argue that the maximum drawdown is a trailing one. But that doesn't really change much in the grand scheme of things.
If you make $25,000 on your $50,000 account, you have made 50% (which might seem achievable)
However to make that $25,000 using good money management (ie risking 1-2% of your max-drawdown because that is the size of your account in reality), you would need to make 1150% ($2000 + 1050% = 25,000)
When you look at it like that, it no longer seems realistic.
So my question is what is the point of even trying to get a "funded account" with topsteptrader? When you factor in the restrictive rules (eg you cant swing trade because you cannot hold through closes), and the fact that the equity-partner is taking 20% of the profits you make, wouldn't it be more logical to simply open your own tiny account and trade with leverage?
So instead of going through all the hastle of trying to get "funded", just open your own tiny account. You would be able to trade a $2,000 futures account with the same money management rules as you would for a 50,000 "funded" account, because the funded account's true value is simply its maximum drawdown.
But the more I think about it, the less sense it makes. What am I missing here? I don't think people quite realize that if you plan on trading with realistic money management, these funded accounts are nothing more than tiny undercapitalized trading accounts where someone else takes 20% of the profits.
Is there something I am missing here?
Last edited by Sufyan; January 31st, 2015 at 04:42 PM.
Largest account i've traded is a 5k forex account.
Unfortunately it was down to $200 in a few months. Luckily i've had much more success in recent months, but that that is neither here nor there.
My question is do you agree that in reality the maximum drawdown is the actual value of the account you are being funded, not the quoted value.
In other words, instead of them saying "were funding you with a 50k account", it would be more accurate to say "were funding you with a 2k account" (because if you try to trade account amount, rather than trade the drawdown amount, you will blow up very fast)
I was just curious as to whether my reason was wrong. Sometimes we work something out, but there is a mistake in our reasoning. So I wanted to know (for my own personal decisions, rather than to bash any company) whether I am correct in my line of thinking.
The following 3 users say Thank You to Sufyan for this post: