Posts: 2,493 since Sep 2010
Thanks Given: 2,441
Thanks Received: 3,791
|
It's not negativity, it's criticism from a community. There is a huge community of users here on futures.io (formerly BMT) who have anticipated a bang from the 7.0 that is still in beta. Now it's version 22...we celebrated bar mitzvah @ 13, 21 we were legal to drink and now we are waiting for Beta 65 so we can all retire Ninja Warriors. ok, that was my little comedy act.
We do a lot of automated trading via NinjaScript and Easy language.
In the end it boils down to comfort level because we work with developers who do great on both in terms of implementation. We have guys who run automation on Ninja smoothly via Rithmic.
If you find the NinjaScript better work with it!
Try to stick to 6.5 until 7.0 is out of bEta ( E capitalized because it should stand for Experimental)
We did hook our TradeStation automated programs to execute via Ninja 7/Rithmic and it works fine.
I am not pushing you one way or another because ultimately it depends on your methodologies.
One of the languages is better for it.
We Also started using MultiCharts, and it has the ability to have a data feed of your choice which is a great benefit.
You will get great feedback from this community here.
Trading futures and options involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. You may lose more than your initial investment. All posts are opinions and do not claim to be facts. Please conduct your own due diligence. Use only Risk capital when trading Futures.
1 800 771 6748 local 561 367 8686 email [email protected] |
|
