NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Best books on chart pattern/technical analysis


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one JonnyBoy with 14 posts (21 thanks)
    2. looks_two buylosellhi with 6 posts (3 thanks)
    3. looks_3 semiopen with 6 posts (7 thanks)
    4. looks_4 bobwest with 3 posts (3 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one TickedOff with 1.7 thanks per post
    2. looks_two JonnyBoy with 1.5 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 semiopen with 1.2 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 bobwest with 1 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 16,557 views
    2. thumb_up 61 thanks given
    3. group 265 followers
    1. forum 60 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
 

Best books on chart pattern/technical analysis

 
 
TickedOff's Avatar
 TickedOff 
Sydney, NSW, Australia
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader with Jigsaw DOM
Trading: CL, 6E, ES, Piano
Posts: 264 since Nov 2014
Thanks Given: 229
Thanks Received: 250

Best books that have helped you on technical analysis and chart trading?

Started this thread
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Exit Strategy
NinjaTrader
Futures True Range Report
The Elite Circle
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
NexusFi Journal Challenge - April 2024
Feedback and Announcements
 
 
 
JonnyBoy's Avatar
 JonnyBoy 
Montreal, Quebec
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader 8
Broker: Kinetick
Trading: ES
Posts: 1,561 since Apr 2012
Thanks Given: 706
Thanks Received: 3,854



TickedOff View Post
Best books that have helped you on technical analysis and chart trading?

The best book I have ever read is by David Aronson called Evidence Based Technical Analysis (EBTA). Essentially he debunks the majority of technical analysis and chart pattern trading as being worse than bad and provides a plethora of evidence to back it up.

Classic chart patterns, Fibonacci and Elliott Waves are blown up right in front of you eyes and as a 'non-believer' in the first place, this just cemented what I have known for years.

The shining light of this book is that he does define methods for data mining that are evidence based and could provide you with positive results if you follow them. At the end of the day, you can either keep on believing technical analysis works, or you can read his book and find out how to potentially create something that does work.

--------------------------------------------------------
- Trade what you see. Invest in what you believe -
--------------------------------------------------------
 
 semiopen 
hillsborough nj
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation/Excel
Broker: TradeStation
Trading: emicro
Posts: 98 since Sep 2018
Thanks Given: 18
Thanks Received: 46

EBTA is more of a great concept, maybe because my "free" kindle edition is hard to read, but on the other hand, the message is pretty ,much delivered in the first paragraph or so - ie. almost all technical stuff people use is idiotic.

Dr Howard Bandy probably has the best books - Amazon Page for Bandy

His level of education is fascinating.

My personal opinion is that his stuff, despite being more intelligent, is about as flawed as the rest of the industry.

The main reason is that the individual finance industry stopped developing at a certain point to allow commercial products a space to peddle their fish. Commercial backtesting, for example, relies on a trade listing. From a development point of view, the trade listing is a reasonable intermediate step in prototype development but not a good place to stop. Among the issues arising from this, is that the trade listing generally calculates returns on a fixed investment amount which is wrong - returns should be expressed as natural logarithms.

Thanked by:
 
 
JonnyBoy's Avatar
 JonnyBoy 
Montreal, Quebec
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader 8
Broker: Kinetick
Trading: ES
Posts: 1,561 since Apr 2012
Thanks Given: 706
Thanks Received: 3,854


semiopen View Post
EBTA is more of a great concept, maybe because my "free" kindle edition is hard to read, but on the other hand, the message is pretty ,much delivered in the first paragraph or so - ie. almost all technical stuff people use is idiotic.

Dr Howard Bandy probably has the best books - Amazon Page for Bandy

His level of education is fascinating.

My personal opinion is that his stuff, despite being more intelligent, is about as flawed as the rest of the industry.

The main reason is that the individual finance industry stopped developing at a certain point to allow commercial products a space to peddle their fish. Commercial backtesting, for example, relies on a trade listing. From a development point of view, the trade listing is a reasonable intermediate step in prototype development but not a good place to stop. Among the issues arising from this, is that the trade listing generally calculates returns on a fixed investment amount which is wrong - returns should be expressed as natural logarithms.

Aronson's book does cover many of the aspects to do with data mining and back testing yourself. It does get heavy in places and takes a few reads, but once you wrap your head around what he is trying to get across, it is fascinating - but best of all, his testing can be replicated. So, I did.

As an example, I have used his method(s) to debunk some very common technical indicators. It took me a while to data mine and put together (plus this is an ongoing exercise) but essentially this is my list (so far) of indicators that I have found to have zero (most are beyond zero) statistical edge in using them. I.E. they are completely useless.

Stochastics
Price levels (round numbers etc.)
ADX
CCI
Diagonal trendlines (I couldn't believe it either...and I still have tendency to use them)
Japanese candlestick patterns
Chart patterns (non EBTA)
Fibonacci
Bollinger bands
MA Crossovers (not completely useless because I discovered a different way to apply them that could be quite profitable.).
RSI

It is a punch in the gut to the T.A. believers no matter what evidence is presented to them. They still want to believe in it and I guarantee there are many traders out there using some of the indicators I have listed.

I continue to study new ones as I find the time. Next up is traditional Elliott Waves, not Quantified Elliott Waves (which actually works for medium to long term forecasting).

--------------------------------------------------------
- Trade what you see. Invest in what you believe -
--------------------------------------------------------
Thanked by:
 
 semiopen 
hillsborough nj
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation/Excel
Broker: TradeStation
Trading: emicro
Posts: 98 since Sep 2018
Thanks Given: 18
Thanks Received: 46

I've been seriously looking at backtesting recently. Like the name suggests, it seems to be set up backwards. Instead of setting something up and then checking to see if it worked in the past, why not first look at what worked in the past and then set something up?

There are several serious issues with using academic statistics, not least of which is the typical annoying statistician personality type. Quantitative analysis has little in common with normal statistical applications. In any case, both disciplines are OK for demonstrating the idiocy of the implementation of the vast majority of technical techniques. Non Statistical Quantitative analysis can allow one to work at a high level without the baggage of a statistical guilt trip.

There are three major rational ways to analyze price in relation to time: Rate of change, average, and range.

Stochastics (from the list in the post above) is a highly dubious interpretation of range. One can legitimately label stochastics silly - (why use exponential averages, who cares about the signal line, are 20 and 80 really magic numbers) but that just suggests that one is not analyzing range properly.

 
 
JonnyBoy's Avatar
 JonnyBoy 
Montreal, Quebec
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader 8
Broker: Kinetick
Trading: ES
Posts: 1,561 since Apr 2012
Thanks Given: 706
Thanks Received: 3,854


semiopen View Post
I've been seriously looking at backtesting recently. Like the name suggests, it seems to be set up backwards. Instead of setting something up and then checking to see if it worked in the past, why not first look at what worked in the past and then set something up?

There are several serious issues with using academic statistics, not least of which is the typical annoying statistician personality type. Quantitative analysis has little in common with normal statistical applications. In any case, both disciplines are OK for demonstrating the idiocy of the implementation of the vast majority of technical techniques. Non Statistical Quantitative analysis can allow one to work at a high level without the baggage of a statistical guilt trip.

There are three major rational ways to analyze price in relation to time: Rate of change, average, and range.

Stochastics (from the list in the post above) is a highly dubious interpretation of range. One can legitimately label stochastics silly - (why use exponential averages, who cares about the signal line, are 20 and 80 really magic numbers) but that just suggests that one is not analyzing range properly.

A Monte-Carlo test is the best way to test a null hypothesis. You can determine if a trading system or indicator truly matches the position of raw returns as opposed to being intelligent. But this can't be done all of the time because not all of the information is available. Hence, why the data mining part is imperative.

As for the Stochastics, they were invented in the 1950s, are based on overbought / oversold which in futures trading doesn't exist, the fast or slow mechanic is terrible as it gives many false signals even when price is range bound and when price trends, traders get killed.

You can test this hypotheses on any numbers you want in the Stochastics, 20 and 80 are just the default. It is a terrible indicator that has no place on a chart.

--------------------------------------------------------
- Trade what you see. Invest in what you believe -
--------------------------------------------------------
 
 semiopen 
hillsborough nj
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation/Excel
Broker: TradeStation
Trading: emicro
Posts: 98 since Sep 2018
Thanks Given: 18
Thanks Received: 46

I bought Bandy's book on Monte Carlo simulations and was quite disappointed, not by the book quality but because they seem to be a waste of time and the book wasn't cheap. Even the name is weird; I prefer Atlantic City simulation because it is tackier.

Statisticians are good at telling other people their ideas are worthless; but they are not so good at focusing that insight onto themselves.

 
 
JonnyBoy's Avatar
 JonnyBoy 
Montreal, Quebec
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader 8
Broker: Kinetick
Trading: ES
Posts: 1,561 since Apr 2012
Thanks Given: 706
Thanks Received: 3,854


semiopen View Post
Statisticians are good at telling other people their ideas are worthless; but they are not so good at focusing that insight onto themselves.

Meaning?

--------------------------------------------------------
- Trade what you see. Invest in what you believe -
--------------------------------------------------------
Thanked by:
 
 semiopen 
hillsborough nj
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation/Excel
Broker: TradeStation
Trading: emicro
Posts: 98 since Sep 2018
Thanks Given: 18
Thanks Received: 46



JonnyBoy View Post
Meaning?

When I looked at the setup instructions carefully for an Atlantic City simulation, I realized my work already incorporated whatever it is supposed to do.

A basic problem with statistics seems to be that there isn't an addressing methodology to catalog information. Not easy to explain simply - sort of a data rather than a mathematical issue. This problem is obvious if one looks at a quantitative finance text; there are tons of fascinating studies but they are generally too complex to be easily recallable at a later time.

For issues with a simpler example, take the standard deviation. That has great value as an example of data manipulation using Euler's number, but the standard deviation value is not very useful when applied to price movements. The information that standard deviation imparts can be derived more easily by other methods.

Other than the addressing methodology (sort of related to abstractionation - if that is a word) the main theoretical problem with statistics is time. Anything statistics does with time is questionable - standard deviation relies on taking the square root of time for example. Tell me how that ends well.


 



Last Updated on February 23, 2020


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts