Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I trade with 200 tick charts...which can be noisy. However, I plot an adaptive moving average with a period of 50....i.e. 10,000 trades. It works well, but I need to make a trend determination.
Given 50 bars, what should the delta be to determine the trend ?
Avg[0] - Avg[10] where 10 would be based on the period.....so 50 = 10, 100 = 20.....
these are only examples.
If the offset is too small, any slight change in the trend will be detected.
This of course would be the pullbacks....which absolutely KILL ME.
So I want an offset that would ignore the PB's.
Should I backtest this, or do one of you have a rule-of-thumb for this determination ?
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
you are right 200t is very noisy, so much that it will chop up whatever trend indicator you use, switch to fib indicator look for reversal points instead
Not big on fibs....in fact, fib charts give me a huge headache.
200t is easily tamed with a 50 period moving average.....just that I need to determine trend from the average.
Using least squares regression for trend is overkill IMHO....just need to look-back a certain period.