NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Trade ETFs and very high liquid stocks to sidestep HFTs?


Discussion in Stocks and ETFs

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one deaddog with 2 posts (0 thanks)
    2. looks_two AJStanbridge with 2 posts (0 thanks)
    3. looks_3 mcteague with 2 posts (0 thanks)
    4. looks_4 sterling729 with 2 posts (0 thanks)
    1. trending_up 1,360 views
    2. thumb_up 0 thanks given
    3. group 4 followers
    1. forum 6 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Trade ETFs and very high liquid stocks to sidestep HFTs?

  #1 (permalink)
 sterling729 
Canada
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Metatrader, ToS
Trading: Forex, equities, ETFs
Posts: 16 since Oct 2014
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Received: 4

Recently, I find I've forced out of positions from price manipulations via HFTs intraday. Or, been entering positions I thought were good long setups when it was relaly HFTs battling it out. I am wondering, has anyone tried to sidestep them by trading stocks that have very high volume intraday or ETFs? (eg. CSCO, FB, BABA, etc.)

Cheers

Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
REcommedations for programming help
Sierra Chart
NexusFi Journal Challenge - May 2024
Feedback and Announcements
How to apply profiles
Traders Hideout
Trade idea based off three indicators.
Traders Hideout
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
What is Markets Chat (markets.chat) real-time trading ro …
72 thanks
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
55 thanks
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
26 thanks
Bigger Wins or Fewer Losses?
24 thanks
The Program
20 thanks
  #3 (permalink)
 
deaddog's Avatar
 deaddog 
Prince George BC Canada
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: National Bank Direct
Broker: NBD/BMO/Questrade
Trading: Stocks
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 1,306 since May 2013
Thanks Given: 184
Thanks Received: 4,063



sterling729 View Post
Recently, I find I've forced out of positions from price manipulations via HFTs intraday. Or, been entering positions I thought were good long setups when it was relaly HFTs battling it out.
Cheers

Can you give us an example or two?

"The days when I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations, I have really good days" RW Hubbard
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)
 sterling729 
Canada
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Metatrader, ToS
Trading: Forex, equities, ETFs
Posts: 16 since Oct 2014
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Received: 4


deaddog View Post
Can you give us an example or two?

Sure, at certain times with low volume stocks, I'll see a bid at 40c. I may put a bid at 41 (even with 10 shares sometimes), and then the bid goes to 42, then I go to 43, and it goes to 44, and so on. I did this to see if there was really an algorithm at play and I didn't have to risk that much money. Eventually, it got to 75c before I was filled. This was just an experiment and I risked $2 to see how price behaved.

But it's not refusal to get filled that's annoying. Many times I'll backtest certain setups, and they work out reasonably well. Then when I trade these setups live (with lower volume stocks), I put an limit buy order in and get filled. The stock trades immediately lower, lower, and lower, until finally I hit out. 5-30min later the stocks is 1-2 points higher than when I bought it. I look at the volume, it doesn't show any significant buying whatsoever. In some cases, there's practically 0 volume from where I bought and hit out. This seems to be a reoccurring theme especially with the lower volume stocks.

For example, with CSCO, I find it behaves much better. The bids are real, and they don't tend to lift on and off within a microseconds. And by low volume, I mean it trades less than 60k shares per 5min

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)
 
deaddog's Avatar
 deaddog 
Prince George BC Canada
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: National Bank Direct
Broker: NBD/BMO/Questrade
Trading: Stocks
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 1,306 since May 2013
Thanks Given: 184
Thanks Received: 4,063


sterling729 View Post
Sure, at certain times with low volume stocks, I'll see a bid at 40c. I may put a bid at 41 (even with 10 shares sometimes), and then the bid goes to 42, then I go to 43, and it goes to 44, and so on. I did this to see if there was really an algorithm at play and I didn't have to risk that much money. Eventually, it got to 75c before I was filled. This was just an experiment and I risked $2 to see how price behaved.

But it's not refusal to get filled that's annoying. Many times I'll backtest certain setups, and they work out reasonably well. Then when I trade these setups live (with lower volume stocks), I put an limit buy order in and get filled. The stock trades immediately lower, lower, and lower, until finally I hit out. 5-30min later the stocks is 1-2 points higher than when I bought it. I look at the volume, it doesn't show any significant buying whatsoever. In some cases, there's practically 0 volume from where I bought and hit out. This seems to be a reoccurring theme especially with the lower volume stocks.

For example, with CSCO, I find it behaves much better. The bids are real, and they don't tend to lift on and off within a microseconds. And by low volume, I mean it trades less than 60k shares per 5min

I don't think that is HFT so much as the market makers.

"The days when I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations, I have really good days" RW Hubbard
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)
 mcteague 
New York NY USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: esignal, thinkorswim,
Trading: Stocks
Posts: 122 since Oct 2012
Thanks Given: 63
Thanks Received: 35

HFT stands for High Frequency Trading. Usually a computerized trading algorithm. So lets use a tiny bit of logic.
If a stock was being manipulated by HFT would it have low volume?

My personal view is if you are a technical trader you should not trade low volume stocks.

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)
 mcteague 
New York NY USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: esignal, thinkorswim,
Trading: Stocks
Posts: 122 since Oct 2012
Thanks Given: 63
Thanks Received: 35


AJStanbridge View Post
Seems that HFT gets the finger pointed at it for just about every adverse move in any traders experience these days. If you think about it, if HFT were really trying to hit traders for a few extra hundredths on the bid/offer then there should be as many traders beneficially assisted as there are those adversely impacted.

HFT in essence is a set of front-running techniques used to gazump large orders which under current SEC regs must be split and met at best price across all exchanges trading the underlying. In the extremely low probability event of you choosing to place your trade at exactly the same time as an institutional sized package hits the market, then yes, you can probably claim to have been done in by an HFT algo. But the probabilities are low and you can take solace in the fact that you are just as likely to get a lift as a hit on that basis, plus, it wasn't aimed at you personally.

It’s equally unlikely your broker will be playing with the bid/offer just for your 10 shares as he will be exposing himself to a counter move with real size if he’s way out of whack, he’ll get seriously and quickly arbed. It just wouldn’t pay him to do it.

But your hypothesis that trading higher liquidity instruments offers a better deal is generally correct.


I assume you really mean "and" and not "but" in your last sentence. Nothing you wrote before that would contradict what I wrote. I simply pointed out that if a stock was being traded "frequently" it would not have low volume.

As far as I can tell we completely agree

Reply With Quote




Last Updated on December 22, 2014


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts