NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Rithmic vs. CQG Question


Discussion in Brokers

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Jonson with 3 posts (0 thanks)
    2. looks_two liquidcci with 2 posts (5 thanks)
    3. looks_3 hoolio with 2 posts (0 thanks)
    4. looks_4 xplorer with 2 posts (0 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one DavidHP with 6 thanks per post
    2. looks_two liquidcci with 2.5 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Theodutchtrader with 2 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Fatfish with 1 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 39,000 views
    2. thumb_up 16 thanks given
    3. group 15 followers
    1. forum 21 posts
    2. attach_file 1 attachments




 
 

Rithmic vs. CQG Question

 
SpencerEng
Salt Lake City Utah USA
 
Posts: 10 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 18
Thanks Received: 1

For those of you who've used both feeds, do you have a preference and why? The demo's I've tested seem like I get a faster fill using CQG, and the quotes seem to be coming in a tiny bit faster than Rithmic. In live trading is CQG and Rithmic comparable with fills? Does it matter what FCM's you use with the data feed?


Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Pivot Indicator like the old SwingTemp by Big Mike
NinjaTrader
How to apply profiles
Traders Hideout
Exit Strategy
NinjaTrader
REcommedations for programming help
Sierra Chart
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
29 thanks
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
25 thanks
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
24 thanks
Bigger Wins or Fewer Losses?
22 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
17 thanks
 
 
liquidcci's Avatar
 liquidcci 
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Master
Platform: ninjatrader, r-trader
Trading: NQ, CL
Posts: 866 since Jun 2011
Thanks Given: 610
Thanks Received: 1,091


I have used both with Ninja. You will not be able to visually tell any difference in speed. They both are fast to fast for human eye to determine anything. I had nothing but problems with CQG feed. I wanted to like it because of the server side OCO but to many disconnects. This may not be everyones experience but for me it was not good.

Rithmic has been rock solid. If you need speed you can colocate with Rithmic directly and are tied directly into their engine. When I say directly you are on same router with the engine. Its not cheap but is worth it.

I also would not rely on demos to tell you anything as demo may be slower.

"The day I became a winning trader was the day it became boring. Daily losses no longer bother me and daily wins no longer excited me. Took years of pain and busting a few accounts before finally got my mind right. I survived the darkness within and now just chillax and let my black box do the work."
 
 
DavidHP's Avatar
 DavidHP 
Isla Mujeres, MX
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Ninjatrader / Optimus Futures / AmpFutures
Trading: ES / 6E / 6B / CL
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 1,611 since Aug 2009
Thanks Given: 11,336
Thanks Received: 2,744


liquidcci View Post
I have used both with Ninja. You will not be able to visually tell any difference in speed. They both are fast to fast for human eye to determine anything.

I disagree.
I can see the difference in the two feeds.
Especially on days like today (Fed Meeting release days)

All day the market has been slow.
Just before a Fed decision I always reboot my machine and restart NT.

I've noticed when the decision comes in there is a mass of data.
Just after the Fed announcement...
When I'm connected to CQG I get a lot of pausing and spurts of data and freezing.
When connected to Rithmic none of that exists.

I can connect to Rithmic and let it stream and get consistent data.
Then disconnect and connect to CQG and I get data then pauses then an ORANGE Connected from NT.
(That means it is still connected but not optimal)

If I disconnect and connect again to Rithmic, no data pauses.
Perhaps it is just my connection but it happens too often for me to think otherwise.

If I do a ping test I get consistent ping results with either connection to a third party IP address.

The slow down appears to only be between my NT and the CQG connection.

FWIW

Rejoice in the Thunderstorms of Life . . .
Knowing it's not about Clouds or Wind. . .
But Learning to Dance in the Rain ! ! !
Follow me on Twitter
 
 
Jonson's Avatar
 Jonson 
Russia, St.Petersburg
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, CQG Desktop
Broker: NinjaTrader/CQG
Trading: Futures
Posts: 247 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 218
Thanks Received: 118

i use a rithmic and like it

* If investing gets too difficult for a seventh grader to understand, the system is needlessly complex
* Markets produce an enormous volume of information, much of which is redundant
* In every game and con there's always an opponent, and there's always a victim. The trick is to know when you're the latter, so you can become the former
 
 
Jonson's Avatar
 Jonson 
Russia, St.Petersburg
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, CQG Desktop
Broker: NinjaTrader/CQG
Trading: Futures
Posts: 247 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 218
Thanks Received: 118


SpencerEng View Post
For those of you who've used both feeds, do you have a preference and why? The demo's I've tested seem like I get a faster fill using CQG, and the quotes seem to be coming in a tiny bit faster than Rithmic. In live trading is CQG and Rithmic comparable with fills? Does it matter what FCM's you use with the data feed?

t4 feed - try it too

* If investing gets too difficult for a seventh grader to understand, the system is needlessly complex
* Markets produce an enormous volume of information, much of which is redundant
* In every game and con there's always an opponent, and there's always a victim. The trick is to know when you're the latter, so you can become the former
 
 
liquidcci's Avatar
 liquidcci 
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Master
Platform: ninjatrader, r-trader
Trading: NQ, CL
Posts: 866 since Jun 2011
Thanks Given: 610
Thanks Received: 1,091

@DavidHP I can't say I disagree with that. Typically it is almost impossible to see a feed difference with human eye. But under those circumstances where a lot of data is coming in I can see where would be easy to see. My experience with rithmic has personally been much better than CQG.


DavidHP View Post
I disagree.
I can see the difference in the two feeds.
Especially on days like today (Fed Meeting release days)

All day the market has been slow.
Just before a Fed decision I always reboot my machine and restart NT.

I've noticed when the decision comes in there is a mass of data.
Just after the Fed announcement...
When I'm connected to CQG I get a lot of pausing and spurts of data and freezing.
When connected to Rithmic none of that exists.

I can connect to Rithmic and let it stream and get consistent data.
Then disconnect and connect to CQG and I get data then pauses then an ORANGE Connected from NT.
(That means it is still connected but not optimal)

If I disconnect and connect again to Rithmic, no data pauses.
Perhaps it is just my connection but it happens too often for me to think otherwise.

If I do a ping test I get consistent ping results with either connection to a third party IP address.

The slow down appears to only be between my NT and the CQG connection.

FWIW


"The day I became a winning trader was the day it became boring. Daily losses no longer bother me and daily wins no longer excited me. Took years of pain and busting a few accounts before finally got my mind right. I survived the darkness within and now just chillax and let my black box do the work."
Thanked by:
 
 
Keen4Snow's Avatar
 Keen4Snow 
Destin, FL / EU (Brno, Czech Rep.)
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: R|Trader, NinjaTrader, JForex
Trading: CL, NQ, TF, 6E
Posts: 20 since Apr 2010
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Received: 15


Jonson View Post
i use a rithmic and like it

what's your access time to Rithmic servers?
I've got under 60 ms from central Europe when using Europe gateway.
Good job...It used to be 140 ms using standard Chicago gateway.

RTrader/Window/Preferences/Performance/Ping

 
 Theodutchtrader 
Maastricht, The netherlands
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: Ninjatrader and Multicharts
Trading: ES,NQ.YM and dutch stocks
Posts: 15 since Nov 2011
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Received: 3

When you are a algo trader and you do trade the futures market you need CQG. CQG offers month of tick data rithmic offers only one day of tickdata.

Thanked by:
 
 
Jonson's Avatar
 Jonson 
Russia, St.Petersburg
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, CQG Desktop
Broker: NinjaTrader/CQG
Trading: Futures
Posts: 247 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 218
Thanks Received: 118



Keen4Snow View Post
what's your access time to Rithmic servers?
I've got under 60 ms from central Europe when using Europe gateway.
Good job...It used to be 140 ms using standard Chicago gateway.

RTrader/Window/Preferences/Performance/Ping

hi
55 ms from central Europe

* If investing gets too difficult for a seventh grader to understand, the system is needlessly complex
* Markets produce an enormous volume of information, much of which is redundant
* In every game and con there's always an opponent, and there's always a victim. The trick is to know when you're the latter, so you can become the former

 



Last Updated on July 20, 2021


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts