Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
A quick look at this indicates there may be an assumption you are making. Once the FLAT triggers and enters the first limit order, the status of LONG is not valid until most likely the next Bar (or a few Ticks later if you are on COBC=false). So expect the next bar to place the additional positions.
Have you tried this strategy with:
CalculateOnBarClose = false;
Also, I am not certain as I haven't played with these NT functions in a while, but I seem to remember NT will not let you set a LONG LIMIT below the ASK price. Even your first "Compra1", this could be below the Ask by the time it is processed and get rejected. I think I understand why this is a desirable setup and one of the reasons I started working on LOM to get around some of the NT7 limitations, but I don't think this approach will work at your broker either (even if you manually entered the orders). Test this by adding to the Ask() in all 3 Limit orders to see if they are entered, i suspect they will be.
Please review the LOM WIKI before posting questions to this thread. (
Hi All,
This thread is going to appeal more to Strategy Writers and Programmers. I have been an Elite member for quite some time now and have learned a lot about indicators and strategies …