NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





A math related question


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one trendisyourfriend with 6 posts (2 thanks)
    2. looks_two erniebilko with 3 posts (3 thanks)
    3. looks_3 cejstrup with 3 posts (4 thanks)
    4. looks_4 solotrader with 1 posts (0 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one addchild with 2 thanks per post
    2. looks_two cejstrup with 1.3 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 erniebilko with 1 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 trendisyourfriend with 0.3 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 6,527 views
    2. thumb_up 11 thanks given
    3. group 3 followers
    1. forum 13 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

A math related question

  #1 (permalink)
 
trendisyourfriend's Avatar
 trendisyourfriend 
Quebec Canada
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, NQ, YM
Frequency: Daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 4,527 since Oct 2009
Thanks Given: 4,174
Thanks Received: 6,019

I don't expect this thread to become a great discussion but i had an argument with someone about the value area and the VWAP and just would like to get some feedback from people who have some math background.

The argument was about the fact that a VWAP is just an average of volume while the Volume Value Area bands 1 standard deviation away from the VPOC was not an average.

Is it true to say the Volume Value Area Channel is somewhat a form of averaging of price around the VPOC?

Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
Trade idea based off three indicators.
Traders Hideout
Pivot Indicator like the old SwingTemp by Big Mike
NinjaTrader
Exit Strategy
NinjaTrader
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Diary of a simple price action trader
26 thanks
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
24 thanks
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
21 thanks
My NQ Trading Journal
16 thanks
HumbleTraders next chapter
9 thanks
  #3 (permalink)
 addchild 
Bay Area California
 
Experience: None
Platform: TT T4
Broker: Phillip Capital
Trading: Futures
Posts: 809 since Nov 2011
Thanks Given: 926
Thanks Received: 898



trendisyourfriend View Post
I don't expect this thread to become a great discussion but i had an argument with someone about the value area and the VWAP and just would like to get some feedback from people who have some math background.

The argument was about the fact that a VWAP is just an average of volume while the Volume Value Area bands 1 standard deviation away from the VPOC was not an average.

Is it true to say the Volume Value Area Channel is somewhat a form of averaging of price around the VPOC?

TECHNICALLY you can't have a standard deviation without an average.

Volume value area is just 70% of the periods traded volume centered around the mode (greatest frequency).

Basically someone just took the concept of a std dev and applied it incorrectly. But just because it's not good math doesn't mean it doesn't work.

.
Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #4 (permalink)
 
trendisyourfriend's Avatar
 trendisyourfriend 
Quebec Canada
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, NQ, YM
Frequency: Daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 4,527 since Oct 2009
Thanks Given: 4,174
Thanks Received: 6,019

Another math question...

I want to know the formula to find the winning % i need to achieve on a coin flip bet to reach the break even point over the long term if the payoff is 75%, i.e., i bet $1 to win .75 cents or lose $1. It must be easy but apparantly my mind is off presently. Thanks

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)
 erniebilko 
Norfolk, VA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: ensign, sterling
Trading: ES
Posts: 30 since Aug 2010
Thanks Given: 4
Thanks Received: 43

you need to win 57% of time to b/e:

(Win * Prob of Win) - (loss * Prob Loss) = 0

substituting, you get:

(0.75 * 0.57) - (1 * 0.43) = 0

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #6 (permalink)
 
trendisyourfriend's Avatar
 trendisyourfriend 
Quebec Canada
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, NQ, YM
Frequency: Daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 4,527 since Oct 2009
Thanks Given: 4,174
Thanks Received: 6,019


erniebilko View Post
you need to win 57% of time to b/e:

(Win * Prob of Win) - (loss * Prob Loss) = 0

substituting, you get:

(0.75 * 0.57) - (1 * 0.43) = 0

How do you get the 0.57 number? That's what i am trying to get via a formula.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)
 erniebilko 
Norfolk, VA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: ensign, sterling
Trading: ES
Posts: 30 since Aug 2010
Thanks Given: 4
Thanks Received: 43

i actually did it in my head. multiplying 0.75 by 4 gives 3 so you have to win 4/7 of the time to b/e

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)
 erniebilko 
Norfolk, VA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: ensign, sterling
Trading: ES
Posts: 30 since Aug 2010
Thanks Given: 4
Thanks Received: 43


trendisyourfriend View Post
I don't expect this thread to become a great discussion but i had an argument with someone about the value area and the VWAP and just would like to get some feedback from people who have some math background.

The argument was about the fact that a VWAP is just an average of volume while the Volume Value Area bands 1 standard deviation away from the VPOC was not an average.

Is it true to say the Volume Value Area Channel is somewhat a form of averaging of price around the VPOC?

No. First, the vpoc and vwap are not the same thing. vpoc is the mode, vwap is the mean. std dev bands are calculated around the mean. the bands themselves are not averages, they represent how closely the data elements cluster around the mean.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #9 (permalink)
 
cejstrup's Avatar
 cejstrup 
Denmark
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Trading: CL
Posts: 98 since Jan 2014
Thanks Given: 1,183
Thanks Received: 160


trendisyourfriend View Post
Another math question...

I want to know the formula to find the winning % i need to achieve on a coin flip bet to reach the break even point over the long term if the payoff is 75%, i.e., i bet $1 to win .75 cents or lose $1. It must be easy but apparantly my mind is off presently. Thanks

I use this formula for determining the winning percentage required for an expectancy of 0 ie break even :


WP = Winning pct
AW = Average win
AL = Average loss


WP = 1 / ( ( AW/AL ) +1 ) .

So in your case it would be :

WP = 1 / (( 0.75 ) +1 ) = 0.57 ie 57 % required for break even

Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)
 
cejstrup's Avatar
 cejstrup 
Denmark
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Trading: CL
Posts: 98 since Jan 2014
Thanks Given: 1,183
Thanks Received: 160


with .62 it's

wp = 1 / ( 0.62 +1) = 0.617 ie 61.7 %

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on July 19, 2014


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts