NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





So-Called "High Probability Trades" and Statistics


Discussion in Psychology and Money Management

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one serac with 2 posts (4 thanks)
    2. looks_two shodson with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Zondor with 1 posts (1 thanks)
    4. looks_4 vegasfoster with 1 posts (8 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one vegasfoster with 8 thanks per post
    2. looks_two Redneck with 4 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 JustinIsHere with 4 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 serac with 2 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 5,293 views
    2. thumb_up 30 thanks given
    3. group 9 followers
    1. forum 13 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

So-Called "High Probability Trades" and Statistics

  #1 (permalink)
 
serac's Avatar
 serac 
Arizona, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: MB Trading
Trading: Cello
Posts: 116 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 321
Thanks Received: 138

Hi all,

I don't want this to sound like too much of a rant. I cam to the conclusion that either a) I am pretty clueless, or b) the meaning of words (such as "probability") mean different things to me than to people with more of a trading background. This post is similar to @shodson 's thread here:

There are these terms like "high probability trades", and people saying that "I never take a trade unless it has at least a 2:1 return". Statements like this do not make sense to me.

Let's take high probability trades as an example. First, there is the sloppy language that really means "high probability of making a positive return", and not what the simplest interpretation of the words imply: "a high probability of occuring." By saying a certain trade is likely to be a winner, there are two probabilites involved: a) the probability that the setup/entrance is good, and b) the probability that market moves in the direction congruent with the setup at time of exit. Now, a) is fairly easily known. But, on a case-by-case basis, b) cannot be known until after the trade has occured.

Now to the second example. People saying that they only trade trades that have a X or better statistic. By saying this, they are saying that the probabilites of both the entrance and exit "add up" (multiplied, really) to their threshold statistic for entering the trade. But, how do they know their exit statistics before the fact? They cannot.

The only way to know the probabilities of any trade is to compute the statistics after the fact, from a group of trades (preferably, at least 30). From this collection of trades, we can compute statistics to wahzoo to our heart's content. But! We can only say, for example, "This group of trades has a profit factor of N." We cannot say "Because the group of trades had this profit factor, this particular trade had the same profit factor." We can go back and calculate the profit factor for a trade after that trade has occured. But, estimating the profit factor before the trade has occured (or finished) requires extrapolation of the market forward in time - something wrought with much uncertainty.

My question: Do most traders use nebulous/sloppy (maybe wrong?) terms, or am I missing something huge? Is there some way to estimate exit efficiency before the exit has occured? Am I dumb, or am I overthinking this?

Started this thread Reply With Quote
The following 4 users say Thank You to serac for this post:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
My NT8 Volume Profile Split by Asian/Euro/Open
NinjaTrader
NexusFi Journal Challenge - April 2024
Feedback and Announcements
Request for MACD with option to use different MAs for fa …
NinjaTrader
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Retail Trading As An Industry
67 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
47 thanks
Battlestations: Show us your trading desks!
43 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
32 thanks
What percentage per day is possible? [Poll]
31 thanks

  #3 (permalink)
 Eric j 
NY
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Esignal, MBT navigator
Trading: Currencies
Posts: 2,507 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 1,396
Thanks Received: 2,576


From google ......

Probable - likely to be the case or to happen .
Probability - the extent to which something is probable .

I avoid saying "high probabilty" because shodson might lambaste me LOL . According to the above definitions "high probability" just means something , like certain variables , is very likely to happen . If people use that term without having tested those variables is unknown but its my impression "high probabilty" is thrown around loosely .

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)
 vegasfoster 
las vegas
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Sierra Chart
Broker: Velocity/IB
Trading: 6E
Posts: 1,145 since Feb 2010
Thanks Given: 304
Thanks Received: 844

I log all posts on futures.io (formerly BMT) and have calculated that 16.8% of all posts make some sort of statistical claim. Of the 16.8%, 68.9% are in fact winners, equating to an expectancy of 11.57%. I also calculate a quantile sigma deviation using the Dr, Scholls method and have found the deviation to be within +/-1.4% over time, so I believe it to be a highly reliable figure for purposes of extrapolating future results. However, I have yet to figure a mechanical/formulaic method to maximize my exit efficiency when reading crappy posts. I still have a tendency to hang on too long and exit way later than I should. That said, with practice I have been able to increase my personal expectancy to 13.26%, but I believe it's primarily the results of thousands of hours of screen time as opposed to some "Holy Grail" of crappy post filtering. Hope that helps.

Reply With Quote
The following 8 users say Thank You to vegasfoster for this post:
  #5 (permalink)
 
Lornz's Avatar
 Lornz 
Oslo, Norway
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: CQG, Excel
Trading: CL
Posts: 1,193 since Apr 2010

Most people throw these expressions around without understanding them. There are lot of worthless buzzwords in trading, many of which relate to a lack of understanding of statistics and probability.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)
 
PandaWarrior's Avatar
 PandaWarrior 
In the heat
 
Experience: None
Posts: 3,165 since Mar 2010
Thanks Given: 6,329
Thanks Received: 13,404


vegasfoster View Post
I log all posts on futures.io (formerly BMT) and have calculated that 16.8% of all posts make some sort of statistical claim. Of the 16.8%, 68.9% are in fact winners, equating to an expectancy of 11.57%. I also calculate a quantile sigma deviation using the Dr, Scholls method and have found the deviation to be within +/-1.4% over time, so I believe it to be a highly reliable figure for purposes of extrapolating future results. However, I have yet to figure a mechanical/formulaic method to maximize my exit efficiency when reading crappy posts. I still have a tendency to hang on too long and exit way later than I should. That said, with practice I have been able to increase my personal expectancy to 13.26%, but I believe it's primarily the results of thousands of hours of screen time as opposed to some "Holy Grail" of crappy post filtering. Hope that helps.



This post made my day....

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication, Leonardo da Vinci


Most people chose unhappiness over uncertainty, Tim Ferris
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)
 
MWinfrey's Avatar
 MWinfrey 
Lubbock TX
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Stage 5 Trading
Trading: CL
Posts: 1,878 since Jul 2009
Thanks Given: 1,450
Thanks Received: 3,335

The claim of only taking high probability trades always gets me too. I've created a number of systems with high probability trades but yet the overall system is still a loser. But yet within the context of that system I can make the claim that I only take high probability trades.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to MWinfrey for this post:
  #8 (permalink)
 
serac's Avatar
 serac 
Arizona, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: MB Trading
Trading: Cello
Posts: 116 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 321
Thanks Received: 138


vegasfoster View Post
I log all posts on futures.io (formerly BMT) and have calculated that 16.8% of all posts make some sort of statistical claim. Of the 16.8%, 68.9% are in fact winners, equating to an expectancy of 11.57%. I also calculate a quantile sigma deviation using the Dr, Scholls method and have found the deviation to be within +/-1.4% over time, so I believe it to be a highly reliable figure for purposes of extrapolating future results. However, I have yet to figure a mechanical/formulaic method to maximize my exit efficiency when reading crappy posts. I still have a tendency to hang on too long and exit way later than I should. That said, with practice I have been able to increase my personal expectancy to 13.26%, but I believe it's primarily the results of thousands of hours of screen time as opposed to some "Holy Grail" of crappy post filtering. Hope that helps.

You might try running a Beysian particle filter on your output using a $300/month proprietary expert review subscription ( www.uber-bigmike.com) as the a priori initialization to increase the expectancy by increasing the entrance efficiency. Works for me. I have a personal expectancy of 13.28%.

Great post...

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)
 
shodson's Avatar
 shodson 
OC, California, USA
Quantoholic
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: IB/TWS, NinjaTrader, ToS
Broker: IB, ToS, Kinetick
Trading: stocks, options, futures, VIX
Posts: 1,976 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 533
Thanks Received: 3,709


Eric j View Post
I avoid saying "high probabilty" because shodson might lambaste me LOL

My lambaste gun is cocked and loaded

For sure, probability of success is just one piece of the equation to profitability. If I take a trade with a 1 tick target and a 100 tick stop it will have a very high probability of hitting my target, but it probably (pun-ny) won't be profitable over time.

Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)
 Upupandaway 
Dallas/Tx
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Trading: CL Crude Oil
Posts: 281 since Sep 2011
Thanks Given: 168
Thanks Received: 166


"Am I dumb, or am I overthinking this? "

Brother I understand. I know exactly where you are coming from. I have felt this very same way before, and alot. This trading thing in my personal opinion can not be statistically measured in any sense. I do believe that the men and women who can refer to their trades in some sorta of statistcal sense, are only those who have thousands of hours of screen time. They have learned through trial in error which trade or trades to filter out. They base this only on the pure and simple fact, that they have seen that trade a hundred times, and have been burnt from it a hundred times. And even though it fit every rule they got. It's just not a winner, and they have learned to just not take that trade. They can do what no computer can, which is take everything they have, all the tools that they have, and screen time that they have, and just filter out those trades which are not going to work.

You can not teach discretion. You can not read a book, or follow a rule to gain your own style, it has to be won painfully through failure, and alot of screen time. It can be done. Your not stupid your just finding your style and that takes time. If it weren't so, I'd of told you different.

1. Price action.
2. Indicators are helpful, but you have to learn when the rules can be broken, and cant be broken.
3. Money Managment.
4. Fibonacci Retracements and extensions work, but not because Fibonacci works. It only works becasue a large majority of traders use it.
5. MA work, but not because MA work, but becasue a large majority of traders use them.
6. You have to learn when all of these tools rules can be broken, and when they are being obeyed.
7. What news is important to your paticular market? Better know it, or could be a bad day for you.
8. Whats said on the TV your listening to might move the market, but you cant trade it.
9. Contract rollover date, know it, or else.

These are alot of the things that I continually go over in my head. Becasue I have been burnt on all of them many times over. These 9 things are my own personal disaster waiting to happen. For whatever reason I just continually broke them. I felt really stupid, what the hell was I thinking?? I just went short again and the 50 ma is long WAYYYY LONG. Ever done it? Sure you have, we all have.

In my own case and personal opinion you have to find your own style. Nothing else will do.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to Upupandaway for this post:





Last Updated on January 1, 2012


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts