VantagePoint - Predicting the Market?? - Trading Reviews and Vendors | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


VantagePoint - Predicting the Market??
Updated: Views / Replies:20,651 / 19
Created: by gomad Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors Ė all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you donít need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

VantagePoint - Predicting the Market??

  #1 (permalink)
Elite Member
Tirgu Mures, Romania
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja
Broker/Data: ZenFire
Favorite Futures: CL, GC
 
Posts: 36 since Sep 2010
Thanks: 42 given, 6 received

VantagePoint - Predicting the Market??

Hello,

I am interested to know if there are members who are using or used VantagePoint software in their trading. It is supposed to predict the market with an accuracy of about 75-80%.

It is quite expensive - about $3,000 and before looking more into it I would love to hear more from traders who are using it.

Here is their webpage VantagePoint : Intermarket Analysis Trading Software for Futures, Forex and Stocks

Thank you
GoMad

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to gomad for this post:
 
  #2 (permalink)
Quick Summary
Quick Summary Post

Quick Summary is created and edited by users like you... Add FAQ's, Links and other Relevant Information by clicking the edit button in the lower right hand corner of this message.

 
  #3 (permalink)
Elite Member
Berlin, Europe
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, MultiCharts
Broker/Data: Interactive Brokers
Favorite Futures: Keyboard
 
Fat Tails's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,651 since Mar 2010
Thanks: 4,226 given, 25,597 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary


It is an oldtimer of intermarket analysis. Expensive. Most people hate it, some are convinced that they have found the holy grail.

You can scan the following reviews to get an impression.

Trader Tech | Vantage Point Software | TraderTech.com reviews and ratings by Forex Peace Army

Product Review: VantagePoint Software @ Forex Factory

Trading Reviews - Software - Market Technologies | Trade2Win


You might also first read a book by Louis Mendelsohn, the creator of Vantage Point, to get a personal impression.

Amazon.com: Trend Forecasting with Intermarket Analysis: Predicting Global Markets with Technical Analysis (Trade Secrets (Marketplace Books)) (9781592803323): Mendelsohn, Louis B.: Books

Amazon.com: Forex Trading Using Intermarket Analysis (9781592802951): Louis B. Mendelsohn: Books

I would not use it, as I do not believe in holy grails. But I do not know the software, so you should rather listen to others.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to Fat Tails for this post:
 
  #4 (permalink)
Elite Member
Tirgu Mures, Romania
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja
Broker/Data: ZenFire
Favorite Futures: CL, GC
 
Posts: 36 since Sep 2010
Thanks: 42 given, 6 received

Thank you

Fat Tails,

Thank you so much for your recommendations. I really appreciate that you took the time to give me all the links. This is very helpful.

GoMad

Reply With Quote
 
  #5 (permalink)
 Vendor: www.ninjaterminal.com 
Austin, TX
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker/Data: Optimus Futures/Rithmic
Favorite Futures: Futures [ZB]
 
Posts: 36 since Sep 2009
Thanks: 12 given, 22 received

I haven't used VantagePoint, but my father did, then it was $5,000, and it's basically a trend follower. But the trend is really, really long. So you better hope you have some capital to spare after shelling out $3k for this, because you're going to need to be able to take a lot of drawdown and stick with a trade for a long time.

If you have any questions about NinjaTerminal please send me a Private Message.
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to zwentz for this post:
 
  #6 (permalink)
Elite Member
Lagos, Nigeria
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader, SierraChart
Favorite Futures: Euro Currency & Oil
 
lolu's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,440 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 999 given, 1,595 received


zwentz View Post
I haven't used VantagePoint, but my father did, then it was $5,000, and it's basically a trend follower. But the trend is really, really long. So you better hope you have some capital to spare after shelling out $3k for this, because you're going to need to be able to take a lot of drawdown and stick with a trade for a long time.

Swing trading; Right ?

Lolu

Reply With Quote
 
  #7 (permalink)
 Vendor: www.ninjaterminal.com 
Austin, TX
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker/Data: Optimus Futures/Rithmic
Favorite Futures: Futures [ZB]
 
Posts: 36 since Sep 2009
Thanks: 12 given, 22 received


lolu View Post
Swing trading; Right ?

Lolu

Yes. But very long swings haha.

If you have any questions about NinjaTerminal please send me a Private Message.
Reply With Quote
 
  #8 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Portland, Oregon, USA
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Write my own software
Favorite Futures: Stocks
 
Posts: 2 since May 2011
Thanks: 0 given, 13 received

Beware of claims such as "75%-80% accurate"

In the case of VantagePoint, the claim (which is no doubt correct but meaningless and deceiving) is that the "predicted neural index" can predict with an average accuracy of 78.2% whether the 3-day SMA of typical price (composite of the high, low, and close) two trading days in the future will be higher or lower than the current 3-day SMA of typical price. They use paid consultants to back this up and to imply that it's a fabulous feat. It's not.

The current 3-day SMA of typical price comprises nine data points (three days' worth of high, low, and close), and eight of those data points are in the past. So there's information right now that, using no neural networks or indicators of any kind, is sufficient to predict whether the 3-day SMA of typical price two days in the future will be higher or lower than the current value. That information is the current close--where it is in relation to the current 3-day SMA of typical price plus where it is in relation to today's typical price (which will become one-third of the 3-day SMA of typical price two days in the future).

I wrote a program that predicts the future 3-day SMA of typical price by assuming that the next two days will each have a typical price equal to today's close (which, on average, is true over any large sample). This produced an average accuracy of (drum roll please) 78.27% when applied to ten years' of data for seven random high-volume stocks and seven random futures markets. This result is precisely as useful as being able to predict whether the close two days from now will be higher or lower than today's close with an accuracy of 50%.

Reply With Quote
The following 9 users say Thank You to bfitch for this post:
 
  #9 (permalink)
Elite Member
Houston,Tx
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker/Data: Mirus Futures/Zen-Fire
Favorite Futures: TF
 
ThatManFromTexas's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,302 since Feb 2010
Thanks: 1,208 given, 4,293 received


bfitch View Post
In the case of VantagePoint, the claim (which is no doubt correct but meaningless and deceiving) is that the "predicted neural index" can predict with an average accuracy of 78.2% whether the 3-day SMA of typical price (composite of the high, low, and close) two trading days in the future will be higher or lower than the current 3-day SMA of typical price. They use paid consultants to back this up and to imply that it's a fabulous feat. It's not.

The current 3-day SMA of typical price comprises nine data points (three days' worth of high, low, and close), and eight of those data points are in the past. So there's information right now that, using no neural networks or indicators of any kind, is sufficient to predict whether the 3-day SMA of typical price two days in the future will be higher or lower than the current value. That information is the current close--where it is in relation to the current 3-day SMA of typical price plus where it is in relation to today's typical price (which will become one-third of the 3-day SMA of typical price two days in the future).

I wrote a program that predicts the future 3-day SMA of typical price by assuming that the next two days will each have a typical price equal to today's close (which, on average, is true over any large sample). This produced an average accuracy of (drum roll please) 78.27% when applied to ten years' of data for seven random high-volume stocks and seven random futures markets. This result is precisely as useful as being able to predict whether the close two days from now will be higher or lower than today's close with an accuracy of 50%.

How much to subscribe to your room ....

I'm just a simple man trading a simple plan.

My daddy always said, "Every day above ground is a good day!"
Reply With Quote
 
  #10 (permalink)
Elite Member
Tirgu Mures, Romania
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja
Broker/Data: ZenFire
Favorite Futures: CL, GC
 
Posts: 36 since Sep 2010
Thanks: 42 given, 6 received

Thank you



bfitch View Post
In the case of VantagePoint, the claim (which is no doubt correct but meaningless and deceiving) is that the "predicted neural index" can predict with an average accuracy of 78.2% whether the 3-day SMA of typical price (composite of the high, low, and close) two trading days in the future will be higher or lower than the current 3-day SMA of typical price. They use paid consultants to back this up and to imply that it's a fabulous feat. It's not.

The current 3-day SMA of typical price comprises nine data points (three days' worth of high, low, and close), and eight of those data points are in the past. So there's information right now that, using no neural networks or indicators of any kind, is sufficient to predict whether the 3-day SMA of typical price two days in the future will be higher or lower than the current value. That information is the current close--where it is in relation to the current 3-day SMA of typical price plus where it is in relation to today's typical price (which will become one-third of the 3-day SMA of typical price two days in the future).

I wrote a program that predicts the future 3-day SMA of typical price by assuming that the next two days will each have a typical price equal to today's close (which, on average, is true over any large sample). This produced an average accuracy of (drum roll please) 78.27% when applied to ten years' of data for seven random high-volume stocks and seven random futures markets. This result is precisely as useful as being able to predict whether the close two days from now will be higher or lower than today's close with an accuracy of 50%.

Hi bfitch,

Thank you very much for your explanations. It is good to understand more about what the program actually does.

Is the program you wrote available?

gomad

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to gomad for this post:

Reply



futures io > > > VantagePoint - Predicting the Market??

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Linda Bradford Raschke: Reading The Tape

Elite only

Adam Grimes: TBA

Elite only

NinjaTrader: TBA

January

Ran Aroussi: TBA

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does every stock market in the world have market maker/specialist? lokgotkent Traders Hideout 4 June 18th, 2011 08:22 AM
Predicting Price Action trendisyourfriend The Elite Circle 8 December 22nd, 2010 06:03 PM
Can we trade without predicting ? trendisyourfriend Traders Hideout 8 September 10th, 2010 05:02 AM
Predicting a crossover or moving average for next bar Trader.Jon NinjaTrader Programming 10 April 11th, 2010 11:11 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-12-11 in 0.14 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.226.113.250