Let me get this straight: Stacey watched their public videos they made for advertising, was able to guess something about their system, and shared those guesses here. What's the problem?
If Stacey had signed an NDA or something then you could criticize and maybe sue him or her for breaking an agreement.
But discussing publicly available information (the videos) and even trying to reverse engineer a system from it, is perfectly OK. There is no moral imperative for Stacey to keep quiet, and Stacey certainly didn't 'steal' anything from anyone.
The following 3 users say Thank You to GoldStandard for this post:
are we in russia or china now? i dont like to be censored and whats rude to one is not rude to another, we are having a debate about if stacy trying to figure out a system thats been around for years in one form or another and is on videos for everyone to see is ethical or not albiet we are off topic but i dont see why you get to decide what we can post or not then whats the sense of posting anything??? sharky
KILLING THE MARKETS DAILY
The following user says Thank You to sharky for this post:
No, we are on futures.io (formerly BMT), i'm sorry if u fell censored, but it' isn't! Your debate was rude, offensive, useless and not positive, this allow me to decide to remove posts! You can post what u like in a non rude not offensive to others....When these things take the control there's no more constructive discussion. If u like this way u can do it on another place, not here.
I hope I was clear! I wouldn't return to this subject, thanks!
Take your Pips, go out and Live.
Luke.
The following 3 users say Thank You to LukeGeniol for this post:
it wasnt me being rude i was simply sticking up for stacy and you did censor us and ive been here since before bmt even started up you should have moved it to off topic not just simply deleted all the post from that discussion like i said what is rude to one is not always rude to another...sharky
KILLING THE MARKETS DAILY
The following user says Thank You to sharky for this post:
The Sniper thread or system has been gaining more visibility. Some did purchase .. some are considering .. and some want to create a similar set-up on their own. Let's respect one's personal choice.
What have been said are legitimate. We have hundreds of indicators available everywhere. One just needs to decide what to use and creates his/her trading system. I can tell the paid subscribers are a little upset when there's a post trying to guess the set-up details. It's a very normal reaction as these happy campers consider themselves as part of the Sniper family. No worries .. guesses are guesses.
I believe Stacey's sharing does not mean to violate any intellectual property. Rather more on feeding the curiosity raised. To have an effective/profitable set-up for less than $100 (+ free room access for a month) certainly aroused skeptical first impression. Please bear in mind that it's a special intro offer (very common practice for a new business) and will end soon.
When I read the eBook for the first time, I had the same thought too. If you have visited my thread, you will notice my never-ending efforts in searching an almost 100% profitable system with fancy indicators. I had been using tons of indicators to double- and triple-confirm a signal. I loved having safety wheels (hundreds of them if I may) so that I would not lose.
It's all in past tense now that I am happy with a simple method yet effective. It's a breakthrough for me that I can trade with 2 lines for trend direction and 1 osc indicator. Will it be for you? It really depends on your trading style and preference.
Beth
Good Trading is about Trading Right!
Want What the Market Wants!
Trade With the Trend!
The following 4 users say Thank You to wgreenie for this post:
