Teton Order Routing versus CQG - futures io
futures io



Teton Order Routing versus CQG


Discussion in Trading Reviews and Vendors

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Ironbeam with 2 posts (6 thanks)
    2. looks_two kulu with 1 posts (1 thanks)
    3. looks_3 empty with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Koepisch with 1 posts (4 thanks)
    1. trending_up 766 views
    2. thumb_up 11 thanks given
    3. group 7 followers
    1. forum 5 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 125,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Teton Order Routing versus CQG

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
 kulu 
Buckeye Nation
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja Trader
Broker: Amp/CQG, TOS
Trading: CL, 6E, YM and ES
 
Posts: 212 since Jul 2010
Thanks: 159 given, 242 received

Happy New Year,

Does anyone here us Teton Order Routing? How does it compare to CQG?

Thanks

Started this thread Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to kulu for this post:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Tick counter that works with directions?
NinjaTrader
Emini Trading Levels
Emini and Emicro Index
Take Profit/ Tpx during crypto futures trading
Crypto Futures
 
 
(login for full post details)
  #2 (permalink)
 Ironbeam   is a Vendor
 
 
Ironbeam's Avatar
 
Posts: 71 since Jan 2018
Thanks: 39 given, 70 received

According to Sierra's benchmarking test on Teton vs. CQG Web API, order submission can take up to 11.5 times longer on CQG. Whether that can be really substantiated is unclear. There are many factors that go into latency for order submission.

As for other and more direct benefits, there is no $.10 routing fee or monthly connection premium that other vendors like CQG and Rithmic charge, and there are some nice back-end tools that are helpful to control risk and margins more easily from a broker standpoint.

Feel free to reach out with any questions. (312) 765 7228. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading futures and options. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Full Details.
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to Ironbeam for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #3 (permalink)
 Koepisch 
@ Germany
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus Futures/Zen-Fire
Trading: FDAX
 
Posts: 534 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 391 given, 476 received


Hi,

i don't use the service yet, but i will be in the SC webinar today about the topic ("Sierra Chart Teton Order Routing at Edge Clear" @EdgeClear). I have to wait till the EUREX connection is completed. In the SC Board there is an excellent thread which describes the differences and implementation details of the new order routing service. It's quite a good read!

https://www.sierrachart.com/SupportBoard.php?ThreadID=69450

Koepisch

Reply With Quote
The following 4 users say Thank You to Koepisch for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #4 (permalink)
 empty 
Louisville, Kentucky
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Sierra Chart, TastyTrade
Broker: Various
Trading: Futures, Options
 
empty's Avatar
 
Posts: 100 since Oct 2012
Thanks: 1,935 given, 195 received


Ironbeam View Post
According to Sierra's benchmarking test on Teton vs. CQG Web API, order submission can take up to 11.5 times longer on CQG. Whether that can be really substantiated is unclear. There are many factors that go into latency for order submission.

As for other and more direct benefits, there is no $.10 routing fee or monthly connection premium that other vendors like CQG and Rithmic charge, and there are some nice back-end tools that are helpful to control risk and margins more easily from a broker standpoint.

When will IronBeam offer support?

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #5 (permalink)
 Ironbeam   is a Vendor
 
 
Ironbeam's Avatar
 
Posts: 71 since Jan 2018
Thanks: 39 given, 70 received


empty View Post
When will IronBeam offer support?

We are completing the integration this weekend and plan on doing some testing Monday before offering it to all customers either Tuesday or Wednesday.

Feel free to reach out with any questions. (312) 765 7228. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading futures and options. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Full Details.
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 4 users say Thank You to Ironbeam for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #6 (permalink)
 Popsicle 
Pretoria Gauteng
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Sierra Charts
Trading: NQ
 
Popsicle's Avatar
 
Posts: 250 since May 2016
Thanks: 2,448 given, 547 received

I see that AMP support is coming up. Any idea on timeline on that?

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote


futures io Trading Community Trading Reviews and Vendors > Teton Order Routing versus CQG


Last Updated on January 16, 2022


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!

Ongoing
     



Copyright © 2022 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada), info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts