NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Friendly vendor competition?


Discussion in Trading Reviews and Vendors

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Dionysus with 8 posts (8 thanks)
    2. looks_two kevinkdog with 6 posts (14 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Inletcap with 4 posts (2 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Big Mike with 4 posts (8 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one shodson with 3 thanks per post
    2. looks_two kevinkdog with 2.3 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Big Mike with 2 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Dionysus with 1 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 8,549 views
    2. thumb_up 38 thanks given
    3. group 8 followers
    1. forum 28 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Friendly vendor competition?

  #1 (permalink)
 Dionysus 
Monterey, CA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninjatrader
Trading: CL
Posts: 80 since Jan 2014
Thanks Given: 28
Thanks Received: 99

After the recent talk about just how much the trading marketplace seems to be overflowing with style-over-substance sites and products and vendors, and how many of them focus entirely on shrewd marketing as opposed to developing a working product, I was thinking that this forum might be in a unique position to help clear these muddied waters. This is just an idea, but I thought I'd throw it out there to see if it gained any traction. . .

What if we were to create/host a friendly ongoing competition that stripped away all of the nonsense and hype and potential for excuses, and allowed vendors to test their logic on a level playing field, keeping careful track of the results? This means a hands-off, automated strategy competition. I envision this competition to be similar to the automated strategy competitions that have been hosted on this forum before, with one VITAL caveat: Instead of having strategies that trade once or twice a week, sometimes even less, we would set a minimum of in-market-time per week, that, if not hit, would disqualify the competitor (or financial penalize somehow)? A calculation for each trade, such as "NumberOfContracts * TimeInMarket = X", and then we simply sum together all X values, for a cumulative total of single-contract-market-minutes, which I think is a decent overall gauge of market exposure, and a means to force enough market exposure to claim that the strategies have been properly tested. I'd hope that most vendors selling automated strategies should be able to put together a portfolio/grouping of strategies that are active enough to meet the minimum cutoff that would be established.

I'd want to add this caveat because it forces a much more accurate and efficient test of the abilities of a trader. Anyone can attain a nice net profit over a tiny handful of trades, even coasting on pure randomness and chaos, just as anyone can flip 'heads' 8 or 9 times out of 10, if given a few tries to do so. . but nobody is going to flip heads 900 times out of 1000 anytime soon. The randomness/chaos/chance decreases exponentially, of course, as the data pool increases.

This type of competition would be as close as we could come to an objective measure of actual EDGE encompassed within the products of these vendors. The winner would be whomever had the highest net profit at the end of the time period (perhaps approximately a month, or two?), and very clear and direct statistics could be updated regularly to show how the competition was progressing. Those vendors who did compete could have their net-profit balances permanently listed somewhere, immortalized for all to see, and if they performed well, I'd imagine this would be a significant boon for business.

I'd think any vendor with an effective and consistent product would jump at the chance to prove himself in such a public manner, and I really do envision a friendly competition, where all who are willing to face off are lauded by the community for doing so. . would be nice if it could be entirely friendly and supportive, and all-around positive in nature.

I'd even be willing to take an active role in setup and management of the competition, (though the 'playing field' should be an objective arbiter like Sam or someone else trusted implicitly by the community with a VPS to offer), and/or would absolutely love to compete myself, as I thrive on (friendly) competition. . would also be more than willing to help track down some other competitors.

That is, IF there is any real interest in this amongst futures.io (formerly BMT)'ers. . . I'd love to hear your thoughts, Mike, first and foremost. I DO think its possible to help reorient the marketplace a bit, in the direction of one where vendors rise or fall based upon merit and ability, as opposed to shrewdness, manipulation and exaggeration carrying the day.

Thoughts?

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Futures True Range Report
The Elite Circle
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
New Micros: Ultra 10-Year & Ultra T-Bond -- Live Now
Treasury Notes and Bonds
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
Are there any eval firms that allow you to sink to your …
Traders Hideout
 

  #3 (permalink)
 
Inletcap's Avatar
 Inletcap 
Murrells Inlet SC
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Trading: ES, CL, ETFs
Posts: 9,159 since Dec 2012
Thanks Given: 9,765
Thanks Received: 26,036


I will be following this thread.. I wonder how many swill sign up. Prove your worth and get free advertising- seems like a no brainier! The results would/will be amazing!

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 50,393 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,172
Thanks Received: 101,530

It will never work. How many of these vendors prove their skill by posting broker statements (at a minimum)? Answer: none.

What you are asking for is the same. None will agree.

Sent from my phone

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list
Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Exclusive money saving offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #5 (permalink)
 Dionysus 
Monterey, CA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninjatrader
Trading: CL
Posts: 80 since Jan 2014
Thanks Given: 28
Thanks Received: 99

I fear you might be right, Mike. . . but the situation can't be all that bad, can it?

Is this truly a marketplace where virtually nothing of actual value is sold? Is it really a case where the marketplace is 99% snake oil salesmen trying to out-manipulate one another, all style and no substance, a complete and total sham across the board?

Even if they agreed to the challenge, and put in a decent showing. . even hovering around breakeven. . . this would at least be free publicity, and their foot in the door. . their name and website getting out there for public consumption, in exchange for their willingness to at least try to prove themselves and their products.

Is it really that grim?

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 50,393 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,172
Thanks Received: 101,530

Snakeoil is one thing, you can have good intentions and most likely still be a terrible trader.

When it comes to selling stuff, I think you need to demand proof they are good -- broker statements and real time documented trades that match the statements.

Sent from my phone

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list
Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Exclusive money saving offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #7 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,645 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,890
Thanks Received: 7,338

I'd participate.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)
 Dionysus 
Monterey, CA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninjatrader
Trading: CL
Posts: 80 since Jan 2014
Thanks Given: 28
Thanks Received: 99


kevinkdog View Post
I'd participate.

Very happy to hear it. . .

I can try to coax some vendors out of their hidey-holes, but if all else failed, Kevin, I'd love for even just us to go toe to toe (though perhaps we can find one or two or three more takers on this forum), via a drastically scaled up competition where we pit portfolio vs portfolio, as opposed to single infrequently traded strategy against other infrequently traded strategy.

I personally believe (and I'm interested to know whether you feel the same) that its difficult to judge a trader, or his systematic trading abilities, or his specific strategies, until you have a data pool of at least a few hundred trades to look at.

I can remember when I first arrived here, the attitude towards mechanical trading seemed so hopeless and cynical. . . would love to see either (or both) of us prove that this doesn't need to be the case, and perhaps help give others hope to tread down this path with the additional confidence of knowing it *is* possible to have real success as a systematic trader, with a bit of effort, discipline, and help from others.

I'm still hoping I can find a brave vendor, somewhere, somehow. . .

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,645 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,890
Thanks Received: 7,338


Dionysus View Post
Very happy to hear it. . .

I can try to coax some vendors out of their hidey-holes, but if all else failed, Kevin, I'd love for even just us to go toe to toe (though perhaps we can find one or two or three more takers on this forum), via a drastically scaled up competition where we pit portfolio vs portfolio, as opposed to single infrequently traded strategy against other infrequently traded strategy.

I personally believe (and I'm interested to know whether you feel the same) that its difficult to judge a trader, or his systematic trading abilities, or his specific strategies, until you have a data pool of at least a few hundred trades to look at.

I can remember when I first arrived here, the attitude towards mechanical trading seemed so hopeless and cynical. . . would love to see either (or both) of us prove that this doesn't need to be the case, and perhaps help give others hope to tread down this path with the additional confidence of knowing it *is* possible to have real success as a systematic trader, with a bit of effort, discipline, and help from others.

I'm still hoping I can find a brave vendor, somewhere, somehow. . .

I'll participate in the originally stated contest - a vendor face off.

A members versus other members contest sounds like the Battle of The Bot contest, which was discontinued for lack of member participation.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)
 
Inletcap's Avatar
 Inletcap 
Murrells Inlet SC
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Trading: ES, CL, ETFs
Posts: 9,159 since Dec 2012
Thanks Given: 9,765
Thanks Received: 26,036



Dionysus View Post
Very happy to hear it. . .

I can try to coax some vendors out of their hidey-holes, but if all else failed, Kevin, I'd love for even just us to go toe to toe (though perhaps we can find one or two or three more takers on this forum), via a drastically scaled up competition where we pit portfolio vs portfolio, as opposed to single infrequently traded strategy against other infrequently traded strategy.

I personally believe (and I'm interested to know whether you feel the same) that its difficult to judge a trader, or his systematic trading abilities, or his specific strategies, until you have a data pool of at least a few hundred trades to look at.

I can remember when I first arrived here, the attitude towards mechanical trading seemed so hopeless and cynical. . . would love to see either (or both) of us prove that this doesn't need to be the case, and perhaps help give others hope to tread down this path with the additional confidence of knowing it *is* possible to have real success as a systematic trader, with a bit of effort, discipline, and help from others.

I'm still hoping I can find a brave vendor, somewhere, somehow. . .

I know they exist, but I would just like to see one profitable system.. Just one realistic and profitable system and my life would be complete!

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote





Last Updated on January 13, 2016


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts