Friendly vendor competition? - Trading Reviews and Vendors | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


Friendly vendor competition?
Updated: Views / Replies:2,784 / 28
Created: by Dionysus Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors Ė all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you donít need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

Friendly vendor competition?

  #11 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker/Data: various
Favorite Futures: futures
 
Posts: 2,347 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,101 given, 4,257 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary


Inletcap View Post
I know they exist, but I would just like to see one profitable system.. Just one realistic and profitable system and my life would be complete!

Rather than looking for that one strategy, I always recommend that people develop it themselves (even it is just someone else's work, but modified by you). In the long run, that is the best way to go...

If you have any questions please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io "Ask Me Anything" thread
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
  #12 (permalink)
Elite Member
Murrells Inlet SC
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Favorite Futures: ES, CL, ETFs
 
Inletcap's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,158 since Dec 2012
Thanks: 9,765 given, 25,571 received


kevinkdog View Post
Rather than looking for that one strategy, I always recommend that people develop it themselves (even it is just someone else's work, but modified by you). In the long run, that is the best way to go...

Gave up on that years ago- as stated, I just want to see one working system. Seems like when you throw that out there, the common reply is what you said "develop yourself". Maybe one day someone will share one that they believe in.

Reply With Quote
 
  #13 (permalink)
Site Administrator
Manta, Ecuador
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: My own custom solution
Favorite Futures: E-mini ES S&P 500
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,041 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 29,184 given, 82,300 received



Inletcap View Post
Gave up on that years ago- as stated, I just want to see one working system. Seems like when you throw that out there, the common reply is what you said "develop yourself". Maybe one day someone will share one that they believe in.

Check out @kevinkdog's threads and webinars. He has good material and has openly shared a great deal.

But how do you qualify a "working system"? How many times do you interfere with the system and still call it a system? How many times do you adjust parameters, or adjust which days it trades, or change the signals (always gotta "add a filter").

Even systems are largely discretionary in the way the manager of the system controls it or alters it or directs it.

Something that is rarely discussed on futures.io (formerly BMT) for whatever reason is portfolio trading using an algorithmic system with predefined rules. I still believe portfolio trading is basically the holy grail.

Automate this, for example, as a starting point:

https://futures.io/elite-circle/21967-developing-gtaa-system.html

Mike

Due to time constraints, please do not PM me if your question can be resolved or answered on the forum.

Need help?
1) Stop changing things. No new indicators, charts, or methods. Be consistent with what is in front of you first.
2) Start a journal and post to it daily with the trades you made to show your strengths and weaknesses.
3) Set goals for yourself to reach daily. Make them about how you trade, not how much money you make.
4) Accept responsibility for your actions. Stop looking elsewhere to explain away poor performance.
5) Where to start as a trader? Watch this webinar and read this thread for hundreds of questions and answers.
6)
Help using the forum? Watch this video to learn general tips on using the site.

If you want
to support our community, become an Elite Member.

Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to Big Mike for this post:
 
  #14 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker/Data: various
Favorite Futures: futures
 
Posts: 2,347 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,101 given, 4,257 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary


Inletcap View Post
Gave up on that years ago- as stated, I just want to see one working system. Seems like when you throw that out there, the common reply is what you said "develop yourself". Maybe one day someone will share one that they believe in.


Sorry if you feel I gave you bad advice by saying "develop it yourself." I won't make that mistake again.

If you have any questions please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io "Ask Me Anything" thread
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
  #15 (permalink)
 Vendor: www.probabletrades.com 
OC, California, USA
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: IB/TWS, NinjaTrader, thinkorswim
Favorite Futures: stocks, options, futures, VIX
 
shodson's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,848 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 474 given, 3,233 received


Dionysus View Post
What if we were to create/host a friendly ongoing competition that stripped away all of the nonsense and hype and potential for excuses, and allowed vendors to test their logic on a level playing field, keeping careful track of the results?

Isn't that what this and this are for?

Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to shodson for this post:
 
  #16 (permalink)
Elite Member
Murrells Inlet SC
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Favorite Futures: ES, CL, ETFs
 
Inletcap's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,158 since Dec 2012
Thanks: 9,765 given, 25,571 received


kevinkdog View Post
Sorry if you feel I gave you bad advice by saying "develop it yourself." I won't make that mistake again.

Oh no- I just reread what I wrote and man did that come out wrong. My bad. I'm totally not a dick but that sure sounded like it.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to Inletcap for this post:
 
  #17 (permalink)
Elite Member
Monterey, CA
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninjatrader
Favorite Futures: CL
 
Posts: 80 since Jan 2014
Thanks: 28 given, 91 received


shodson View Post
Isn't that what this and this are for?

Unfortunately no, not quite. . .

The key difference is the point I mentioned earlier, its the difference between gauging the results of just a few trades over a singular strategy, vs testing the performance of an entire portfolio. The fewer the strategies, instruments, markets and number of trades involved in a contest, the less accurate/valuable the results of the competition will be, as an accurate representation of skill/ability, imho.

If 10 users developed a single strategy completely at random, using no logic that they felt to be predictive or useful, and 10 other users spent a great deal of time on their single developed strategies and had great confidence in them, over a tiny number of trades there is a very significant chance a user from the former group would win the contest. . . due to sheer chance, randomness. However, vastly increase this number-of-trades, or time-in-market-of-all-trades-combined, and the chances of the best trader rising to the top increases significantly.

This is what put a slight damper on my excitement towards the battle of the bot competitions specifically. It seemed to me that a competition using such a small data pool is very likely to crown the *luckiest* trader over a short period of time, as opposed to the most skilled trader. . does this make sense?

This is not at all to diminish the importance of that competition, I think it was interesting and novel and useful, and brought some attention to systematic trading as a concept and practice. . . I was merely suggesting what would perhaps be a more comprehensive and exhaustive test of a systematic trader and their methods. I think if we went this route, and a few of us showed solid, consistent success over a reasonable period of time and significant number of trades, it could seriously change the way systematic trading is viewed, and could give others just starting down that path the confidence they need to continue.


Just a thought. . I'll begin the vendor search shortly here to see if I can find a few takers

Reply With Quote
 
  #18 (permalink)
Elite Member
Monterey, CA
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninjatrader
Favorite Futures: CL
 
Posts: 80 since Jan 2014
Thanks: 28 given, 91 received


Big Mike View Post
Check out @kevinkdog's threads and webinars. He has good material and has openly shared a great deal.

But how do you qualify a "working system"? How many times do you interfere with the system and still call it a system? How many times do you adjust parameters, or adjust which days it trades, or change the signals (always gotta "add a filter").

Even systems are largely discretionary in the way the manager of the system controls it or alters it or directs it.

Something that is rarely discussed on futures.io (formerly BMT) for whatever reason is portfolio trading using an algorithmic system with predefined rules. I still believe portfolio trading is basically the holy grail.

Automate this, for example, as a starting point:

https://futures.io/elite-circle/21967-developing-gtaa-system.html

Mike




This is an extremely important point. . . one of the most disturbing things about virtually the entire marketplace of vendors who market strategies, at least those that I've come across thus far, is that they always seem to (wisely, shrewdly, dishonestly) leave some wiggle room . . they leave a few parameters either undefined, or they have some settings that require user involvement, user tinkering. This is brilliant, of course, because when the strategy falls flat (and it almost certainly will, given enough time), the vendor can simply state 'well, you see, you had this setting at X, and it really should have been Y. . . learn from your mistake!'

I don't run a single strategy where every single variable isn't completely hard coded. There's absolutely no wiggle room, I don't change things. . . I have their entry times (time of day, day of week, etc) all hard coded, and its my personal belief that if you're using a decade or more of historical data to craft the strategy, you probably shouldn't be tinkering with it based upon the data from the past week or two or three. . in my experience, those who follow this practice tend to fare very badly.

Any strategy I create has to be a completely finished product, with nothing for me to subjectively or arbitrarily change or tweak over time. . . and I was stunned to see how often this isn't the case, and I'm still curious as to what the reasoning would be for this (leaving 'wiggle room' in a strategy, not setting everything in stone before its launch), other than dishonest (but effective) marketing tactics.

(Making an edit here to encourage users to follow Mike's advice regarding KevDog's posts and webinars, these are practically mandatory reading, imho, for those starting out down this path. . . this community owes him a big 'thank you' for his willingness to so openly share all that he has, as its such a rarity for successful/proven traders to be willing to show so many of their means and methods, concepts and ideas. . )


Last edited by Dionysus; September 17th, 2015 at 04:12 PM. Reason: Noted in post
Reply With Quote
The following 4 users say Thank You to Dionysus for this post:
 
  #19 (permalink)
Market Artist
Portland, United States
 
Futures Experience: None
Platform: Private
Favorite Futures: ES, CL, GC, Currencies, Bonds
 
Posts: 169 since Jun 2015
Thanks: 943 given, 123 received

In my experience, the few vendors I know of that sell profitable systems right out of the box don't actively promote them largely because they don't want every Joe Schmo to have them. Some have some kind of robust "interview" process they make you go through, in addition to legal documents you have to sign before they let you buy.

From my point of view, they seem to be driven by a genuine desire to help people. But they're not willing to help just anyone.

Concerning giving the public access to their broker statements... I can think of several good reasons why the good trader-vendors aren't up for that. Unfortunately this doesn't help anyone build a case for or against them because obviously the bad ones refuse to provide broker statements as well.

Keep things complex. But not more complex then they need to be.
Reply With Quote
 
  #20 (permalink)
Site Administrator
Manta, Ecuador
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: My own custom solution
Favorite Futures: E-mini ES S&P 500
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,041 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 29,184 given, 82,300 received



Portland View Post
In my experience, the few vendors I know of that sell profitable systems right out of the box don't actively promote them largely because they don't want every Joe Schmo to have them. Some have some kind of robust "interview" process they make you go through, in addition to legal documents you have to sign before they let you buy.

In my opinion, anyone that believes that is just naive and lacking all experience and using poor judgment.

Vendors making you sign legal documents is simply to prohibit you from writing about them, including how much of a waste of time it was after you (if you) learn from your mistake.

I'm making generalizations on "systems" that are for sale to retail users for say under $1,000,000.

Mike

Due to time constraints, please do not PM me if your question can be resolved or answered on the forum.

Need help?
1) Stop changing things. No new indicators, charts, or methods. Be consistent with what is in front of you first.
2) Start a journal and post to it daily with the trades you made to show your strengths and weaknesses.
3) Set goals for yourself to reach daily. Make them about how you trade, not how much money you make.
4) Accept responsibility for your actions. Stop looking elsewhere to explain away poor performance.
5) Where to start as a trader? Watch this webinar and read this thread for hundreds of questions and answers.
6)
Help using the forum? Watch this video to learn general tips on using the site.

If you want
to support our community, become an Elite Member.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to Big Mike for this post:

Reply



futures io > > > Friendly vendor competition?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Battlestations: Show us your trading desks and win $750 in prizes

August
 

Ask Me Anything (AMA) w/Rod Casilli @ Collective2

Aug 23
 

Prototyping Python Strategies (part 3, Live Trading) w/Ran Aroussi [1PM ET]

Elite only
 

Develop Strategies and Perfect Execution w/Brannigan Barrett @ Axia Futures

Elite only

Introduction to Phillip Capital futures brokerage services

Aug TBD

How Monte Carlo Analysis Can Help Your Trading w/Kevin Davey

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Travel-friendly trading laptop xelaar Tech Support 25 June 26th, 2015 11:32 AM
Bitcoin hits $700 on friendly Senate hearing Big Mike Cryptocurrency Trading 1 November 18th, 2013 11:49 PM
Friendly challenge question to vendors josh Traders Hideout 26 May 20th, 2013 04:33 AM
'Business-Friendly Bahrain' Disappears; Ex-Pats Exit Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 March 17th, 2011 04:20 AM
Any recommendations on the best, user friendly, online broker pertree Reviews of Brokers and Data Feeds 8 April 8th, 2010 07:53 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 PM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-08-18 in 0.15 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP 23.20.166.142