Al Brooks Trading Course (www.brookstradingcourse.com) - futures io
futures io futures trading



Al Brooks Trading Course (www.brookstradingcourse.com)


Discussion in Trading Reviews and Vendors

Updated by emini2000
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Big Mike with 27 posts (136 thanks)
    2. looks_two emini2000 with 25 posts (32 thanks)
    3. looks_3 IzhakHaim with 23 posts (12 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Rory with 18 posts (30 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Big Mike with 5.0 thanks per post
    2. looks_two bobwest with 4.8 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 SoftSoap with 3.5 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 JonnyBoy with 3.4 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 114,539 views
    2. thumb_up 922 thanks given
    3. group 90 followers
    1. forum 410 replies
    2. attach_file 4 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Al Brooks Trading Course (www.brookstradingcourse.com)

(login for full post details)
  #181 (permalink)
glostrup, denmark
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom platform
Broker: CQG
Trading: Futures, Options, Stocks
 
ktrader's Avatar
 
Posts: 249 since Aug 2011
Thanks: 152 given, 275 received


jodistrict View Post
Al is the most honest educator out there.

In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed is king

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to ktrader for this post:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Think or swim earnings move calculation
Brokers
Scan by comparing SMAs within 5 mins
ThinkOrSwim
Implications of Alex Kearns' suicide
Traders Hideout
TOS script
ThinkOrSwim
Execute NT8-Optimizer by script
NinjaTrader
 
 
(login for full post details)
  #182 (permalink)
Luxembourg, Luxembourg
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TWS
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Stocks
 
Posts: 491 since May 2012
Thanks: 1,641 given, 1,148 received


JonnyBoy View Post
When I dealt with the CFTC after reporting EminiTradingSchool, I asked them this very question at the tail end of our telephone meeting. They stated that it is not against the law to disclose any kind of brokerage statement for public consumption. As long as the brokerage statement is real, representative of the service being sold and above all verifiable (presumably via the broker). The more disclosure when selling a service the better as far as they are concerned.

Quoting an old post here, but my comment relates to disclosure by educators.

Dan Zanger and Mark Minervini both show their performance records and are both educating. Both of them show the best period of their careers and both of them show it in a way to highlight the best aspects of their performance. Dan's track record was verified by an auditor while I have never seen a proper record for Mark - his numbers are only mentioned in Stock Market Wizards.

If it was illegal to disclose performance in this way, they would have been shut down long ago. Considering the higher profile of both of these gentlemen, it is also very unlikely that the regulatory authorities are not aware of them.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #183 (permalink)
Baltimore MD
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB, Kinetics
Trading: E6, ES and CL
 
rwbil's Avatar
 
Posts: 93 since Nov 2012



jodistrict View Post
Al is the most honest educator out there

Based on what? Obviously no proof of any of his claims.

I guess by this logic Bernie Madoff is the most honest person running a Pyramid Scheme.

When will people stopping supporting these con artist that provide no proof of their claims. Until members stand up and demand proof they will be scammed again and again.

Anything else besides proof of ones claims is meaningless.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #184 (permalink)
Bloomington, IL
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Ninja
Trading: YM. ES
 
Posts: 11 since Jan 2011
Thanks: 3 given, 12 received

The vast majority of my career has been spent trading at the institutional level with a reasonable amount of success. Which is to say no one ever asked me to resign, so my employers must have been ok with my trading performance. I have no opinion on Al Brooks, though I suspect he probably falls somewhere in the continuum of retail trading educators.

Toward the latter part of my career, I experienced a brain fart and decided that retail trading education would be an excellent avenue to explore and hung my shingle out as a trading educator. The fact that I have returned to institutional trading should indicate my feelings on retail trading education. I have been a serial lurker on this site for several years and thought I would finally post my ideas on the premise of most retail trading. Here is my thesis: The notion that you are going to take any single trading course and succeed is false. To expound on that notion, the idea that the average new trader is going to learn to trade, then take a small retail account and consistently make money trading reasonably tight stops (as is the normal retail methodology) is pure fiction. Note: There have been several exceptions in my career to that generalization, but these traders are far and few between.

Why?

It is my opinion that trading encompasses a wide variety of skills and knowledge, most of which is learned through experience and a "style of thinking." You can't teach experience and the "thinking" of successful traders is counter-intuitive to the average individual. As a trader, you have to look forward in time. Our entire formal education experience focuses on historical thinking and present day thinking. Whether it's math, science or any other educational discipline, we rely on past theories, data, and analysis to form present day opinions. Trading often gives the illusion of data adherence, but eventually, the "historical trading" grinds your account into "blown" status. The success record speaks for itself, a 90%+ failure rate for new traders. I suspect the same failure rate exists among traders who have taken a course in trading, or read a book about trading and been personally mentored by a trader.

Traders are fooled by randomness into seeing discernable trading signals.

My advice? Learn as much as you can about a wide variety of trading styles and don't put too much stock in any of them. You should also spend 5 years watching the market studiously and trading. Learn as much as you can about random markets and probability because in the final analysis, that is what trading is about. Journal each trade and classify the entry and exit, then note results. You can get a crude idea of the probability of your own personal entries success/failure rate. Note the type of market each signal occurred. Keep refining that method. Sheesh, it sounds overwhelming. It is. I suspect that Al Brooks's course would be a valuable aid in learning price action trading. Unfortunately, if you focus solely on price action trading you will eventually miss the boat. Does that make the course bad? Nope, not hardly. Price action trading is a piece of the puzzle and you would be wise to learn this style of trading. There may be days when this is the only trading knowledge/experience that will produce results. Is it going to be the way to go every day? Probably not.

Ultimately, my attempt at trading education failed. I couldn't teach experience. I could not trade tight stops consistently (see randomness). I was unable to teach a trader's state of mind. My success rate in trading training was about 25% of the people enrolled. Not very impressive. The failed traders were often pissed off, and I had no answers for them.

New traders want to see results fast. They want to copy trades. They want to make money. No one has a solution for those unrealistic variables. Not me, not Al Brooks, no one; but that is the formula the retail trading business is trying to market. There are no quick results, copying trades is difficult, and the failure rate is abysmal.

Are trading educators scammers? A lot of them are, but I know some that are pretty good intentioned.

For me, returning to trading in the style I learned has produced the results I have come to expect. I can let trades run against me for a bit and not bail. I only need to get the mid-term trend right, and that takes patience and institutional sized trading accounts. Of course, when the market moves with you from the onset, it sure is a lot easier. Be well.

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 10 users say Thank You to trader7757 for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #185 (permalink)
Baltimore MD
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB, Kinetics
Trading: E6, ES and CL
 
rwbil's Avatar
 
Posts: 93 since Nov 2012


trader7757 View Post
The vast majority of my career has been spent trading at the institutional level with a reasonable amount of success. Which is to say no one ever asked me to resign, so my employers must have been ok with my trading performance. I have no opinion on Al Brooks, though I suspect he probably falls somewhere in the continuum of retail trading educators.

Toward the latter part of my career, I experienced a brain fart and decided that retail trading education would be an excellent avenue to explore and hung my shingle out as a trading educator. The fact that I have returned to institutional trading should indicate my feelings on retail trading education. I have been a serial lurker on this site for several years and thought I would finally post my ideas on the premise of most retail trading. Here is my thesis: The notion that you are going to take any single trading course and succeed is false. To expound on that notion, the idea that the average new trader is going to learn to trade, then take a small retail account and consistently make money trading reasonably tight stops (as is the normal retail methodology) is pure fiction. Note: There have been several exceptions in my career to that generalization, but these traders are far and few between.

Why?

It is my opinion that trading encompasses a wide variety of skills and knowledge, most of which is learned through experience and a "style of thinking." You can't teach experience and the "thinking" of successful traders is counter-intuitive to the average individual. As a trader, you have to look forward in time. Our entire formal education experience focuses on historical thinking and present day thinking. Whether it's math, science or any other educational discipline, we rely on past theories, data, and analysis to form present day opinions. Trading often gives the illusion of data adherence, but eventually, the "historical trading" grinds your account into "blown" status. The success record speaks for itself, a 90%+ failure rate for new traders. I suspect the same failure rate exists among traders who have taken a course in trading, or read a book about trading and been personally mentored by a trader.

Traders are fooled by randomness into seeing discernable trading signals.

My advice? Learn as much as you can about a wide variety of trading styles and don't put too much stock in any of them. You should also spend 5 years watching the market studiously and trading. Learn as much as you can about random markets and probability because in the final analysis, that is what trading is about. Journal each trade and classify the entry and exit, then note results. You can get a crude idea of the probability of your own personal entries success/failure rate. Note the type of market each signal occurred. Keep refining that method. Sheesh, it sounds overwhelming. It is. I suspect that Al Brooks's course would be a valuable aid in learning price action trading. Unfortunately, if you focus solely on price action trading you will eventually miss the boat. Does that make the course bad? Nope, not hardly. Price action trading is a piece of the puzzle and you would be wise to learn this style of trading. There may be days when this is the only trading knowledge/experience that will produce results. Is it going to be the way to go every day? Probably not.

Ultimately, my attempt at trading education failed. I couldn't teach experience. I could not trade tight stops consistently (see randomness). I was unable to teach a trader's state of mind. My success rate in trading training was about 25% of the people enrolled. Not very impressive. The failed traders were often pissed off, and I had no answers for them.

New traders want to see results fast. They want to copy trades. They want to make money. No one has a solution for those unrealistic variables. Not me, not Al Brooks, no one; but that is the formula the retail trading business is trying to market. There are no quick results, copying trades is difficult, and the failure rate is abysmal.

Are trading educators scammers? A lot of them are, but I know some that are pretty good intentioned.

For me, returning to trading in the style I learned has produced the results I have come to expect. I can let trades run against me for a bit and not bail. I only need to get the mid-term trend right, and that takes patience and institutional sized trading accounts. Of course, when the market moves with you from the onset, it sure is a lot easier. Be well.

I agree with a lot of what you said, especially,

"average new trader is going to learn to trade, then take a small retail account and consistently make money trading reasonably tight stops (as is the normal retail methodology) is pure fiction"

What these trading rooms teach is just that pure fiction and it is why they can show no proof of their claims of profitability.

You mention no one can learn trading from someone else, but the subject here is whether Al himself can trade his own method profitable. Or if he even trades live at all.

If Al cannot trade his own trading method profitable then I can guaranty you no one else is going to mysterious figure out how to. And that is the point as far as I am concerned. And the 2nd point is he should not be given a venue to push his non sense teachings unless he can show actual proof of his claims where is makes multi profitable ES scalps on a 5 minute chart and seldom a losing day. I love to see where you are doing that on your institutional account.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #186 (permalink)
Bloomington, IL
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Ninja
Trading: YM. ES
 
Posts: 11 since Jan 2011
Thanks: 3 given, 12 received

Well, rwbill, since I stated that trading tight stops and a small account results in a high level of losses. I believe it is safe to assume that if Mr. Brooks trades in either of those two misguided methodologies his results might well be delusional. Best of luck in your trading.

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #187 (permalink)
Baltimore MD
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB, Kinetics
Trading: E6, ES and CL
 
rwbil's Avatar
 
Posts: 93 since Nov 2012


trader7757 View Post
Well, rwbill, since I stated that trading tight stops and a small account results in a high level of losses. I believe it is safe to assume that if Mr. Brooks trades in either of those two misguided methodologies his results might well be delusional. Best of luck in your trading.

Not wanting to pick fights with people I agree with. Too few of them in this industry. I am with you. But not delusional. Purposely brilliant to scam people. Anything that will separate a sucker from his money is what they will tell you.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #188 (permalink)
New York, New Jersey/USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Trading: Futures
 
Seahn's Avatar
 
Posts: 161 since Jan 2013
Thanks: 63 given, 267 received


rwbil View Post
I agree with a lot of what you said, especially,

"average new trader is going to learn to trade, then take a small retail account and consistently make money trading reasonably tight stops (as is the normal retail methodology) is pure fiction"

What these trading rooms teach is just that pure fiction and it is why they can show no proof of their claims of profitability.

Actually Brooks does not advocate trading tight stops and small accounts. He specifically calls using tight stops "death by a thousand cuts" in his books and videos (and probably in his room). What he does recommend consistently is that the stop must be placed beyond the previous swing extreme, if that is too far away for proper risk management then he recommends trading smaller size or passing on the trading

Maybe if you put the same effort in at least trying to learn price action from what Brooks says as you do in trying to extract "proof" you would be further along in your trading.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #189 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Calgary, Alberta
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader 8
Broker: Kinetick
Trading: ES
 
JonnyBoy's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,329 since Apr 2012
Thanks: 519 given, 2,894 received


Seahn View Post
Maybe if you put the same effort in at least trying to learn price action from what Brooks says as you do in trying to extract "proof" you would be further along in your trading.

Now now. You have no idea about @rwbil and his/her trading.

You have made your point more then once. If there are traders that are asking for verification from an educator actively promoted by FIO then sobeit. @Big Mike has stated Al will be asked and I am sure this will set a precedence moving forward depending on his answer. Transparency and honesty can only be a positive thing for FIO. I truly don't know what will happen if Al point blank refuses to verify anything.

This obviously doesn't align with your views, sure, that is your opinion. But don't bring assumptions about another traders effort or make suggestions otherwise.

We can agree to disagree, but at the end of the day we are all in this together and if some folk require that additional layer of transparency, don't knock them for that.

--------------------------------------------------------
- Trade what you see. Invest in what you believe -
--------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to JonnyBoy for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #190 (permalink)
Site Moderator
Portland, Oregon
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: F-16CM-50
Trading: GBU-39
 
tturner86's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,150 since Sep 2013
Thanks: 10,428 given, 12,488 received



JonnyBoy View Post
But don't bring assumptions about another traders effort or make suggestions otherwise.

Why doesn't Al get the same respect? Everyone is making assumptions about him based on the comments from Emmett?

Why don't we stop this whole debate until after the webinar? Then from Al's own comments one can decide for themselves.

Reply With Quote
The following 4 users say Thank You to tturner86 for this post:


futures io Trading Community Trading Reviews and Vendors > Al Brooks Trading Course (www.brookstradingcourse.com)


September 2, 2017


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

Free BloodHound Licenses for everyone!

June
 

Every journal equals ten meals for the hungry

June
     



Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts