Al Brooks Trading Course (www.brookstradingcourse.com) - futures io
futures io



Al Brooks Trading Course (www.brookstradingcourse.com)


Discussion in Trading Reviews and Vendors

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Big Mike with 27 posts (137 thanks)
    2. looks_two bobwest with 27 posts (128 thanks)
    3. looks_3 emini2000 with 25 posts (34 thanks)
    4. looks_4 IzhakHaim with 23 posts (12 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Big Mike with 5.1 thanks per post
    2. looks_two bobwest with 4.7 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 SoftSoap with 3.8 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 JonnyBoy with 3.4 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 185,672 views
    2. thumb_up 1,077 thanks given
    3. group 116 followers
    1. forum 459 posts
    2. attach_file 5 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 150,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Al Brooks Trading Course (www.brookstradingcourse.com)

(login for full post details)
  #161 (permalink)
 trendwaves 
Market Wizard
Florida
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader 8
Trading: ES, NQ, CL
 
trendwaves's Avatar
 
Posts: 703 since Dec 2012
Thanks: 2,898 given, 2,523 received


Stray Dog View Post
What do you mean "Doesn't have the facts." Emmett did everything humanly possible to get "the facts" from Brooks but he wouldn't provide proof that he trades what he sells. He didn't provide that proof because he was unable to. Brooks doesn't trade the method that he sells.

Al Brooks not providing the proof you request is not evidence or proof of any wrongdoing on his part. He is not required to provide that information to the public. His choice to not provide that information to the public does not prove anything directly, but it can lead some people to form opinions one way or the other. Just keep in mind those opinions or conclusions drawn are being done so based on a lack of information. He may or may not trade live, we simply do not have enough objective information to know that answer with absolute certainty. Some folks may give him the benefit of the doubt, whereas others like yourself are not willing to.

Be Patient and Trade Smart
Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 5 users say Thank You to trendwaves for this post:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Daily systems newbie problems
MultiCharts
TradeStation Order Execution Networks stop server
TradeStation
NT8 Strategy Analyzer Problems
NinjaTrader
Day trading Treasury bonds
Treasury Notes and Bonds
Free ATR that displays in Ticks ?? NT8
NinjaTrader
 
 
(login for full post details)
  #162 (permalink)
 Big Mike 
Site Administrator
Swing Trader
Data Scientist & DevOps
Manta, Ecuador
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Trading: Futures & Crypto
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Posts: 50,182 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 32,681 given, 99,634 received

Al Brooks will be asked directly to clarify these items in the next webinar. His answers will decide what happens next.

I'm on my honeymoon with limited internet, please don't make me babysit this thread

Back in 10 days or so

Sent using the futures.io mobile app

We're here to help -- just ask

For the best trading education, watch our webinars
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list

Follow us on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook

Support our community as an Elite Member:
https://futures.io/elite/

Visit other sites? Please spread the word about your experience with our community!
Follow me on Twitter Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 11 users say Thank You to Big Mike for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #163 (permalink)
 SoftSoap 
Canada
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: InteractiveBrokers
Trading: NQ
 
SoftSoap's Avatar
 
Posts: 594 since Aug 2015
Thanks: 347 given, 1,225 received



Big Mike View Post
Al Brooks will be asked directly to clarify these items in the next webinar. His answers will decide what happens next.

I'm on my honeymoon with limited internet, please don't make me babysit this thread

Back in 10 days or so

Sent using the futures.io mobile app

Great way to address this. Hearing the community's concerns, not taking any sides, and asking Al to clarify these issues directly at the next webinar.

This is why @Big Mike is the man running the show!

Yesterday's excellence is today's standard and tomorrow's mediocrity
Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 5 users say Thank You to SoftSoap for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #164 (permalink)
emini2000
Atlanta GA USA
 
 
Posts: 281 since Aug 2013
Thanks: 70 given, 269 received

Well, one can easily answer the questions dishonestly if they aren't required any proof. All vendors will claim to make money until you ask them for proof. So just asking really doesn't reveal anything.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #165 (permalink)
 Stray Dog 
Beijing China
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation Sierra Chart
Trading: Emini ES
 
Stray Dog's Avatar
 
Posts: 20 since Oct 2016
Thanks: 15 given, 16 received


SoftSoap View Post
I think you answered your own question

What I meant by he doesn't have the facts, is that he is not in possession of the facts. I'm not stating whether he is right or wrong, because frankly I don't have the facts either.

Yes he tried to get them, but was unsuccessful. He can't confirm that Al is a trader or that he isn't. The best he can do is assume, and his post makes it clear that it's an assumption on what he believes. Everyone is entitled to their own assumption, but let's recognize that an assumption is just that, an assumption.




That's a very big jump in logic to be honest.

Just because someone doesn't provide proof, doesn't mean they are guilty. I'm sure there's a name for that under one of the 100s of logical fallacies

There could be many reasons as to why he won't show proof. Being a fraud is one, prioritization of his personal matters over perceived credibility is another. And frankly it could be anything in between.

To be clear I'm on the side that says Al should provide proof as to whether or not he trades or just call himself a pundit. But I'm not one to let emotions trump logic because this is FIO and not reddit.

One thing is to have a reasonable argument between members based on logic, and another one is grabbing pitchforks and letting our emotions justify the hops in logic.

Let's keep FIO what it is, a great community.

Cheers.

It doesn't take much logic to understand that if Al Brooks had proof of his trading he's have produced it to avoid a negative review and certainly he'd produce it now after the amount of interest that this thread has generated, but he hasn't. You can do all the mental flip and flops you like to think of reasons why he hasn't produced evidence of his trading but that is a pretty illogical thing to do when the logical conclusion is staring you straight in the face.

You stated that although he didn't have all the facts Emmett tarnished Al Brook's reputation. What was Emmett supposed to do? Give Al Brooks a free pass because he refused to provide proof of his claims? Brooks was given every opportunity to support those claims but he refused. Emmett reported all of that in his review. You may not like what was written but it reflects the truth and if Brook's reputation has been tarnished it's because he has made claims that he refuses to prove.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #166 (permalink)
 Stray Dog 
Beijing China
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation Sierra Chart
Trading: Emini ES
 
Stray Dog's Avatar
 
Posts: 20 since Oct 2016
Thanks: 15 given, 16 received


trendwaves View Post
Al Brooks not providing the proof you request is not evidence or proof of any wrongdoing on his part. He is not required to provide that information to the public. His choice to not provide that information to the public does not prove anything directly, but it can lead some people to form opinions one way or the other. Just keep in mind those opinions or conclusions drawn are being done so based on a lack of information. He may or may not trade live, we simply do not have enough objective information to know that answer with absolute certainty. Some folks may give him the benefit of the doubt, whereas others like yourself are not willing to.

He's a vendor making claims about the product he is selling and making claims about his own trading using that method. You are correct, he has no legal requirement to provide proof but refusing to provide it should be ringing common sense alarm bells and if he's given this venue (this safe space) to sell that product he should be providing proof or as I stated before he should be making it very clear that he is simply teaching what price action is. Providing proof may not be a standard that the law requires but I believe that it is a standard that this community should require.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to Stray Dog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #167 (permalink)
 sam028 
Site Moderator
 
 
sam028's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,710 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 3,806 given, 4,564 received

Some older BMT/FIO members may remind that the idea of creating a trading room/web site was not Al's idea but some of his book reader's. As far as I remember Al Brooks was not very open to the idea. It would be interesting to find the guy(s) who pushed the idea, at least one of them was member on the forum.
There are a bunch of more obvious targets than him anyway.

Success requires no deodorant! (Sun Tzu)
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #168 (permalink)
 tturner86 
Portland, Oregon
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: F-16CM-40
Trading: GBU-39
 
tturner86's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,184 since Sep 2013
Thanks: 10,459 given, 12,665 received


Stray Dog View Post
He's a vendor making claims about the product he is selling and making claims about his own trading using that method. You are correct, he has no legal requirement to provide proof but refusing to provide it should be ringing common sense alarm bells and if he's given this venue (this safe space) to sell that product he should be providing proof or as I stated before he should be making it very clear that he is simply teaching what price action is. Providing proof may not be a standard that the law requires but I believe that it is a standard that this community should require.

Can you name any vendor providing proof?

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #169 (permalink)
emini2000
Atlanta GA USA
 
 
Posts: 281 since Aug 2013
Thanks: 70 given, 269 received


Stray Dog View Post
It doesn't take much logic to understand that if Al Brooks had proof of his trading he's have produced it to avoid a negative review and certainly he'd produce it now after the amount of interest that this thread has generated, but he hasn't. You can do all the mental flip and flops you like to think of reasons why he hasn't produced evidence of his trading but that is a pretty illogical thing to do when the logical conclusion is staring you straight in the face.

You stated that although he didn't have all the facts Emmett tarnished Al Brook's reputation. What was Emmett supposed to do? Give Al Brooks a free pass because he refused to provide proof of his claims? Brooks was given every opportunity to support those claims but he refused. Emmett reported all of that in his review. You may not like what was written but it reflects the truth and if Brook's reputation has been tarnished it's because he has made claims that he refuses to prove.


Stray Dog View Post
He's a vendor making claims about the product he is selling and making claims about his own trading using that method. You are correct, he has no legal requirement to provide proof but refusing to provide it should be ringing common sense alarm bells and if he's given this venue (this safe space) to sell that product he should be providing proof or as I stated before he should be making it very clear that he is simply teaching what price action is. Providing proof may not be a standard that the law requires but I believe that it is a standard that this community should require.


Wholeheartedly agree.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to emini2000 for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #170 (permalink)
 Stray Dog 
Beijing China
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation Sierra Chart
Trading: Emini ES
 
Stray Dog's Avatar
 
Posts: 20 since Oct 2016
Thanks: 15 given, 16 received



tturner86 View Post
Can you name any vendor providing proof?

The only two that I know of are https://www.b12trader.com/ and http://www.watchhimtrade.com/index.php However, the absence of other vendors providing proof doesn't mean that we shouldn't require Books and all vendors to provide proof. If we're going to set that as our standard then I guess "I was only following orders" and "everybody does it is" have to be accepted are legitimate excuses too.

Reply With Quote


futures io Trading Community Trading Reviews and Vendors > Al Brooks Trading Course (www.brookstradingcourse.com)


Last Updated on August 18, 2022


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!

Ongoing
     



Copyright © 2022 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada), info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts