Al Brooks Trading Course (www.brookstradingcourse.com) - futures io
futures io futures trading



Al Brooks Trading Course (www.brookstradingcourse.com)


Discussion in Trading Reviews and Vendors

Updated by emini2000
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Big Mike with 27 posts (136 thanks)
    2. looks_two emini2000 with 25 posts (32 thanks)
    3. looks_3 IzhakHaim with 23 posts (12 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Rory with 18 posts (30 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Big Mike with 5.0 thanks per post
    2. looks_two bobwest with 4.8 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 SoftSoap with 3.5 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 JonnyBoy with 3.4 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 115,375 views
    2. thumb_up 924 thanks given
    3. group 90 followers
    1. forum 410 replies
    2. attach_file 4 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Al Brooks Trading Course (www.brookstradingcourse.com)

(login for full post details)
  #151 (permalink)
Canada
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: InteractiveBrokers
Trading: NQ
 
SoftSoap's Avatar
 
Posts: 594 since Aug 2015
Thanks: 347 given, 1,220 received


dstrader View Post
@SoftSoap

I think I agree 100% with what you said with exception of the ‘f..’ word on your fourth bullet point (second item). The use of vulgarity always weakens someone’s point imho, and your points are too good for that.

You are right on this, I blame it on my choice of music yesterday
But I do apologize.

Cheers!

Yesterday's excellence is today's standard and tomorrow's mediocrity
Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Tradestation behind Firewall
TradeStation
Calendar Spread on Weekly Options
The Elite Circle
Cumulative Bid/Ask Chart resets after 2Billion
MultiCharts
Too many brokers?
Traders Hideout
FYI plot bug & workaround: changing color or width is delayed 1 bar
EasyLanguage Programming
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on futures io
Life sacrifice loneliness trading futures
65 thanks
Is anyone actually making money?
48 thanks
Are sharks watching on the other side?
38 thanks
What VPC configuration/specification do you use for TS?
32 thanks
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
25 thanks
 
(login for full post details)
  #152 (permalink)
Beijing China
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation Sierra Chart
Trading: Emini ES
 
Stray Dog's Avatar
 
Posts: 20 since Oct 2016
Thanks: 15 given, 15 received


Tymbeline View Post
I think there are several Al Brooks enthusiasts here (I count myself as one of them) who can't argue with that.

Indeed, I suspect that's part of the reason for some of the negative publicity: people want something that's "quick and easy to follow".

Whenever posting positively/supportively about Al Brooks and mentioning that I wouldn't be making a living at all, without having benefitted from his work, I've always mentioned that the books are hard to read and badly edited.





Clearly.





In this thread, some people have either tacitly assumed this to be so, or openly stated it, as you have yourself.

It isn't actually an objective statement at all: it's simply an interpretation, or a belief. It's opinion, not fact.

The silence from Al Brooks apparently tells some people that.

As Sam says, however, it doesn't really matter, since it apparently doesn't bother Al himself (or at least, he's decided - rightly, in my opinion - not to respond to it): the people who believe that presumably aren't potential Al Brooks customers anyway.

(Again, I'm not commenting on the trading room, having never seen it. I broadly agree with all the negative comments offered above, about "trading rooms" in general.)

Give me a break. Brooks claims to trade, he claims to trade what he teaches, he claims that he's a successful trader yet he can produce no proof. He's a dishonest, lying con artist. I have no problem if he markets his product as pure education. This is what price action is all about. Here's the theory and here are the patterns or ways to interpret a chart, no problem with that type of education product at all, but that's not what he's doing. He should be banned until he either produces proof of real trading or comes clean and says he doesn't trade.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #153 (permalink)
Beijing China
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation Sierra Chart
Trading: Emini ES
 
Stray Dog's Avatar
 
Posts: 20 since Oct 2016
Thanks: 15 given, 15 received



SoftSoap View Post
This is probably a pressure move from the website that does the reviews.

Don't have the facts? That's okay, just write something that puts the educator in the same category as the snake oil salesmen. The ball is now on the educator to prove them wrong, and if they don't bother then it taints their reputation.

Petty yes, but hey everyone has different ways of getting what they want.


What do you mean "Doesn't have the facts." Emmett did everything humanly possible to get "the facts" from Brooks but he wouldn't provide proof that he trades what he sells. He didn't provide that proof because he was unable to. Brooks doesn't trade the method that he sells.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #154 (permalink)
 
 
Posts: 2,743 since May 2014
Thanks: 5,444 given, 8,140 received

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Edit: I posted as BobWest posted. I agree, its just getting nowhere. We discussed above in another thread. Truly pro traders are rarely victims of deception by their very nature. Its not a fair world.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #155 (permalink)
Beijing China
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation Sierra Chart
Trading: Emini ES
 
Stray Dog's Avatar
 
Posts: 20 since Oct 2016
Thanks: 15 given, 15 received


bobwest View Post
Can we just have an end to all this now?

No one's opinion is going to be changed. No enthusiast of either (or any) side is going to budge. Nothing new is going to be said.



Let's just have an end, and agree that we don't agree, and move on.

Bob.

Isn't futuresIO a place where people don't get ripped off? Shouldn't there be some requirement that a vendor produce proof that what they are selling does what they claim it does? I think we can move on as long as out of all of this the bar for vendors being allowed to sell their product is lifted and they have to provide 3rd party verified proof that their product performs. All claims made by or implied by vendors need to be proven.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #156 (permalink)
New York, New Jersey/USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Trading: Futures
 
Seahn's Avatar
 
Posts: 161 since Jan 2013
Thanks: 63 given, 267 received

This thread is moving into the "Trolling" category.

Reply With Quote
The following 5 users say Thank You to Seahn for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #157 (permalink)
Birmingham UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: TST/Rithmic
Trading: YM/Gold
 
ratfink's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,652 since Dec 2012
Thanks: 17,422 given, 8,386 received


bobwest View Post
Let's just have an end, and agree that we don't agree, and move on.

I didn't realise I was disagreeing with anybody, so I don't need to agree to and I'm not sure why you gave my two observational lines such short shrift, especially compared to some sermons that get posted. Honestly, observing forum herding behaviour just lately has been fascinating. If more took some peaceful time to do so they might figure a few other things out, like why the wave principle exists at all.

Have a good weekend.

Travel Well
Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to ratfink for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #158 (permalink)
Site Moderator
Sarasota FL
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Sierra Chart
Trading: ES, YM
 
bobwest's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,749 since Jan 2013
Thanks: 44,786 given, 19,415 received


ratfink View Post
I didn't realise I was disagreeing with anybody, so I don't need to agree to and I'm not sure why you gave my two observational lines such short shrift, especially compared to some sermons that get posted. Honestly, observing forum herding behaviour just lately has been fascinating. If more took some peaceful time to do so they might figure a few other things out, like why the wave principle exists at all.

Have a good weekend.

My mistake in what I was trying to utilize your words to convey. I wanted to say that I agreed with your point that all the analysis isn't going to change anyone's ideas.

I didn't mean to say anything about agreeing or not with you in terms of the controversy under way. I meant that it was time for the disputants, myself included, to move on, since nothing more was going to be said, and no one was going to be convinced.

Not that there was anything for you to agree to, or that I disagreed. That thought was not aimed at you.

I should have just bowed out a while ago, instead of adding to the heat here. I'll delete that post, since my meaning was unclear, and not add anything more to all this.

Sorry I didn't just do that sooner.

Your point about forum herd behavior is well-made, I'm afraid.

Bob.

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to bobwest for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #159 (permalink)
Canada
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: InteractiveBrokers
Trading: NQ
 
SoftSoap's Avatar
 
Posts: 594 since Aug 2015
Thanks: 347 given, 1,220 received


Stray Dog View Post
What do you mean "Doesn't have the facts." Emmett did everything humanly possible to get "the facts" from Brooks but he wouldn't provide proof that he trades what he sells.

I think you answered your own question

What I meant by he doesn't have the facts, is that he is not in possession of the facts. I'm not stating whether he is right or wrong, because frankly I don't have the facts either.

Yes he tried to get them, but was unsuccessful. He can't confirm that Al is a trader or that he isn't. The best he can do is assume, and his post makes it clear that it's an assumption on what he believes. Everyone is entitled to their own assumption, but let's recognize that an assumption is just that, an assumption.



Stray Dog View Post
He didn't provide that proof because he was unable to. Brooks doesn't trade the method that he sells.

That's a very big jump in logic to be honest.

Just because someone doesn't provide proof, doesn't mean they are guilty. I'm sure there's a name for that under one of the 100s of logical fallacies

There could be many reasons as to why he won't show proof. Being a fraud is one, prioritization of his personal matters over perceived credibility is another. And frankly it could be anything in between.

To be clear I'm on the side that says Al should provide proof as to whether or not he trades or just call himself a pundit. But I'm not one to let emotions trump logic because this is FIO and not reddit.

One thing is to have a reasonable argument between members based on logic, and another one is grabbing pitchforks and letting our emotions justify the hops in logic.

Let's keep FIO what it is, a great community.

Cheers.

Yesterday's excellence is today's standard and tomorrow's mediocrity
Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 6 users say Thank You to SoftSoap for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #160 (permalink)
Canada
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: InteractiveBrokers
Trading: NQ
 
SoftSoap's Avatar
 
Posts: 594 since Aug 2015
Thanks: 347 given, 1,220 received



ratfink View Post
I didn't realise I was disagreeing with anybody, so I don't need to agree to and I'm not sure why you gave my two observational lines such short shrift, especially compared to some sermons that get posted. Honestly, observing forum herding behaviour just lately has been fascinating. If more took some peaceful time to do so they might figure a few other things out, like why the wave principle exists at all.

Have a good weekend.

Just a thought I had reading this, but I wonder if the forums become more hostile as the market becomes more volatile?

Yesterday's excellence is today's standard and tomorrow's mediocrity
Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to SoftSoap for this post:


futures io Trading Community Trading Reviews and Vendors > Al Brooks Trading Course (www.brookstradingcourse.com)


September 2, 2017


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

Relative Rotation Graphs w/Julius de Kempenaer

Elite only
 

Every journal equals ten meals for the hungry

Now
     



Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts