Vendor Ratings Agency - futures io
futures io futures trading



Vendor Ratings Agency


Discussion in Trading Reviews and Vendors

Updated by Cloudy
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one traderwerks with 3 posts (0 thanks)
    2. looks_two Linds with 3 posts (0 thanks)
    3. looks_3 kk240 with 2 posts (1 thanks)
    4. looks_4 bluemele with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    1. trending_up 3,993 views
    2. thumb_up 1 thanks given
    3. group 5 followers
    1. forum 12 replies
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Vendor Ratings Agency

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
Victoria, Australia
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT, MT4
Broker: NT
Trading: Dax
 
Linds's Avatar
 
Posts: 398 since Jul 2010
Thanks: 813 given, 484 received

Since there is a LOT of concern about the quality, ethics and value of trading vendors...and since it is such an unregulated field....why not create a ratings process/entity for vendors. This could be very useful not only for prospective clients but for the vendors themselves if they wish to be be demonstrably seen as offering value and credibility.

Such a body would need to be carefully planned so that itself could not be subject to claims of bias and poor ethics.

So a set of objective, evidence based criteria and standards would need to be chosen to direct the processes and focus of the entity. Any assessment would have to be based on:

actual longitudinal experience of the products being assessed ( by experienced traders)
assessment of the vendors trading background
assessment of the quality and reasonableness of the marketing content

The output of such a process could be a detailed report of the key areas of focus and ultimately a rating such as A, B, C or RUN AWAY NOW.

Done well such an entity may even find a market for itself and would start the conversation about professional standards in the trading vendor universe

It would require significant resourcing to do this well.

I wonder what others think about this?

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Experience Baxter FX
The Elite Circle
Delta PVP ( POC )
MultiCharts
How to read csv file
Platforms and Indicators
Convert H Data TS to NT
NinjaTrader
Hedging strategy with free money
Traders Hideout
 
 
(login for full post details)
  #3 (permalink)
Washington DC
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
 
Posts: 214 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 110 given, 117 received



Linds View Post
Since there is a LOT of concern about the quality, ethics and value of trading vendors...and since it is such an unregulated field....why not create a ratings process/entity for vendors. This could be very useful not only for prospective clients but for the vendors themselves if they wish to be be demonstrably seen as offering value and credibility.

Such a body would need to be carefully planned so that itself could not be subject to claims of bias and poor ethics.

So a set of objective, evidence based criteria and standards would need to be chosen to direct the processes and focus of the entity. Any assessment would have to be based on:

actual longitudinal experience of the products being assessed ( by experienced traders)
assessment of the vendors trading background
assessment of the quality and reasonableness of the marketing content

The output of such a process could be a detailed report of the key areas of focus and ultimately a rating such as A, B, C or RUN AWAY NOW.

Done well such an entity may even find a market for itself and would start the conversation about professional standards in the trading vendor universe

It would require significant resourcing to do this well.

I wonder what others think about this?

Pray no. If this was an agency, it would be likely a government agency. worse the the worst of the vendors, and at what a cost.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #4 (permalink)
Honolulu, Hawaii
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: ATC/TT, AMP/Zen-Fire, AMP/CQG
Trading: TF
 
bluemele's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,547 since Jun 2010
Thanks: 3,803 given, 2,835 received

Gosh, well, a self-policing group isn't a bad idea, but considering 99.768111222888% of them are criminals (not actual felons, but liars, cheats, misleading snakes) then it is kind of like asking the Mafia (or U.S. Congress) to police themselves...

I believe that the NFA should crack down on them. In my opinion it is within their rules and regulations but they do not.

Sorry that I have nothing positive to say...

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #5 (permalink)
Taipei Taiwan
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP Clearing
Trading: TW
 
Posts: 693 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 434 given, 464 received

I don't think it is possible.

The people you would want to rate vendors would be successful traders. Successful traders don't care about vendors that much and they would not want to spend time looking at failed systems. You would probably end up with vendors pretending to be successful traders and promoting their own products.

Now ratings agency of un successful traders rating vendors is certainly possible, but of what worth ?

Math. A gateway drug to reality.
Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #6 (permalink)
Urban Samurai
Chicago IL
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja, MT4, Matlab
Broker: CQG, AMP, MB, DTN
Trading: E/U, G/U
 
forrestang's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,057 since Jun 2010
Thanks: 237 given, 706 received

I've thought about this before.

My thought of it would just be reviews by people who have actually paid for and used the product, and are no longer using it. Using people with several years of trading experience, profitable or not. I think the longer we are at it, the more useful the review is likely to be.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #7 (permalink)
Taipei Taiwan
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP Clearing
Trading: TW
 
Posts: 693 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 434 given, 464 received

Interesting thought.....

Math. A gateway drug to reality.
Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #8 (permalink)
Victoria, Australia
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT, MT4
Broker: NT
Trading: Dax
 
Linds's Avatar
 
Posts: 398 since Jul 2010
Thanks: 813 given, 484 received


bluemele View Post
Gosh, well, a self-policing group isn't a bad idea, but considering 99.768111222888% of them are criminals (not actual felons, but liars, cheats, misleading snakes) then it is kind of like asking the Mafia (or U.S. Congress) to police themselves...

I believe that the NFA should crack down on them. In my opinion it is within their rules and regulations but they do not.

Sorry that I have nothing positive to say...

Haha self policing! Of course thats out of the question due to total lack of credibility. NFA - well I'm thiking an independent and international entity. Its not just the USA we are talking about. Maybe it could start as a voluntary/informal kind of thing and build from there.


traderwerks View Post
I don't think it is possible.

The people you would want to rate vendors would be successful traders. Successful traders don't care about vendors that much and they would not want to spend time looking at failed systems. You would probably end up with vendors pretending to be successful traders and promoting their own products.

Now ratings agency of un successful traders rating vendors is certainly possible, but of what worth ?

Good points- but there would be successful traders out there that care about this stuff wouldnt there? And if enough got together then any individual wouldn't have to dedicate much time. There is also a bunch of BE+ traders who know a hell of a lot about what a scam looks like even if they cant make a living trading yet ( I am one).


forrestang View Post
I've thought about this before.

My thought of it would just be reviews by people who have actually paid for and used the product, and are no longer using it. Using people with several years of trading experience, profitable or not. I think the longer we are at it, the more useful the review is likely to be.

agree - but there needs to be a structure about what is reported. Personal testimony is too subjective.

Im thinking there is a good analogy between this and the 'secret shopper' or the restaurant critic. The process ( at least the product assessment part) needs to happen without the awareness of the vendor.

There would need to be some kind of member screening as as Traderwerks said it would be likley that vendors would attempt to infiltrate to corrupt the process in their favour.

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #9 (permalink)
Taipei Taiwan
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP Clearing
Trading: TW
 
Posts: 693 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 434 given, 464 received


Linds View Post

Good points- but there would be successful traders out there that care about this stuff wouldnt there? And if enough got together then any individual wouldn't have to dedicate much time. There is also a bunch of BE+ traders who know a hell of a lot about what a scam looks like even if they cant make a living trading yet ( I am one).

Very good point. I think a bunch of BE+ trader doing ratings for other ( BE+ / BE- ) traders would be of value. IMHO, the two ends of the spectrum would not want to use a service like this. Successful guys would not have the time/inclination ( enough of them anyway ) to keep up with ever morphing vendors. The other end of the spectrum has not gone through to have given up on looking for the holy grail to really believe such an agency.

I think most BE+/- traders are already set on their trading style and are looking at systems for more trading ideas to refine and improve their trading style.

Math. A gateway drug to reality.
Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #10 (permalink)
Europe,Nomad
 
 
Posts: 85 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 25 given, 30 received


Here is one "rating agency"
Free Forex Trading Community With Forex Signals And Broker Reviews

Reply With Quote


futures io Trading Community Trading Reviews and Vendors > Vendor Ratings Agency


December 29, 2011


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

Trading and Hedging Gold Futures & Options w/Carley Garner

Elite only
 

New Bookmap Indicators and Trading Services

Dec 3
 

Battlestations!

January
     



Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts