Lance Begg vs Al Brooks - futures io
futures io futures trading



Lance Begg vs Al Brooks


Discussion in Trading Reviews and Vendors

Updated by lsubeano
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Lornz with 6 posts (0 thanks)
    2. looks_two forrestang with 5 posts (0 thanks)
    3. looks_3 monpere with 4 posts (7 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Zwaen with 4 posts (11 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one trader1512 with 8.0 thanks per post
    2. looks_two lsubeano with 4.0 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Zwaen with 2.8 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 monpere with 1.8 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 37,668 views
    2. thumb_up 39 thanks given
    3. group 18 followers
    1. forum 33 replies
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Lance Begg vs Al Brooks

(login for full post details)
  #21 (permalink)
Oslo, Norway
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: CQG, Excel
Trading: CL
 
Lornz's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,198 since Apr 2010


forrestang View Post
Hehe..... ya I figured that was understood.

But then again, it's not about the system, it's about the person able to deploy it.

Well, you could be one of those "if you put your mind to it, you can accomplish anything" types... You never know on the internet...

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Exporting rollover dates from NT
NinjaTrader
Thanksgiving 2020 Fundraiser - lets be grateful!
Feedback and Announcements
Display Total Delta in Numeric form
MultiCharts
Historical option expirations
Brokers
Convert H Data TS to NT
NinjaTrader
 
 
(login for full post details)
  #22 (permalink)
Bala, PA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus, IB
Trading: SPY, Oil, Euro
 
monpere's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,858 since Jul 2010
Thanks: 300 given, 3,336 received


Lornz View Post
I tend to agree. But only the successful ones. A large number of people will never make it as traders, that is the sad truth.

I hold the belief that successful discretionary trading ultimately can be attributed to genetics/biology.

I fully agree with that belief. I have referred to it as an 'inherent ability to read the markets' in some of my other posts on the subject. Problem is, all the successful traders who have that ability write posts that say it's easy, just do this, just trust your instincts, trust your gut, just feel the market, you can develop that skill etc. Newbies, see posts like that and think, cool I can do that, but quickly find out if they have that ability or not. Skill is not developed through repetition alone, it requries aptitude or genetic ability first. If I am clumsy and uncoordinated by nature, I will probably never become a professional ball room dancer, or professional basketball player. I think if you don't have that ability, you can spend 10,000 hours at the screen, you will never succeed at discretionary trading.

I know I don't have that aptitude as indicated by my failure as a discretionary trader. But once I switched my focus to strict ruled based mechanical trading, I instantly jumped the hurdle. Even now after being a full time rule based mechanical trader for 5 years, If I try to speculate, and predict the market, I still fail miserably. I think humans have the psychological need to feel responsible for their own fates, so we naturally have a bias to be discretionary, as that style of trading fulfills that need. I think anyone failing as a discretionary trader, should put aside the natural psychological bias towards discretionary, and look into the rule based mechanical approach (welcome to the dark side )

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to monpere for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #23 (permalink)
Chicago IL
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja, MT4, Matlab
Broker: CQG, AMP, MB, DTN
Trading: E/U, G/U
 
forrestang's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,053 since Jun 2010
Thanks: 233 given, 705 received


I would agree that there will always be a % of the population that may never make it at trading even if they had all the time in the world. That probably holds true for just about ANY activity though.

But actually, there are probably dozens of variables or reasons a trader won't make it, beyond just them not having the aptitude to do it. So some people might eventually chalk up their inability to read a chart to lacking the aptitude for it, but that person could also just have not been in the environment to foster that ability. So what is the real reason? Could be dozens of things?!?

I would think that MOST people could become discretionary traders given the proper motivation and enough time to figure it out. But I also believe that if an infinite number of monkeys were typing on keyboards for an infinite amount of time, they would eventually type a Shakespeare novel.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #24 (permalink)
Bala, PA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus, IB
Trading: SPY, Oil, Euro
 
monpere's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,858 since Jul 2010
Thanks: 300 given, 3,336 received


forrestang View Post
I would agree that there will always be a % of the population that may never make it at trading even if they had all the time in the world. That probably holds true for just about ANY activity though.

But actually, there are probably dozens of variables or reasons a trader won't make it, beyond just them not having the aptitude to do it. So some people might eventually chalk up their inability to read a chart to lacking the aptitude for it, but that person could also just have not been in the environment to foster that ability. So what is the real reason? Could be dozens of things?!?

I would think that MOST people could become discretionary traders given the proper motivation and enough time to figure it out. But I also believe that if an infinite number of monkeys were typing on keyboards for an infinite amount of time, they would eventually type a Shakespeare novel.

Yeah! Most discretionary traders would think they would be able to pick the Shakespearean monkey, and just as in the numbers in real life, 95% of them will be wrong. Me, as a statistical mechanical trader, I would say, I don't like those odds

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #25 (permalink)
Chicago IL
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja, MT4, Matlab
Broker: CQG, AMP, MB, DTN
Trading: E/U, G/U
 
forrestang's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,053 since Jun 2010
Thanks: 233 given, 705 received


monpere View Post
Yeah! what are the odds you will be that monkey? Most discretionary traders would think they would be that monkey. Me, as a statistical mechanical trader, I would say, I don't like those odds

Well, the odds of that event occurring for the monkey are INFINITESIMALLY small. We're talking gagillionths of a percent here.

You have the aptitude to be a discretionary trader, I'm certain of it. You simply found another way before you figured it out, and you have likely resigned to the fact that it's an impossibility for you.

Lawl, if I figured out my mechanical system, I'd probably give up the idea of discretionary trading all together, and I'd be like the guy that wrote "market wizards," and say I can't trade discretionary either. (He said he couldn't trade discretionary and that systems trading was the only thing that allowed him to trade successfully).

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #26 (permalink)
Bala, PA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus, IB
Trading: SPY, Oil, Euro
 
monpere's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,858 since Jul 2010
Thanks: 300 given, 3,336 received


forrestang View Post
Well, the odds of that event occurring for the monkey are INFINITESIMALLY small. We're talking gagillionths of a percent here.

You have the aptitude to be a discretionary trader, I'm certain of it. You simply found another way before you figured it out, and you have likely resigned to the fact that it's an impossibility for you.

Lawl, if I figured out my mechanical system, I'd probably give up the idea of discretionary trading all together, and I'd be like the guy that wrote "market wizards," and say I can't trade discretionary either. (He said he couldn't trade discretionary and that systems trading was the only thing that allowed him to trade successfully).

You might be right. One of the issue behind the high trader failure rate is that, by default the great majority of traders are discretionary traders, and whether I am right or wrong about needing to have the aptitude, the discretionary trading learning process tends to take most traders to the 'point of ruin' way before they can develop that skill. So maybe the reality is, most may just blow up their accounts before they had the chance to fine tune their discretionary skill.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to monpere for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #27 (permalink)
anduras
 
 
Posts: 5 since Sep 2010
Thanks: 1 given, 0 received


monpere View Post
the reality is, most may just blow up their accounts before they had the chance to fine tune their discretionary skill.

Very perspicace observation. And of course, most will not spend the time required on a simulator to practice their discretionary trading skills. Trading on a simulator means no chance of making real money, and most traders start trading for the real money. Add to this documenting their discretionary trading in a rigourous way, and many newbies will give up.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #28 (permalink)
Netherlands, Blaricum
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Excel, Python, R
Broker: IB
Trading: Options
 
Zwaen's Avatar
 
Posts: 250 since Dec 2010
Thanks: 848 given, 237 received

Something about the "95%" fail figure.

I once read that this figure was based on the accounts closed within a specific time period, with a certain broker.
The problem with this is that within this population:

1) there a lot of people who don't take trading seriously and just play(gamble) with a very tiny account
2) there are also a lot of people who think they will be a millionaire in just 3 years
3) there are a lot of people who take a few trades and lose interest and close the account

So I think that when this investigation whas done among a popalution who was serious and dedicated to becoming a trader, the failure rate will be far less. Nevertheless, trading should be seen as a profession and is not easy.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #29 (permalink)
anduras
 
 
Posts: 5 since Sep 2010
Thanks: 1 given, 0 received

This statistics also hold for "professional" traders. Few years ago, some US prop firms went
bankrupt, and all their financials were thus put out by the court.
People were surprised to see again this magical 95% failure rate.
This was a prop where people were trading full-time seriously.
I hope I am not crushing your illusions. Interestingly every joe believes he will not
be one of the 95%.




Zwaen View Post
Something about the "95%" fail figure.

I once read that this figure was based on the accounts closed within a specific time period, with a certain broker.
The problem with this is that within this population:

1) there a lot of people who don't take trading seriously and just play(gamble) with a very tiny account
2) there are also a lot of people who think they will be a millionaire in just 3 years
3) there are a lot of people who take a few trades and lose interest and close the account

So I think that when this investigation whas done among a popalution who was serious and dedicated to becoming a trader, the failure rate will be far less. Nevertheless, trading should be seen as a profession and is not easy.


Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #30 (permalink)
Chicago, IL
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader, TOS
Broker: Mirus/ZF
Trading: Currencies, ES
 
zcui's Avatar
 
Posts: 22 since Jun 2011
Thanks: 17 given, 23 received


As a currency trader, like Lance Beggs, I found his method works better than Al Brook's on currency futures. However, since most of his charts in his book are from 2010, I'm a little concerned about its profitability in long term.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to zcui for this post:


futures io Trading Community Trading Reviews and Vendors > Lance Begg vs Al Brooks


January 9, 2014


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

Bookmap

Nov TBD
     



Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts