Lance Begg vs Al Brooks - futures io
futures io



Lance Begg vs Al Brooks


Discussion in Trading Reviews and Vendors

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Lornz with 6 posts (0 thanks)
    2. looks_two forrestang with 5 posts (0 thanks)
    3. looks_3 monpere with 4 posts (7 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Zwaen with 4 posts (11 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one trader1512 with 8 thanks per post
    2. looks_two lsubeano with 4 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Zwaen with 2.8 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 monpere with 1.8 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 42,143 views
    2. thumb_up 39 thanks given
    3. group 18 followers
    1. forum 33 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 150,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Lance Begg vs Al Brooks

(login for full post details)
  #11 (permalink)
 Zwaen 
Netherlands, Blaricum
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Excel, Python, R
Broker: IB
Trading: Options
 
Zwaen's Avatar
 
Posts: 250 since Dec 2010
Thanks: 848 given, 238 received

@ Mercury, are you trading the setups already?

I must say for lance the chapter where the traded examples are described minute by minute are very very good, because you can follow his thoughts while price is developing in his trade bar for bar. Haven't found anything as good( detailed ) as that. If anyone knows anything like that - from another source - please let me know, I'm interested in learning more.

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
NT8 Batch load strategies from xml
NinjaTrader
Historical Tick Data for E-mini Futures
The Elite Circle
Pinescript to EL conversion - ema cloud indicator
TradeStation
Moving Average Price Scan
ThinkOrSwim
Order Flow Volume Profile POC parameters in Ninjatrder
NinjaTrader
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on futures io
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
12 thanks
Cycle Analysis... a way of looking at price action.
8 thanks
Want your NinjaTrader indicator created, free?
7 thanks
Basic Education for Beginner Trader
7 thanks
How bad is NT lag?
4 thanks
 
(login for full post details)
  #12 (permalink)
 Lornz 
Oslo, Norway
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: CQG, Excel
Trading: CL
 
Lornz's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,198 since Apr 2010

That is a fair point. I am quite familiar with Mr. Brooks, though. But I will not suffer through his book, that is quite certain. As for Mr. Beggs, I took a look at his website and it did not inspire confidence.

I would much rather read some of the old classics, most of the new ones are just rehashing content anyway.

This is a good book for beginners:

Amazon.com: Technical Analysis and Stock Market Profits (9780273630951): Richard. Schabacker, Donald.(Ed Mack: Books

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #13 (permalink)
 forrestang 
Urban Samurai
Chicago IL
 
Experience: None
Platform: Ninja, MT4, Matlab
Broker: CQG, AMP, MB, DTN
Trading: E/U, G/U
 
forrestang's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,321 since Jun 2010
Thanks: 346 given, 1,033 received


I think all discretionary methods are equally useless.

I'm not saying that to say that one can't make money with something learned from someone else..... but I think in the end it's a matter of THAT method making sense to the person trying to deploy it.

I believe they are all just as good, and just as bad as the next one. I'm sure someone has managed to trade with principles from Wyckoff and failed, and then got ahold of Brooks' Method, which may have made more sense that THAT individual..... or vice versa.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #14 (permalink)
kamicrazy
New Zealand
 
 
Posts: 72 since Jun 2011
Thanks: 2 given, 32 received

I'm currently reading through lances' material. I find his writing style to be a bit difficult, I am mildly dyslexic and his prose causes me problems.

However the concepts he presents in it are well explained and in depth. Since it is discretionary trading, on a personal level I feel comfortable with his methods and it does make logical sense to me the way he reasons what he does.

He does not believe in indicators or mechanical systems and I get the message that he believes auto trading should be left to institutions with vast resources and expertise.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #15 (permalink)
 Mercury 
PU , India
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja Trader
Trading: Nifty Futures
 
Mercury's Avatar
 
Posts: 51 since Aug 2010
Thanks: 148 given, 35 received


Zwaen View Post
@ Mercury, are you trading the setups already?

I must say for lance the chapter where the traded examples are described minute by minute are very very good, because you can follow his thoughts while price is developing in his trade bar for bar. Haven't found anything as good( detailed ) as that. If anyone knows anything like that - from another source - please let me know, I'm interested in learning more.

Hi, Zwaen,
U r rt, Beggs writing style is simple.
about ur question on me trading his setups..Answer is NO.
I trade Market Profile, bt problem i was facing with it was Timing(Entry /exits) , so i apply his concepts of MTF analysis on MP, so its helping me for timing trades.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #16 (permalink)
 Lornz 
Oslo, Norway
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: CQG, Excel
Trading: CL
 
Lornz's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,198 since Apr 2010


forrestang View Post
I think all discretionary methods are equally useless.

I'm not saying that to say that one can't make money with something learned from someone else..... but I think in the end it's a matter of THAT method making sense to the person trying to deploy it.

I believe they are all just as good, and just as bad as the next one. I'm sure someone has managed to trade with principles from Wyckoff and failed, and then got ahold of Brooks' Method, which may have made more sense that THAT individual..... or vice versa.


Well, per definition a discretionary system can't really be learnt. The key ingredient will be mind of the person trading it. The most important thing for a discretionary trader would be risk and money management in order to remain solvent when wrong.

There are many ways of making money in the markets, and people should do what they feel is best for them.

But there are still a lot of valid concepts in the works of, e.g., Wyckoff. Things like S/R never go out of fashion, and can easily be incorporated in automated systems, as well....

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #17 (permalink)
 forrestang 
Urban Samurai
Chicago IL
 
Experience: None
Platform: Ninja, MT4, Matlab
Broker: CQG, AMP, MB, DTN
Trading: E/U, G/U
 
forrestang's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,321 since Jun 2010
Thanks: 346 given, 1,033 received


Lornz View Post
Well, per definition a discretionary system can't really be learnt. The key ingredient will be mind of the person trading it. The most important thing for a discretionary trader would be risk and money management in order to remain solvent when wrong.

There are many ways of making money in the markets, and people should do what they feel is best for them.

But there are still a lot of valid concepts in the works of, e.g., Wyckoff. Things like S/R never go out of fashion, and can easily be incorporated in automated systems, as well....

You said I think in a more concise manner of what I was saying in your first 2 paragraphs.

I think given enough time, a trader will eventually form whatever realizations necessary to make ANY discretionary system work. Could be as rudimentary as a ma cross I would imagine, but eventually, the trader would be mainly forming patterns in his head about how the price moves along with the ma.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #18 (permalink)
 monpere 
Bala, PA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus, IB
Trading: SPY, Oil, Euro
 
monpere's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,858 since Jul 2010
Thanks: 300 given, 3,355 received

I have not read any of Al Brooks' books, but I picked up an interesting morsel of info in his webinar on futures.io (formerly BMT). That is, he says he trades "don't care size", meaning he trades a number of contracts that is small enough not to affect him psychologically, win or loose on every trade. If his account will allow him to trade 10 contracts, he will trade 2. This way, you can trade your method without affecting it through fear and greed. I do the same thing, but never really thought about it much. I think most traders would benefit from this approach.

Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to monpere for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #19 (permalink)
 Lornz 
Oslo, Norway
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: CQG, Excel
Trading: CL
 
Lornz's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,198 since Apr 2010


forrestang View Post
You said I think in a more concise manner of what I was saying in your first 2 paragraphs.

I think given enough time, a trader will eventually form whatever realizations necessary to make ANY discretionary system work. Could be as rudimentary as a ma cross I would imagine, but eventually, the trader would be mainly forming patterns in his head about how the price moves along with the ma.


I tend to agree. But only the successful ones. A large number of people will never make it as traders, that is the sad truth.

I hold the belief that successful discretionary trading ultimately can be attributed to genetics/biology.

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #20 (permalink)
 forrestang 
Urban Samurai
Chicago IL
 
Experience: None
Platform: Ninja, MT4, Matlab
Broker: CQG, AMP, MB, DTN
Trading: E/U, G/U
 
forrestang's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,321 since Jun 2010
Thanks: 346 given, 1,033 received



Lornz View Post
I tend to agree. But only the successful ones.

Hehe..... ya I figured that was understood.

But then again, it's not about the system, it's about the person able to deploy it.

Reply With Quote


futures io Trading Community Trading Reviews and Vendors > Lance Begg vs Al Brooks


Last Updated on January 9, 2014


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!

Ongoing
     



Copyright © 2022 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada), info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts