NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Trade for a Living


Discussion in Trading Journals

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one jba1962 with 176 posts (354 thanks)
    2. looks_two kareem40 with 9 posts (14 thanks)
    3. looks_3 TradingThomas with 8 posts (10 thanks)
    4. looks_4 bobwest with 8 posts (20 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one bobwest with 2.5 thanks per post
    2. looks_two mtzimmer1 with 2.1 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 jba1962 with 2 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 kareem40 with 1.6 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 30,306 views
    2. thumb_up 461 thanks given
    3. group 28 followers
    1. forum 237 posts
    2. attach_file 1 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Trade for a Living

  #151 (permalink)
TradingThomas
Las Vegas Nevada USA
 
Posts: 18 since Sep 2018
Thanks Given: 12
Thanks Received: 21

If there is no way of replicating your Excel based selections in NinjaTrader, and if you have to enter the trades by paying the spread each time, have you given thought to temporarily modifying your NinjaTrader system in order to mitigate the slippage effects by :
  1. having 1 (or perhaps 2) legs only instead of 3, and/or
  2. sacrificing some precision and granularity afforded by the micros, and just trading e-mini's

All this, of course, subject to prior backtesting.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
About a successful futures trader who didn´t know anyth …
Psychology and Money Management
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
Cheap historycal L1 data for stocks
Stocks and ETFs
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
 
  #152 (permalink)
 jba1962 
TampaFL
 
Experience: Master
Platform: TWS
Trading: ES
Posts: 183 since Oct 2017
Thanks Given: 97
Thanks Received: 374

Funny that you mention that. I had just completed calculating the p/l of each leg when I saw your post. I did so by looking at Ninja's backtest instead of painstakingly going through each and every trade. I figured it was close enough. Isolated the results for the last 90 days per backtest:

Leg 1: 3831.50
Leg 2: 9001.00
Leg 3: 6350.50

So there may be some merit to cutting out leg 1, or perhaps Leg 1 and Leg 3. Maybe even doing just Leg2 and doubling up on it. I'd have top check the drawdown.

Not considering the minis for the Ninja trade just yet. I'd have to see a lot more before I'd feel comfortable putting it on auto pilot.

It's a process.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #153 (permalink)
 jba1962 
TampaFL
 
Experience: Master
Platform: TWS
Trading: ES
Posts: 183 since Oct 2017
Thanks Given: 97
Thanks Received: 374


Non Day-Trade P/L: -42.37 Month: -190.98 *Total: +3389.25
DayTrade P/L: +1479.70 Month: +9355.27 *Total: +46,060.47
Ninja P/L: Day: -538.40 Month: -538.40 Total: -538.40 Ninja Balance: 4050.02


* Total is since June 1, since I started this journal in June and June 3 is when I switched to using the micros in the daytrade portion. Ninja total is from September 13 when I started trying to automate the day-trade portion

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #154 (permalink)
 jba1962 
TampaFL
 
Experience: Master
Platform: TWS
Trading: ES
Posts: 183 since Oct 2017
Thanks Given: 97
Thanks Received: 374

Non Day Trade: Lost more in equities. Done with them. A failed experiment. I never mind trying new things, but I am not so stubborn as to keep throwing away money day after day. It gets tiring. Lost another couple hundred today. Won't do anything more with equities until/unless I devise an approach that fits my personality and actually has a chance to make money.

Day Trade; One of the most aggravating days ever. Over the weekend I calculated the profit per day (using Ninja's backtest, not by manually going through my trades). 51% of the entire profit was made on Mondays. So with that in mind I decided to do 3 units today. And it worked immediately; rode the Russell train to better than +4600 by noon. I thought about lightening up, but I am trying to automate my trading to a degree, including no manual intervention, so I let it run. And as the Russell fell apart, so did my trade. I never cut anything, made no adjustments and stayed right to the end and walked away +517. Yep, 4100 dollars just frittered away. I don't think I'm cut out to be an automated trader.

Ninja: Par for the course here too. Completely different trade 1, both the buy and the sell. The 2nd and 3rd legs were the same as mine, but because Leg 1 was so different, the third ended up being a negation (which my code seems to have handled OK, so that's the good news). This trade was never better than +500, and ended up down 305 on the day.

Exact numbers in the morning.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #155 (permalink)
 jba1962 
TampaFL
 
Experience: Master
Platform: TWS
Trading: ES
Posts: 183 since Oct 2017
Thanks Given: 97
Thanks Received: 374

An interesting thing happened yesterday. I thought my system had handled the negation correctly yesterday, but perhaps not. At 4:59:30 it got out of MYM, which of course since I was flat, really got me back in. Ninja immediately blew me out saying I wasn't margined, even though I had enough in the account to hold the positions. Not that I would have wanted to hold the position, but there should have been no need to force close. And they gave me a $50. fine. Nice, huh?

So I may be done with Ninja. It just doesn't seem reliable enough. Even if the error was in my code (and let's assume it was), it ignored my fail safe exit of 2760 seconds before the close (4:14 Eastern) and used the default 30 seconds for my Exit on Close setting. That gave me no time to react, and Ninja blew me out.

Which brings me to a question: What is the best way to automate a strategy with IB? I did several searches on this site yesterday and could not find anything. Which probably means I did a bad job searching because this question has to have been asked before. How can I write strategies for IB's TWS? I don't mind learning another language if necessary. I'm certainly not a C# whiz at this point anyway.

If this has been answered, could somebody kindly point me to the thread?

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #156 (permalink)
 jba1962 
TampaFL
 
Experience: Master
Platform: TWS
Trading: ES
Posts: 183 since Oct 2017
Thanks Given: 97
Thanks Received: 374

Non Day-Trade P/L: +325.42 Month: +134.34 *Total: +3714.57
DayTrade P/L: +517.02 Month: +9872.29 *Total: +46,577.49
Ninja P/L: Day: -334.06 Month: -538.40 Total: -872.46 Ninja Balance: 3715.96


* Total is since June 1, since I started this journal in June and June 3 is when I switched to using the micros in the daytrade portion. Ninja total is from September 13 when I started trying to automate the day-trade portion

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #157 (permalink)
 jba1962 
TampaFL
 
Experience: Master
Platform: TWS
Trading: ES
Posts: 183 since Oct 2017
Thanks Given: 97
Thanks Received: 374

After posting the results from the Ninja backtest I realized that it wouldn't take all that long to compile the results from my actual trading since I have only been doing the Micros (and this journal) since June 3. And it would make an interesting comparison.

First my model. This is using the exact rules, assumes no slippage (but does include commissions and fees) and is for 1 unit every day:

Monday: +11,335.32
Tuesday: +3236.91
Wednesday: +6147.11
Thursday: +1442.92
Friday: +2574.86

So a fairly similar distribution. But if you look at my actual results:

Monday: +9812.03
Tuesday: +11,684.93
Wednesday: +10,600.97
Thursday: +3497.34
Friday: +10,982.22

A lot of the discrepancy is due to me trading 2 units lately, and yesterday (and today though those results are not yet included) 3 units. The rest is due to my manual intervention. I have actually underperformed on Monday, been equally relatively ineffective on Thursday, but outperformed on Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. Sample size is small, but definitely something to watch.

My discipline scores lend another angle. My averages:

Monday: 83.53%
Tuesday: 84.47%
Wednesday: 69.47%
Thursday: 72.6%
Friday: 87.87%

So it looks like I have done a decent job on Tuesday of staying in control, making adjustments, adding and subtracting, with good results. I have had good results on Wednesday but haven't been under control as much as I should have been and probably should expect some losses if that continues. Thursday I haven't done a good job staying disciplined, and haven't had very good results. By Friday I am back in control going into the weekend. It seems I need to be more accepting of taking losses mid-week and not make as many adjustments. Something to keep an eye on. Trading (for me) is a lot about managing the trader.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #158 (permalink)
 jba1962 
TampaFL
 
Experience: Master
Platform: TWS
Trading: ES
Posts: 183 since Oct 2017
Thanks Given: 97
Thanks Received: 374

Non Day Trade: Nothing Done

Day Trade: Another great start to this trade. Was up just over 2K (did 3 units) before noon, and then bam! started dropping - much quicker than yesterday, and all the way down to almost break even. Deja vu all over again? Was it going to fritter away 4100 dollars like yesterday? Nope it recovered and stayed between 1200-1800 for several hours. Just when I thought I might exit if it got back to 2K it took off in my favor. It was doing so well that I let it run several minutes past my usual exit time and exited with a profit of about 3640. A very nice day.

Ninja: No extraneous trades! Yay! It actually did the same trade today as I did. All 3 legs. No negations today. It of course got out on time and exited with a profit of 811 before fees and commissions. There was about 74 dollars of slippage today.

Exact numbers in the morning.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #159 (permalink)
 jba1962 
TampaFL
 
Experience: Master
Platform: TWS
Trading: ES
Posts: 183 since Oct 2017
Thanks Given: 97
Thanks Received: 374

Non Day-Trade P/L: 0.00 Month: +134.34 *Total: +3714.57
DayTrade P/L: +3638.10 Month: +13,510.39 *Total: +50,215.59
Ninja P/L: Day: +774.10 Month: -98.36 Total: -98.36 Ninja Balance: 4490.06


* Total is since June 1, since I started this journal in June and June 3 is when I switched to using the micros in the daytrade portion. Ninja total is from September 13 when I started trying to automate the day-trade portion

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #160 (permalink)
 jba1962 
TampaFL
 
Experience: Master
Platform: TWS
Trading: ES
Posts: 183 since Oct 2017
Thanks Given: 97
Thanks Received: 374


Non Day Trade: Nothing Done

Day Trade Side: What a difference a timestamp makes. My first leg was long the Russell and obviously didn't work too well. When it came time to put on the 2nd leg, my IB price was 3 points(!) higher than the Ninja price for the same instant in time. In the couple months I've been playing with Ninja I've never seen a discrepancy of more than a tick or two. One point would have been very surprising to me. But 3? Wow! So, in IB I added to my long Russell while Ninja negated the first trade and went short Russell. I did get a great fill of course because in the time it took me to enter, the price had dropped quite a bit. Probably should have just skipped it. What's that old saying about not trusting positive slippage that you didn't earn? By the time the third leg came along I was down quite a bit. The third long did negate the Russells and went short. The trade finally started working nicely for me. My intent all along was to be out before 2 pm and the Fed announcement. So when the trade went positive for the first time all day, I quickly bailed. +150 for the day. Did 3 units.

Ninja: Ninja executed properly, but I did see the problem with negation arise again. I don't know why, but it "thinks" it has an extra short/long when it negates a previous leg. It really doesn't, so the trade seems correct, but then it tries to close out the phantom position at the end of the day, which leads to me getting back in inadvertently. And then Ninja blows me out and gives me a fine, even if I have enough to hold the position. So now that I know what it's doing, I am going to track down the why. If I can figure out why, I can probably fix the code. Fortunately I remembered to disable the strategy after I exited, so there will be no surprises. As for the trading, it did well. Negated trade 1 and shorted Russell with both trade 2 and trade 3. I manually exited just before the Fed announcement because I didn't want to be in after 2:00. Because I did the exits manually, slippage was only about 40 dollars today. Ninja was positive 841 before fees.

Exact numbers in the morning.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on October 10, 2019


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts