NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





rbars $150K TopStep Combine


Discussion in Trading Journals

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one tradethetick with 39 posts (58 thanks)
    2. looks_two Pedro40 with 9 posts (30 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Inletcap with 6 posts (31 thanks)
    4. looks_4 HoopyTrading with 6 posts (0 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Inletcap with 5.2 thanks per post
    2. looks_two Pedro40 with 3.3 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 bobwest with 2.2 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 tradethetick with 1.5 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 18,828 views
    2. thumb_up 163 thanks given
    3. group 21 followers
    1. forum 91 posts
    2. attach_file 4 attachments




 
Search this Thread

rbars $150K TopStep Combine

  #81 (permalink)
 
bobwest's Avatar
 bobwest 
Western Florida
Site Moderator
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra Chart
Trading: ES, YM
Frequency: Several times daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 8,162 since Jan 2013
Thanks Given: 57,343
Thanks Received: 26,267


Pedro40 View Post
I think you chose the wrong Combine. Beside there is not a real difference between the 100K and the 150K (so you could have saved 50 bucks right there) you should have done the 30K, for a couple of reasons:

1. For the price of a 150K Combine you can try 2.5 30K Combines.
2. You would use less number of contracts. Less temptation to try to score big.
3. The full position to max. DD ratio is much better at 30K, it is 10 times. Your combine had it at 6, so much less wiggle room if you keep trading a full position.
4. Same with the profit target to full position ratio, it is only 10 at 30K but 12 at 150K. Harder to reach it at 150K.

TL: DR; next time choose the 30K Combine, much cheaper and easier to do.

This is exactly the right kind of cost/benefit analysis for deciding which Combine to go into, in my opinion.

I would just add the 50K, because the higher daily loss and max drawdown numbers give you more breathing room, and it's just another $15 over the cost of the 30.

But @Pedro40's advice has been right on target during this Combine: keep that exposure (trade size) low enough so it doesn't bite you; don't try for the big win, just some steady ones; and choose the max DD and daily loss limits wisely when you go in. Or so it seems to me.

Bob.

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
New Micros: Ultra 10-Year & Ultra T-Bond -- Live Now
Treasury Notes and Bonds
My NT8 Volume Profile Split by Asian/Euro/Open
NinjaTrader
The space time continuum and the dynamics of a financial …
Emini and Emicro Index
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
Are there any eval firms that allow you to sink to your …
Traders Hideout
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
60 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
37 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
24 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
22 thanks
The Program
19 thanks
  #82 (permalink)
Pedro40
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
 
Posts: 564 since Jan 2013
Thanks Given: 33
Thanks Received: 379


tradethetick View Post
Would you please clarify numbers 3 and 4. I am not sure what you mean by 10 times vs 6 or 10 at 30K but 12 at 150K?

Sure. This is assuming the trader trades the full maximum allowed number of contracts all the time, and to make it easier, I will talk in ES points instead of dollars:

1. In the 30K Combine both the Max. DD and the profit target (PT) are 10 points away. So the challenge boils down to this: Can you make 10 ES points without losing no more than 10 points? (3.3 points daily)

2. In the 150 Combine the max DD is only 6 points away and the PT is farer, 12 points. So the same question goes like this: Can you make 12 ES points without losing no more than 6 points? (this is the exact same question in Combine 100K, so basicly no difference)

Now I will include the cheapest Combine here just for comparison:

3. Can you make 20 points without losing no more than 20 points? (6 pts daily) As you see the PT is higher but you have the max. wiggle room here.

Now because of these 2 variables PT and max. DD, the only way you can turn the higher combines into an advantage is by NOT playing it with full position.

Let's say you pay for the 100K Combine, but only play half of the max. position. Then your question is:

4. Can you make 24 ES points without losing no more than 12 points?

The volatility has been huge lately so one can make a lot (or lose a lot) using way less than maximum size.

Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)
 mlarocco 
East Greenbush, NY
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Broker - AMP Data - Rithmic
Trading: CL, FDAX, TF, YM, NQ
Posts: 40 since Mar 2011
Thanks Given: 4
Thanks Received: 43



Pedro40 View Post
Sure. This is assuming the trader trades the full maximum allowed number of contracts all the time, and to make it easier, I will talk in ES points instead of dollars:

1. In the 30K Combine both the Max. DD and the profit target (PT) are 10 points away. So the challenge boils down to this: Can you make 10 ES points without losing no more than 10 points? (3.3 points daily)

2. In the 150 Combine the max DD is only 6 points away and the PT is farer, 12 points. So the same question goes like this: Can you make 12 ES points without losing no more than 6 points? (this is the exact same question in Combine 100K, so basicly no difference)

Now I will include the cheapest Combine here just for comparison:

3. Can you make 20 points without losing no more than 20 points? (6 pts daily) As you see the PT is higher but you have the max. wiggle room here.

Now because of these 2 variables PT and max. DD, the only way you can turn the higher combines into an advantage is by NOT playing it with full position.

Let's say you pay for the 100K Combine, but only play half of the max. position. Then your question is:

4. Can you make 24 ES points without losing no more than 12 points?

The volatility has been huge lately so one can make a lot (or lose a lot) using way less than maximum size.

I really wish I read/thought of this BEFORE I got into the $150K combine. A real eye opener....... Thanks!

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #84 (permalink)
 
bobwest's Avatar
 bobwest 
Western Florida
Site Moderator
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra Chart
Trading: ES, YM
Frequency: Several times daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 8,162 since Jan 2013
Thanks Given: 57,343
Thanks Received: 26,267


mlarocco View Post
I really wish I read/thought of this BEFORE I got into the $150K combine. A real eye opener....... Thanks!

I've done a 150K, unsuccessfully. I would add that there is a big temptation to use too much size, (1) because it's available and (2) because the profit target is high, and you think you have to. It is uncommon to do this assessment of size in terms of the loss and drawdown limits vs. target, as well as the impact of over-sizing your trading if you don't already successfully trade larger size (big size means big losses, too.) But everyone should.

There is also a temptation to go for the largest Combine in order to have the largest funded account, "when" you pass the Combine (as if that were so easy.) It is better to pass the thing in the first place, at any level, before making decisions about any funded account down the road.

Just a footnote to @Pedro40's excellent analysis.

Bob.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #85 (permalink)
emini2000
Atlanta GA USA
 
Posts: 285 since Aug 2013
Thanks Given: 70
Thanks Received: 271


bobwest View Post
I would just add the 50K, because the higher daily loss and max drawdown numbers give you more breathing room, and it's just another $15 over the cost of the 30.

I chose the 30k for the reasons listed in the other post. The reason I did it over the 50k is that your profit requirement doubles, and I didn't want to trade more than a couple of contracts anyway. I just think the $1500 is easier to hit than the 3k.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #86 (permalink)
 mlarocco 
East Greenbush, NY
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Broker - AMP Data - Rithmic
Trading: CL, FDAX, TF, YM, NQ
Posts: 40 since Mar 2011
Thanks Given: 4
Thanks Received: 43


bobwest View Post
I've done a 150K, unsuccessfully. I would add that there is a big temptation to use too much size, (1) because it's available and (2) because the profit target is high, and you think you have to. It is uncommon to do this assessment of size in terms of the loss and drawdown limits vs. target, as well as the impact of over-sizing your trading if you don't already successfully trade larger size (big size means big losses, too.) But everyone should.

There is also a temptation to go for the largest Combine in order to have the largest funded account, "when" you pass the Combine (as if that were so easy.) It is better to pass the thing in the first place, at any level, before making decisions about any funded account down the road.

Just a footnote to @Pedro40's excellent analysis.

Bob.

The really ironic part is, I have been trading 3 contracts on the $150K combine anyway. I looked back thru my trades and I would have qualified for the $30K combine in 6 days! I should have probably been doing the $30K all along. Since I just paid the $375 for the next month of the $150K, I'll continue it up until it's due again, either I'll complete it or drop back to a $30K combine.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #87 (permalink)
emini2000
Atlanta GA USA
 
Posts: 285 since Aug 2013
Thanks Given: 70
Thanks Received: 271


mlarocco View Post
The really ironic part is, I have been trading 3 contracts on the $150K combine anyway. I looked back thru my trades and I would have qualified for the $30K combine in 6 days! I should have probably been doing the $30K all along. Since I just paid the $375 for the next month of the $150K, I'll continue it up until it's due again, either I'll complete it or drop back to a $30K combine.

Exactly, just as I posted above. I did the 30k due to the fact I wasn't going to trade more than 3 anyway, and $1500 is an easier goal than the next level of 3k profit.

Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)
Pedro40
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
 
Posts: 564 since Jan 2013
Thanks Given: 33
Thanks Received: 379


mlarocco View Post
The really ironic part is, I have been trading 3 contracts on the $150K combine anyway. I looked back thru my trades and I would have qualified for the $30K combine in 6 days! I should have probably been doing the $30K all along. Since I just paid the $375 for the next month of the $150K, I'll continue it up until it's due again, either I'll complete it or drop back to a $30K combine.

Don't feel too bad, at least you were smart enough not to trade full size. Although 3 contracts maybe a bit low now, specially that you are in profits. As long as you keep making money you will eventually reach the profit target, it is just going to cost you a lot, at a minimum of 2 months fees.

If I were you, I would try very hard to reach the profit target by the 2nd month (it is rather doable) and if not, I would switch to a lower and cheaper combine. But if you are close to the target in the last few days, just swing it, there is nothing to lose at that time. I would not pay the 3rd month, that is just way too much. This continuous combine was designed to keep the players in the game.

Now let's suppose you do pass in 2 months, then you still have to deal with the LTP rules. If you felt the 150K Combine was too hard for you, I assume you could ask them to assign you to a lesser Combine's LTP.

Anyhow, you have already paid, so let's make a plan. Since there is about 40 trading days and your profit target is 9K, assuming fairly consistent trading you have to make 1.1K weekly or $220 daily on average. Now I don't know where you are exactly, but let's say if you are at day 25, you should be at 25 x 220=5500 profits. If less you have to raise your size, if more you can chill.

The point with this plan is that every day you should know where you are at with your average profits and step up in size or take it easy depending on the actual number. But this is just general guidance, and if you have better days, push those, and size down on days when the opportunities are not there.

Good luck with it. You might want to start a separate diary and we can try to guide you through it.

Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)
 
tradethetick's Avatar
 tradethetick 
Irvine, CA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Adv/TT
Trading: CL, GC, TF
Posts: 416 since Oct 2011
Thanks Given: 42
Thanks Received: 374

Pedro40 your input has been invaluable! I appreciate that very much as I am sure a lot of other people have as well. Thank you!!

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #90 (permalink)
trade62
boston mass
 
Posts: 1 since Apr 2014
Thanks Given: 1
Thanks Received: 0


Hi, I am considering a TopStep combine and perusing the board to learn all I can. I haven't yet read this entire 9 page thread but something jumped out at at me on the first 2 pages. Sorry if this was addressed later in the thread. I noticed you are taking profits at 5 and 10 ticks, but you're letting losers run 20+ ticks. That math will never work. Maybe think about disciplined stops (need to be fast with CL) and a bit more room on the upside. Best to you.

Reply With Quote




Last Updated on November 12, 2016


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts