Taking a Trading System Live - futures io
futures io futures trading



Taking a Trading System Live


Discussion in Trading Journals

Updated by tturner86
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one kevinkdog with 260 posts (714 thanks)
    2. looks_two Big Mike with 61 posts (97 thanks)
    3. looks_3 deaddog with 25 posts (24 thanks)
    4. looks_4 swz168 with 20 posts (40 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one kevinkdog with 2.7 thanks per post
    2. looks_two swz168 with 2.0 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 rk142 with 2.0 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Big Mike with 1.6 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 60,484 views
    2. thumb_up 1,128 thanks given
    3. group 97 followers
    1. forum 529 replies
    2. attach_file 189 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

Taking a Trading System Live

  #41 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,768 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,422 given, 5,326 received


Koepisch View Post
Excellent and fast analysis, great @kevinkdog! Due to the similarity of the results i would trust even more in the system. Furthermore you can trust your monte carlo analysis related money managment decisions - because it's BACKED with practical "What-if" "Start Trade Drawdown" analysis.

@Koepisch - I certainly appreciate you bringing this topic up! It is a worthwhile issue to discuss and understand.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Convert NinjaTrader NT7 indicator to Tradestation EasyLanguage and RADARSCREEN
Platforms and Indicators
Issue meeting order entry conditions
Elite Automated NinjaTrader Trading
Last 5 minutes Label
ThinkOrSwim
Moving average with Lag reduction
NinjaTrader
Linux?
ThinkOrSwim
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on futures io
June Charity Fundraiser - Feeding hungry families
50 thanks
FIO Journal Challenge - June 2020 edition w/SharkIndicators
49 thanks
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
43 thanks
Fixed vs trailing stops
29 thanks
AMP Futures / AMP Global Review
26 thanks
 
  #42 (permalink)
Austria, Vienna
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: CQG Trader, NT
Broker: Velocity
Trading: FDAX
 
Posts: 59 since Sep 2010
Thanks: 88 given, 55 received

Hello kevinkdog

I really love your thread and the way you determine your optimal position size. I am following a similar approach using Monte Carlo simulations and the maximum drawdown found via those simulations.

The 38% drawdown is something i would not want to see myself. Of course i am not suggesting that it is not right for you, i am merely curious as to why it is acceptable for you.

From your posts i assume you plan on rerunning the analysis with new data periodically to avoid "deviation from reality" in your position sizing. Is that correct?

Do you have a system stop loss over periods of time? Personally i am currently thinking about stopping the system when it is down a given amount (or % value) in X amount of time (1 week for example). I would the analyse the cause for this - maybe the system stopped to work, the markets changed fundamentally, flash crash, or maybe just some unprobable string of losses. If i find that i should trade the system despite this massive drawdown, i would start it again - with a system stop loss found by analysis including the new data.

Lastly, i recently read Van Tharp's book, and it really is a must read. Nassim Taleb's Fooled by Randomness is also good, although more on the philosophical side of things (but it nevertheless changed my approach to things).

What are your thoughts?

"I don't even see the code anymore. I just see blonde, brunette, redhead..." -Cipher, The Matrix
Reply With Quote
 
  #43 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,768 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,422 given, 5,326 received



ahwii View Post
Hello kevinkdog

I really love your thread and the way you determine your optimal position size. I am following a similar approach using Monte Carlo simulations and the maximum drawdown found via those simulations.

The 38% drawdown is something i would not want to see myself. Of course i am not suggesting that it is not right for you, i am merely curious as to why it is acceptable for you.

From your posts i assume you plan on rerunning the analysis with new data periodically to avoid "deviation from reality" in your position sizing. Is that correct?

Do you have a system stop loss over periods of time? Personally i am currently thinking about stopping the system when it is down a given amount (or % value) in X amount of time (1 week for example). I would the analyse the cause for this - maybe the system stopped to work, the markets changed fundamentally, flash crash, or maybe just some unprobable string of losses. If i find that i should trade the system despite this massive drawdown, i would start it again - with a system stop loss found by analysis including the new data.

Lastly, i recently read Van Tharp's book, and it really is a must read. Nassim Taleb's Fooled by Randomness is also good, although more on the philosophical side of things (but it nevertheless changed my approach to things).

What are your thoughts?

Thanks for the kind comments, @ahwii. Here are some answers:

1. The 38% drawdown is OK to me, mainly because I trade a bunch of different strategies, and diversification will help mitigate this large drawdown. I agree it is big, though - maybe I should be taking less risk.

2. I might change my position sizing ONLY if the system does really well. In that (hopeful) case, I would scale back the risk I am taking. If it happens, I will detail it here.

3. My "system stop" point is a $5,000 drawdown, based on trading a single contract. The will be the maximum. I may cut it shorter, probably not, but if I do I'll detail my reasoning in this thread.

4. I like most of what Tharp and Taleb have to say. I don't agree with everything, but their works stimulate (and sometimes change) my thinking on things.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
 
  #44 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,768 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,422 given, 5,326 received

Week 1 - In The Books

Here is summary info after the first week of trading...





Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
  #45 (permalink)
Site Administrator
Manta, Ecuador
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: My own custom solution
Trading: Emini Futures
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Posts: 48,776 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 31,485 given, 94,167 received


kevinkdog View Post
NOTE: This post scratches the surface of a complicated issue...proceed at your own risk...


OK, I ran the analysis. For everyone reading this, the issue is that, depending on your trade data, Monte Carlo analysis is not always a correct tool to use.

So, to first test this (is Monte Carlo OK to use?), I run something called the Durvin-Watson statistic. It checks for positive and negative autocorrelation. I think you can google search to find this for an Excel spreadsheet, what it means, etc. I'm no mathematician, so I will defer from getting into detail on this calculation.


Suffice it to say, for my NGEC system, the analysis says there is no autocorrelation issue, so I can use Monte Carlo analysis.


So to answer Koepisch's excellent question - how does Monte Carlo analysis compare with the "Start Trade Drawdown" analysis he mentions a couple of posts ago?


Again, without getting into too much detail, here are the results:




With the uncertainty of this whole analysis, it says that the 2 methods give very similar values for drawdown. The Monte Carlo gives more "worst case" scenarios - higher drawdowns than the Start Trade method, and this shows up as a greater standard deviation.


Thanks, Koepisch, for helping me add to the analysis here. The "Start Trade Drawdown" approach is verty interesting and useful.

New to me.

I am always trying to look at correlation across a portfolio. Can you briefly tell me what inputs you are using and if you are generating this data yourself and piping it to Excel, or some other tool?

My hurdle has been trying to feed a dozen strategies (trade output) into Excel, having to do it manually is less than ideal.

Mike

We're here to help -- just ask

For the best trading education, watch our webinars
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list

Follow us on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook

Support our community as an Elite Member:
https://futures.io/elite/
Follow me on Twitter Visit my Facebook Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
  #46 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,768 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,422 given, 5,326 received


Big Mike View Post
New to me.

I am always trying to look at correlation across a portfolio. Can you briefly tell me what inputs you are using and if you are generating this data yourself and piping it to Excel, or some other tool?

My hurdle has been trying to feed a dozen strategies (trade output) into Excel, having to do it manually is less than ideal.

Mike

I basically just input the trade by trade P/Ls. I do it manually.

When I do a portfolio of strategies, I'll copy/paste the daily P/L to Excel.

Once in Excel, I'd do a correlation test over the time period of interest.

You are right, doing it manually many times would be cumbersome.

Doesn't Ninja have some sort of porting to Excel feature, or DDE link? That might make it more automated for you.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
 
  #47 (permalink)
Site Administrator
Manta, Ecuador
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: My own custom solution
Trading: Emini Futures
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Posts: 48,776 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 31,485 given, 94,167 received


kevinkdog View Post
Doesn't Ninja have some sort of porting to Excel feature, or DDE link? That might make it more automated for you.

I have threads on this, somewhere... basically I found it easier to write my own output. Unfortunately, still terrible. I want actual portfolio management, backtesting and reporting built-in to the platform, but there is no demand for it apparently.

Mike

We're here to help -- just ask

For the best trading education, watch our webinars
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list

Follow us on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook

Support our community as an Elite Member:
https://futures.io/elite/
Follow me on Twitter Visit my Facebook Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
  #48 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,768 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,422 given, 5,326 received


Big Mike View Post
I have threads on this, somewhere... basically I found it easier to write my own output. Unfortunately, still terrible. I want actual portfolio management, backtesting and reporting built-in to the platform, but there is no demand for it apparently.

Mike


I could guess at why there is no demand for it...the funny thing is, once you start trading multiple strategies, it takes on huge significance.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
  #49 (permalink)
Prince George BC Canada
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: IBs TWS
Broker: IB
Trading: Stocks
 
deaddog's Avatar
 
Posts: 789 since May 2013
Thanks: 118 given, 1,913 received


kevinkdog View Post
Here is summary info after the first week of trading...

Is that the summary for the week or for today.

It would be nice if you could present it in the same format s the daily combine report or at least on a trade by trade basis. It makes it easier for us novices to follow.

Reply With Quote
 
  #50 (permalink)
Austria, Vienna
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: CQG Trader, NT
Broker: Velocity
Trading: FDAX
 
Posts: 59 since Sep 2010
Thanks: 88 given, 55 received



kevinkdog View Post
Thanks for the kind comments, @ahwii. Here are some answers:

1. The 38% drawdown is OK to me, mainly because I trade a bunch of different strategies, and diversification will help mitigate this large drawdown. I agree it is big, though - maybe I should be taking less risk.

2. I might change my position sizing ONLY if the system does really well. In that (hopeful) case, I would scale back the risk I am taking. If it happens, I will detail it here.

3. My "system stop" point is a $5,000 drawdown, based on trading a single contract. The will be the maximum. I may cut it shorter, probably not, but if I do I'll detail my reasoning in this thread.

4. I like most of what Tharp and Taleb have to say. I don't agree with everything, but their works stimulate (and sometimes change) my thinking on things.

Thanks for the response!
So the drawdown number is for one strategy, which makes the overall max drawdown smaller because the strategies are uncorrelated. Seems i have misunderstood your posts as i thought it was for the whole portfolio. Makes sense now, thanks for clearing that up.

Thanks for addressing the other points as well, now i better understand what you are doing. Looking forward to you posting here!

Have a nice weekend

"I don't even see the code anymore. I just see blonde, brunette, redhead..." -Cipher, The Matrix
Reply With Quote



futures io Trading Community Trading Journals > Taking a Trading System Live




Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

Free BloodHound Licenses to everyone!

June
 

Every journal equals ten meals for the hungry

June
     



Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts