Taking a Trading System Live - futures io
futures io futures trading



Taking a Trading System Live


Discussion in Trading Journals

Updated by tturner86
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one kevinkdog with 260 posts (714 thanks)
    2. looks_two Big Mike with 61 posts (97 thanks)
    3. looks_3 deaddog with 25 posts (24 thanks)
    4. looks_4 swz168 with 20 posts (40 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one kevinkdog with 2.7 thanks per post
    2. looks_two swz168 with 2.0 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 rk142 with 2.0 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Big Mike with 1.6 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 64,478 views
    2. thumb_up 1,128 thanks given
    3. group 97 followers
    1. forum 529 replies
    2. attach_file 189 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Taking a Trading System Live

(login for full post details)
  #431 (permalink)
Sydney Australia
 
 
Posts: 8 since Mar 2014
Thanks: 6 given, 8 received

New to the board and just spent a while reading through from start to finish.

thanks for your honesty Kevin, been a good read. It's tricky watching a system go live after all the testing and seeing how it performs. I'm currently in the live SIM trading for my first system, it's good fun so far.

For me personally I couldn't handle this particular system, trades are way too infrequent for my tastes

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to rossw for this post:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Chart on TV, what platform is best for swing order entries?
Traders Hideout
SPY, QQQ Weekly Closing Range Probabilities
Traders Hideout
Market Replay and Fills (Denali data)
Sierra Chart
Historical option expirations
Brokers
Convert H Data TS to NT
NinjaTrader
 
 
(login for full post details)
  #432 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,846 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,488 given, 5,550 received


rossw View Post
New to the board and just spent a while reading through from start to finish.

thanks for your honesty Kevin, been a good read. It's tricky watching a system go live after all the testing and seeing how it performs. I'm currently in the live SIM trading for my first system, it's good fun so far.

For me personally I couldn't handle this particular system, trades are way too infrequent for my tastes


Lately, the system has been trading less and less, due to the volatility being lower.

Definitely, though, one has to trade systems he/she feels comfortable with.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #433 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,846 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,488 given, 5,550 received


Here are updated charts, etc through April 1, 2014.

The system is seriously underperforming expectations. It is not trading nearly as much as its historic norm, due to lower volatility of EC. I am going to keep going with this, per the plan detailed at the beginning of the thread.

This whole thread does bring up an interesting point - you can do everything correctly during development, and things still might not go as planned. I kind of compare it to an Olympic athlete. He or she trains and trains, and then when the competition is held, a lot of factors can help or prevent that person from winning. He may have done everything correctly in preparing, and still lose.

Of course, one could argue that this system was nowhere near Olympic athlete caliber to begin with!!!!








Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 8 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #434 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,846 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,488 given, 5,550 received

This week (one trade in particular) was a good one... now the performance is at a point where the overall account is underwater only because of position sizing. If I have traded just constant size throughout, I'd be up about 10%.


Of course, this week's performance also exposes the weakness in this trading system - it needs big winning trades to create positive performance. Without the big trades, the system is blah. And, we have not had many big trades since going live. Only 2 trades about $500 profit, with Thursday's win by far the biggest.

When volatility returns to EC, I suspect we will see more big wins, and more trades in general.










Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 7 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #435 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,846 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,488 given, 5,550 received

Week 34 in the books. Decent enough week.

Overall the account is still down about 6% from start. This is mostly due to position sizing (when I traded 2 contracts, I had quite a few losers). Note if I had traded a single contract the whole time, I'd be up about 17%.


I'm curious: how many of you would still be trading these systems live? And, why or why not?


Be as blunt/brutal as you wish. You won't offend me. There is no right or wrong answer here, just fodder for discussion purposes...






Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #436 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Quebec
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader wt Rancho Dinero's profiling tools
Broker: AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, NQ, YM
 
trendisyourfriend's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,933 since Oct 2009
Thanks: 3,582 given, 5,048 received


kevinkdog View Post
..
I'm curious: how many of you would still be trading these systems live? And, why or why not?

I would have some difficulties. I would consider it a lost of time and money. Obviously my answer is based on some assumptions, ie, you depend on it to live and have no other income.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to trendisyourfriend for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #437 (permalink)
bangkok
 
 
Posts: 16 since Dec 2013
Thanks: 17 given, 12 received

i will follow the initial plan . But as a further rule I would probably stop the program if maxdd become a newer number and start to revise all the strategy structure.

Further I saw that the equity line has a dangerous and slow movement. Have you considered to put a switch refered to the volatility?

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to coccigelus for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #438 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,846 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,488 given, 5,550 received


trendisyourfriend View Post
I would have some difficulties. I would consider it a lost of time and money. Obviously my answer is based on some assumptions, ie, you depend on it to live and have no other income.

Good points. If this system was your only source of income, you'd be better off volunteering your time at a soup kitchen (and if you'd continue trading this system probably soon enough you'd be on the other side of the ladle ).

In your trading, do you depend on one strategy/market to make a living?

I use to try to do just that - I'd look for a super tremendous strategy that by itself would be sufficient. Eventually, I found that was nearly impossible (at least for me).

So, I diversify systems, markets, etc. That helps a lot. But even then, this system is not "carrying its weight" compared to what it should do.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #439 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,846 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,488 given, 5,550 received


coccigelus View Post
i will follow the initial plan . But as a further rule I would probably stop the program if maxdd become a newer number and start to revise all the strategy structure.

Thanks for the comment.

It is nice having a civilized conversation here, as opposed to the drama at another forum, right @coccigelus ?

Stopping when the max historical dd is hit is a pretty good stopping point, even though many people say "your worst drawdown is always in the future." So, I sometimes use 1.5 * max dd.

Just for reference, based on 1 contract, the historical max dd is $3,265. Since I started trading live, the max dd on one contract has been about $1,800.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #440 (permalink)
bangkok
 
 
Posts: 16 since Dec 2013
Thanks: 17 given, 12 received



kevinkdog View Post
Good points. If this system was your only source of income, you'd be better off volunteering your time at a soup kitchen (and if you'd continue trading this system probably soon enough you'd be on the other side of the ladle ).

In your trading, do you depend on one strategy/market to make a living?

I use to try to do just that - I'd look for a super tremendous strategy that by itself would be sufficient. Eventually, I found that was nearly impossible (at least for me).

So, I diversify systems, markets, etc. That helps a lot. But even then, this system is not "carrying its weight" compared to what it should do.

Did you think to put the same weights to each trading system to keep your portfolio balanced ?

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to coccigelus for this post:


futures io Trading Community Trading Journals > Taking a Trading System Live


January 6, 2016


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

Bookmap

Nov TBD
     



Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts