Taking a Trading System Live - futures io
futures io futures trading



Taking a Trading System Live


Discussion in Trading Journals

Updated January 6th 2016 by tturner86
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one kevinkdog with 260 posts (714 thanks)
    2. looks_two Big Mike with 61 posts (97 thanks)
    3. looks_3 deaddog with 25 posts (24 thanks)
    4. looks_4 swz168 with 20 posts (40 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one kevinkdog with 2.7 thanks per post
    2. looks_two swz168 with 2.0 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 rk142 with 2.0 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Big Mike with 1.6 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 60,544 views
    2. thumb_up 1,128 thanks given
    3. group 97 followers
    1. forum 529 replies
    2. attach_file 189 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Taking a Trading System Live

(login for full post details)
  #31 (permalink)
Lübeck, Germany
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader, MT4
Broker: FXCM, Interactive Brokers, Oanda
Trading: Forex
 
JGSmith's Avatar
 
Posts: 137 since Aug 2013
Thanks: 55 given, 46 received

I quite enjoy reading your posts. Very good and very thought out. As you mentioned, you are not saying it is the best way, but at least it is well thought out and therefore, if there is an issues, it should be easy to find where it went wrong based on how you are thinking through things.

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Convert NinjaTrader NT7 indicator to Tradestation EasyLanguage and RADARSCREEN
Platforms and Indicators
Issue meeting order entry conditions
Elite Automated NinjaTrader Trading
Last 5 minutes Label
ThinkOrSwim
Moving average with Lag reduction
NinjaTrader
Linux?
ThinkOrSwim
 
 
(login for full post details)
  #32 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,768 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,422 given, 5,327 received


JGSmith View Post
I quite enjoy reading your posts. Very good and very thought out. As you mentioned, you are not saying it is the best way, but at least it is well thought out and therefore, if there is an issues, it should be easy to find where it went wrong based on how you are thinking through things.

Thanks. Of course, if anyone thinks there is a better way for me to do any of us (better position sizing, more reliable and cheaper broker, etc), please feel free to contribute. Such suggestions will make this thread even better, as we test, evaluate and compare the alternatives.

Kevin

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #33 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,768 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,422 given, 5,327 received

Always Nice To Start Positive


Whenever I start a new strategy live, it is always nice to start with a profit.

Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to happen too often for me! Maybe it is just me, or maybe I just remember the down days - I don't know.

Anyhow, 2 trades today, automation worked as expected (I'll go into detail on automation on a later post).

Here's the tracking graph I'll be using (I will show and describe all tools I will be using to track this strategy as time progresses).


Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 5 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #34 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,768 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,422 given, 5,327 received

A Little More About Expected Results

In a previous post, I presented some results with fixed fractional position sizing. Basically, the results say that in an "average" year (meaning, 50% of years will be worse, and 50% of years will be better), I expect to make $30,735 profit in that year, and hit a maximum drawdown of 38.1% sometime during the year.

That profit number seems a little too good to be true...and my motto is "if something seems too good to be true, it probably is." And that profit number does seem too good to be true. 362% rate of return in that first year. Seems high...

Remember, though, the actual rate of return could be just about anywhere on the spectrum. It is just that the 362% is the median value.

Below is a histogram of possible returns. It will be interesting to see if the Year 1 results is anywhere close to the median ending equity (black vertical line). If it is, I will be very happy. I'll still be happy if I even hit the 25% mark, which is a final equity of about $21000, which is 147% return for the year. Still in "too good to be true" region.


Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #35 (permalink)
Lübeck, Germany
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader, MT4
Broker: FXCM, Interactive Brokers, Oanda
Trading: Forex
 
JGSmith's Avatar
 
Posts: 137 since Aug 2013
Thanks: 55 given, 46 received

Is that Monte Carlo? If so, then that is not quite what it is saying though it is a similar statement. That technically is saying that 50% of the time, final balance is that amount or less.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #36 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,768 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,422 given, 5,327 received


JGSmith View Post
Is that Monte Carlo? If so, then that is not quite what it is saying though it is a similar statement. That technically is saying that 50% of the time, final balance is that amount or less.

Yes, it is based on Monte Carlo. Can you explain the statement "that is not quite what it is saying..." - I am not sure I understand.

Are you referring to my statement: "Basically, the results say that in an "average" year (meaning, 50% of years will be worse, and 50% of years will be better), I expect to make $30,735 profit in that year, and hit a maximum drawdown of 38.1% sometime during the year." I know I am using the term "average" incorrectly in this sentence (hence the quotes around it), as it is really the median value - the true average would be much higher, due to the spike at the far right of the histogram.

Thanks in advance!

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #37 (permalink)
@ Germany
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus Futures/Zen-Fire
Trading: FDAX
 
Posts: 490 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 353 given, 411 received

Start-Trade DrawDown

@kevinkdog: I'm an attentive follower of your thread and very appreciate the granularity of your analysis. In another thread we have discussed the measuring of drawdowns und i've wrote my primary style of drawdown analysis here https://futures.io/traders-hideout/24308-how-compare-drawdown-metrics.html#post279260. Recently i've found a term for my Kind of analysis "Start-Trade DrawDown". It's mentioned in Keith Fitschen newest book "Building Reliable Trading Systems" which i can strongly recommend.

With a default monte carlo analysis you ignore the result dependency of subsequent trades. I refer to "Winning strikes" and "Loosing strikes". It could be a huge difference in your money management if you have an strongly trade-to-trade correlated system. In one of my books i have an algorithm to test that. With an "Start-Trade DrawDown" analysis you can see what your largest drawdown would be, if you had started your system at every day in the last x years.

I'm courios to see the difference between both methods.

Koepisch

Edit: "result dependency of subsequent trades" means "serial correlation" - thanks kevinkdog, sometimes it's hard for a non native speaker

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #38 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,768 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,422 given, 5,327 received


Koepisch View Post
@kevinkdog: I'm an attentive follower of your thread and very appreciate the granularity of your analysis. In another thread we have discussed the measuring of drawdowns und i've wrote my primary style of drawdown analysis here https://futures.io/traders-hideout/24308-how-compare-drawdown-metrics.html#post279260. Recently i've found a term for my Kind of analysis "Start-Trade DrawDown". It's mentioned in Keith Fitschen newest book "Building Reliable Trading Systems" which i can strongly recommend.

With a default monte carlo analysis you ignore the result dependency of subsequent trades. I refer to "Winning strikes" and "Loosing strikes". It could be a huge difference in your money management if you have an strongly trade-to-trade correlated system. In one of my books i have an algorithm to test that. With an "Start-Trade DrawDown" analysis you can see what your largest drawdown would be, if you had started your system at every day in the last x years.

I'm courios to see the difference between both methods.

Koepisch


Yes, I agree with you:

If there is serial correlation in your data (where the result of Trade X is related to the result of Trade X-1), the Monte Carlo analysis is not 100% appropriate.

To test this, I usually use a Durbin-Watson statistic. I find, for most of my systems, they do not have this serial or auto correlation issue.

When I get a chance, I will try to run the "start trade drawdown" - I think it would be useful. If it looks a lot different than the Monte Carlo, then that will be VERY interesting!

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #39 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,768 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,422 given, 5,327 received


Koepisch View Post
@kevinkdog: I'm an attentive follower of your thread and very appreciate the granularity of your analysis. In another thread we have discussed the measuring of drawdowns und i've wrote my primary style of drawdown analysis here https://futures.io/traders-hideout/24308-how-compare-drawdown-metrics.html#post279260. Recently i've found a term for my Kind of analysis "Start-Trade DrawDown". It's mentioned in Keith Fitschen newest book "Building Reliable Trading Systems" which i can strongly recommend.

With a default monte carlo analysis you ignore the result dependency of subsequent trades. I refer to "Winning strikes" and "Loosing strikes". It could be a huge difference in your money management if you have an strongly trade-to-trade correlated system. In one of my books i have an algorithm to test that. With an "Start-Trade DrawDown" analysis you can see what your largest drawdown would be, if you had started your system at every day in the last x years.

I'm courios to see the difference between both methods.

Koepisch

Edit: "result dependency of subsequent trades" means "serial correlation" - thanks kevinkdog, sometimes it's hard for a non native speaker


NOTE: This post scratches the surface of a complicated issue...proceed at your own risk...


OK, I ran the analysis. For everyone reading this, the issue is that, depending on your trade data, Monte Carlo analysis is not always a correct tool to use.

So, to first test this (is Monte Carlo OK to use?), I run something called the Durvin-Watson statistic. It checks for positive and negative autocorrelation. I think you can google search to find this for an Excel spreadsheet, what it means, etc. I'm no mathematician, so I will defer from getting into detail on this calculation.


Suffice it to say, for my NGEC system, the analysis says there is no autocorrelation issue, so I can use Monte Carlo analysis.


So to answer Koepisch's excellent question - how does Monte Carlo analysis compare with the "Start Trade Drawdown" analysis he mentions a couple of posts ago?


Again, without getting into too much detail, here are the results:




With the uncertainty of this whole analysis, it says that the 2 methods give very similar values for drawdown. The Monte Carlo gives more "worst case" scenarios - higher drawdowns than the Start Trade method, and this shows up as a greater standard deviation.


Thanks, Koepisch, for helping me add to the analysis here. The "Start Trade Drawdown" approach is verty interesting and useful.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #40 (permalink)
@ Germany
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus Futures/Zen-Fire
Trading: FDAX
 
Posts: 490 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 353 given, 411 received



kevinkdog View Post
NOTE: This post scratches the surface of a complicated issue...proceed at your own risk...


...

With the uncertainty of this whole analysis, it says that the 2 methods give very similar values for drawdown. The Monte Carlo gives more "worst case" scenarios - higher drawdowns than the Start Trade method, and this shows up as a greater standard deviation.

Thanks, Koepisch, for helping me add to the analysis here. The "Start Trade Drawdown" approach is verty interesting and useful.

Excellent and fast analysis, great @kevinkdog! Due to the similarity of the results i would trust even more in the system. Furthermore you can trust your monte carlo analysis related money managment decisions - because it's BACKED with practical "What-if" "Start Trade Drawdown" analysis.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Koepisch for this post:


futures io Trading Community Trading Journals > Taking a Trading System Live


January 6, 2016


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

Free BloodHound Licenses for everyone!

June
 

Every journal equals ten meals for the hungry

June
     



Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts