Kevin's TST Combine Journal - futures io
futures io futures trading



Kevin's TST Combine Journal


Discussion in Trading Journals

Updated by kevinkdog
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one kevinkdog with 237 posts (639 thanks)
    2. looks_two Big Mike with 34 posts (61 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Pedro40 with 27 posts (19 thanks)
    4. looks_4 deaddog with 20 posts (12 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Silver Dragon with 3.0 thanks per post
    2. looks_two kevinkdog with 2.7 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Big Mike with 1.8 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Pedro40 with 0.7 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 69,541 views
    2. thumb_up 885 thanks given
    3. group 59 followers
    1. forum 460 replies
    2. attach_file 138 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Kevin's TST Combine Journal

(login for full post details)
  #331 (permalink)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
 
 
Posts: 563 since Jan 2013
Thanks: 33 given, 375 received

Yes, you can go below the max. DD, as long as you bring it back by the close. I have done it more than once. If I recall, you can actually close the trade too, and start with a new one, as long as the DLL hasn't been hit.

Doesn't really make sense, but that is how it works....

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to Pedro40 for this post:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Thinkscript for scanning in Option Hacker
ThinkOrSwim
3x Fangdango
Traders Hideout
Macros for flatten and reverse
TradeStation
How to search for a symbol's closing value
EasyLanguage Programming
Degiro Negative Balance Advice
Traders Hideout
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on futures io
VWAP for stock index futures trading?
57 thanks
Price Action Kewltech Style
20 thanks
Coronavirus COVID-19
19 thanks
Trying to locate prop firm that purchased my automated trading system
11 thanks
Trading natural gas futures
9 thanks
 
(login for full post details)
  #332 (permalink)
Site Administrator
Manta, Ecuador
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: My own custom solution
Trading: Emini Futures
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Posts: 49,057 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 31,658 given, 95,056 received


Pedro40 View Post
Doesn't really make sense, but that is how it works....

It has to simply be a loophole due to technology implementation on the reporting side. I would certainly imagine that a live funded trader, who has a live risk manager, would not be allowed to repeat the same thing.

You should ask in the TopstepTrader AMA thread.

Mike

We're here to help -- just ask

For the best trading education, watch our webinars
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list

Follow us on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook

Support our community as an Elite Member:
https://futures.io/elite/
Follow me on Twitter Visit my Facebook Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to Big Mike for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #333 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,806 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,453 given, 5,418 received



Big Mike View Post
Hmm.

I would feel bad.

I am just an outsider looking in, so take that with a grain of salt naturally. But, it seems to me the strategy was overleveraged from the start which is causing these issues.

Being forced to skip a trade because of risk management, account sizing, etc, is a flaw in the original strategy, in my opinion. And trying to cherry pick which trades are worth taking, trying to manipulate the size of the trade on the fly, etc -- well, none of it was part of the original backtest, based on my understanding. So you are greatly altering the results.

If I can be so bold, and hopefully not piss you off because I like you, this thread, and want you to come do more futures.io (formerly BMT) webinars --- I think the issue here is a bit of ego. You have a sense of needing to prove yourself publicly and don't want to fail a combine. This is affecting your decisions.

Normally, I am all for public accountability. Most people in that situation are struggling traders that need the accountability to stop making really stupid decisions (to be frank). But in this case, I think you are a good trader already, and are feeling some pressure to publicly demonstrate that, which is leading to some bad choices.

I hope it somehow helps.

Mike

Thanks for the comments. I do appreciate them, and I like seeing the perspective of readers on this Combine.

The Max Drawdown rule was, in hindsight, something that I did not spend enough time preparing for. Of course, now I am dealing with it, so we'll see how that goes...

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #334 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,806 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,453 given, 5,418 received

I forgot to post Day 3 results, so here are Day 3 and Day 4 results. I have included the trade I did not take because of the risk of ruin in the "perfect" calculation .

Next trade will be 1 contract. It will increase to 2 for the trade after, if the win is big enough.







Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #335 (permalink)
Site Administrator
Manta, Ecuador
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: My own custom solution
Trading: Emini Futures
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Posts: 49,057 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 31,658 given, 95,056 received

Speaking of risk of ruin, have you seen this thread:



Since you have a lot of experience in this area I would welcome your thoughts on that thread, if you think anything can be added to the discussion and spreadsheets.

Mike

We're here to help -- just ask

For the best trading education, watch our webinars
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list

Follow us on Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook

Support our community as an Elite Member:
https://futures.io/elite/
Follow me on Twitter Visit my Facebook Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Big Mike for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #336 (permalink)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
 
 
Posts: 563 since Jan 2013
Thanks: 33 given, 375 received


Big Mike View Post
It has to simply be a loophole due to technology implementation on the reporting side.

That would make sense as an explanation, but this rule is actually included among the rules, so it looks like it is intentional...

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Pedro40 for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #337 (permalink)
Como Italy
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninjatrader, customized
Trading: ES
 
Posts: 526 since Feb 2010
Thanks: 471 given, 640 received

It just means that the absolute maximum drawdown you can hit is (max DD -1) + Daily Loss Limit. So the risk still has a hard limit.

I would think if you're dropping into that zone much intraday, you could still pass the combine but would be unlikely to be funded.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to futuretrader for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #338 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,806 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,453 given, 5,418 received

2 trades today, 2 small winners. With both trades, I traded only 1 contract, per the plan.

Due to increased equity, next trade will be for 2 contracts. So, with my luck, it will probably be a loser!

Big Mike had mentioned a couple of times that he thought I was overleveraged, trading 6 contracts at the beginning. Sizing that big at the start definitely hurt me (it would have helped a lot had I had some winning trades, of course). To "normalize" the results, I include a chart at the bottom of trading 2 contracts for each trade. That should give everyone an indication of how position sizing is helping or hurting my overall performance.

So far, as Big Mike pointed out, my position sizing is really hurting my performance.







Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 4 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #339 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,806 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,453 given, 5,418 received


Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #340 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker: Tradestation, DeCarley, others
Trading: futures
 
Posts: 2,806 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,453 given, 5,418 received


Slowly clawing my way back. Next trade will still be for 2 contracts, and if it is a decent size winner, I will increase to 3 contracts.

As I had mentioned before the Combine 2 started, I am using position sizing that is designed to maximize profit, while still respecting the Daily Loss Limit. Plus, it now has to account for the Max Drawdown.

So, for each trade so far, the position size may have varied from 1 to 6 contracts, but in each trade I followed a set schedule for size.

Why do I mention this? Mainly, I want to be clear that position size decisions are not made in the heat of the moment (which almost never ends well). I recommend people make those decisions beforehand, when they have a clear mind and focus. Then, just execute to the plan.


Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 5 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:


futures io Trading Community Trading Journals > Kevin's TST Combine Journal


April 26, 2014


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

An Afternoon With futures io member TropicalTrader

Elite only
     



Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts