TST Combine Journal - futures io
futures io futures trading



TST Combine Journal


Discussion in Trading Journals

Updated by JTurner77
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one indextrader7 with 265 posts (970 thanks)
    2. looks_two josh with 28 posts (91 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Big Mike with 16 posts (55 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Pedro40 with 16 posts (13 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one rubyslippage with 18.7 thanks per post
    2. looks_two indextrader7 with 3.7 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Big Mike with 3.4 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 josh with 3.3 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 75,540 views
    2. thumb_up 1,774 thanks given
    3. group 85 followers
    1. forum 556 replies
    2. attach_file 50 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

Closed Thread
 
Search this Thread
 

TST Combine Journal

(login for full post details)
  #181 (permalink)
Birmingham, AL
 
 
Posts: 1,065 since Apr 2012


SteveH View Post
I'm pretty sure that it takes close to a 60% winning pct for reverse position sizing to work out in the long term. Carrying your largest loser per trade from the initial entry while peeling off contracts on the winners raises the avg loser per trade and lowers the avg winner. The higher winning pct is needed to make the expectation formula a positive number.

Nope.


Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
QDEL
Stocks and ETFs
Dollar crash in 2021
Currencies
I have segregated my investment and trading
Psychology and Money Management
Degiro Negative Balance Advice
Traders Hideout
Macros for flatten and reverse
TradeStation
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on futures io
VWAP for stock index futures trading?
41 thanks
Coronavirus COVID-19
20 thanks
Price Action Kewltech Style
19 thanks
Is back testing a waste of time?
13 thanks
Emini 4 Tick Scalp still valid?
12 thanks
 
(login for full post details)
  #182 (permalink)
Orlando, Florida, USA
 
 
Posts: 34 since Oct 2010
Thanks: 3 given, 96 received


indextrader7 View Post
Nope.

I'll put it another way. 60% LT is the not have to worry level. In the 50-55% area, the greater the dependency on higher contract levels for the net gains to provide desirable levels of income. That's the razor's edge where there can be no mental / emotional breakdowns for very long.

I won't belabor it. Everyone has to find out for themselves. I am going by personal experience here. I immediately stopped within the first year of trading (coming up on 9 yrs ago) when I came across that page by Tharp. It might be interesting though (for me) to construct a spreadsheet to simulate it.

The following 2 users say Thank You to SteveH for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #183 (permalink)
Birmingham, AL
 
 
Posts: 1,065 since Apr 2012



SteveH View Post
I'll put it another way. 60% LT is the not have to worry level. In the 50-55% area, the greater the dependency on higher contract levels for the net gains to provide desirable levels of income. That's the razor's edge where there can be no mental / emotional breakdowns for very long.

I won't belabor it. Everyone has to find out for themselves. I am going by personal experience here. I immediately stopped within the first year of trading (coming up on 9 yrs ago) when I came across that page by Tharp. It might be interesting though (for me) to construct a spreadsheet to simulate it.

I genuinely appreciate your input.

I think you are right, as far as hard $/math goes. Some type of all-in, all-out approach with a good edge provides the best results. I could care less though. I think we all have to find what works for us, as emotional beings, not machines trading edges. Personally, if I can get into a position, and scale out some of it to help manage risk, it puts me at ease and allows me to truly relax and remain objective for the remainder of the position trade. Plus I can scale in and out around that position trade.

Here's how I did that on my last trade today in ES:



Sure..... you could sit there and armchair-quarterback my personal trading.... that I should have bought all-in at 1540 and exited all out at 1549... but I won't even entertain that. I embrace the uncertainty, and my scale outs will limit my upside, but they will also limit my downside when I don't get the continued trend move such as I got today. I'm good with the pros and the cons of it.

 
(login for full post details)
  #184 (permalink)
Birmingham, AL
 
 
Posts: 1,065 since Apr 2012

Ok, done for today. Got some other things to take care of.

All ES trading today.

First trade was looking for the long term wedge, which we gapped down below, to hold price as we pulled back to it. (Although this was in conflict to my view that the massive gap down was an overreaction to news from such a small country. Come on, this type of action is not going to spread to "real" countries.) I made it "difficult" for the market to get to my stop, since it had to breach the wedge, a resistance level, and the overnight highs. Anyways, took a full 2pt stop loss.

Second Trade By now we've broken back into the wedge, above the o/n highs, and that resistance level. So I get long on the first pullback. No real sellers in sight. Scaled out of 2/6 for +2pts, add the 2 lots back on a pullback, scale them back off again, scale out a 2nd 2-lots at the next normal rotation up for +3.25pts, and took the remainder off at a hard target (which was the RTH lows from yesterday) for +5.5pts. Now I'm flat.

Third Trade The market soared through the hard target I had for the last exit (49.00) for a 6.25pt rotation, vs the normal 3pt rotations I was trading before... but we got a nice pullback to that 49 level, and I put on a full position. At this point (time of day, as well as satisfied with the profits) I had no real risk appetite. I took off 4/6 lots for +1pt. The last two lots were trailed out for -0.5pts.

That was it for me today. I glanced over at CL a few times, and was glad not to be a part of it.

Here's the chart of the trades.


 
(login for full post details)
  #185 (permalink)
Birmingham, AL
 
 
Posts: 1,065 since Apr 2012

I'm having to manually update my trade analyzer data, while I get my account funded at S5. Yuck!

Notice how much better my returns are compared to the amount of risk/heat I take for these ES results vs what I was doing in CL. It's quite significant.


 
(login for full post details)
  #186 (permalink)
prague, czech republic
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT7, MT4
Broker: LMAX
Trading: DAX, Gold, Euro
 
xelaar's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,517 since Feb 2013
Thanks: 1,740 given, 2,565 received


SteveH View Post

Mark Douglas was into RPS...now he's a trading psych guru.

Do you mean he's done as a trader and now became a "teacher"?

Follow me on Twitter Visit my futures io Trade Journal
 
(login for full post details)
  #187 (permalink)
prague, czech republic
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT7, MT4
Broker: LMAX
Trading: DAX, Gold, Euro
 
xelaar's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,517 since Feb 2013
Thanks: 1,740 given, 2,565 received


indextrader7 View Post

Sure..... you could sit there and armchair-quarterback my personal trading.... that I should have bought all-in at 1540 and exited all out at 1549... but I won't even entertain that. I embrace the uncertainty, and my scale outs will limit my upside, but they will also limit my downside when I don't get the continued trend move such as I got today. I'm good with the pros and the cons of it.

I think it certainly has a merit, in a sence Van Tarp is talking about long term trading with scaling out based on gradual profit targets, like every 100 ticks or so. However if first scalping scale out used for example to finance your runner/swing portion, it certainly has a merit for a system that focuses on swinging. I think it makes no sense to talk about percentages without knowing what average MFE would be and target R:R. If you use this approach and your target is 10 times the risk and you can pull it off at least 2 times out of 10, then you will be in the money.

Thanks for your journal!

PS Van Tarp also mentions with regards to scalpers, I guess little or none scalpers use scaling out, because they target high win percentage and scalping entries bear little or no sense with regards to general sentiment and taking swing trades out of them is just gambling price will go your way and won't get you stopped before it does - very low odds bet. On opposite if you are taking a swing trade with larger stop and scale out on scalping porting to finance you runner, it does make sense.

Follow me on Twitter Visit my futures io Trade Journal
The following user says Thank You to xelaar for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #188 (permalink)
Legendary Market Wizard
Georgia, US
 
Experience: None
Platform: SC
Broker: AMP+CQG
Trading: ES, HSI, Nikkei
 
josh's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,466 since Jan 2011
Thanks: 6,054 given, 14,450 received


indextrader7 View Post
Notice how much better my returns are compared to the amount of risk/heat I take for these ES results vs what I was doing in CL. It's quite significant.

I love it!

Just to be clear, your "points per contract" view is not quite what it says it is--you are keeping a running total here of the average points made or loss per contract, per trade, right? Unless every trade has the same size, then the data will not be accurate (maybe it does, but one that does not will skew the data). For example, you can have Trade A be a 2 lot and make 2 handles per contract (for 4 total). Then you can have a 5 lot Trade B where you make 3 handles per contract (for 15 total). Your chart seems it would show a running average of 2.5, whereas in fact your average is 19/7 which is 2.71. Maybe I'm misinterpreting your data, but your chart type only works for ES points, not points per contract if I'm understanding what you're showing.

 
(login for full post details)
  #189 (permalink)
Birmingham, AL
 
 
Posts: 1,065 since Apr 2012


josh View Post
I love it!

Just to be clear, your "points per contract" view is not quite what it says it is--you are keeping a running total here of the average points made or loss per contract, per trade, right? Unless every trade has the same size, then the data will not be accurate (maybe it does, but one that does not will skew the data). For example, you can have Trade A be a 2 lot and make 2 handles per contract (for 4 total). Then you can have a 5 lot Trade B where you make 3 handles per contract (for 15 total). Your chart seems it would show a running average of 2.5, whereas in fact your average is 19/7 which is 2.71. Maybe I'm misinterpreting your data, but your chart type only works for ES points, not points per contract if I'm understanding what you're showing.

You're spot on Josh. Here's my rationale for why I have things the way they are.

- My plain ole' P/L numbers and equity chart will show me everything resulting from any fluctuations in size.

- My stats here, as they are calculated, show me a pure trading performance. This is in terms of.... ok.... Mr. Trader... what did you take from the market in terms of base units that the market fluctuates in... regardless of what size you traded... or anything else. It's a pure trader performance metric that can be 100% translateable to any other trader. Adjusting for other things, such as position size, muddies the waters and makes it impossible for us to look at each other's stats and measure pure performance.

This is absolutely my "soap box" issue for trading. I've preached it from day one here, but I'm certainly a minority. Most people use the method that you made 100 ticks if you traded a 100 lot and made a tick. See how that is totally crap metric of true performance? P/L can show that information, ticks should be a totally seperate, pure, animal.

Ok, I'll stop.

 
(login for full post details)
  #190 (permalink)
Birmingham, AL
 
 
Posts: 1,065 since Apr 2012


Two trades so far today.

First trade was a short on the breakdown of the opening swing. Stopped for -1.5

Next trade was a re-entry short once we double topped at the ONH. Once we came down to the lower end of the opening swing range, and made the feeble attempt up, it looked pretty tasty. Took a third off at +3 purely because it's the size of a normal rotation. A third off near the ONL and yesterday's VPOC for +4.25. The remainder off shortly thereafter since we'd traded into my main target of yesterday's VPOC and I expected some chop in the area.




Closed Thread

futures io Trading Community Trading Journals > TST Combine Journal


August 28, 2014


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

An Afternoon With futures io member TropicalTrader

Elite only
     



Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts