Overcoming Analysis Paralysis Trading Journal - Trading Journals | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


Overcoming Analysis Paralysis Trading Journal
Updated: Views / Replies:2,205 / 20
Created: by tihfa Attachments:2

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors – all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you don’t need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 2  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

Overcoming Analysis Paralysis Trading Journal

  #11 (permalink)
Elite Member
Miami FL USA
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Ensign 10, NT7 DOM
Broker/Data: IB, IQ
Favorite Futures: Currency Futures
 
Cashish's Avatar
 
Posts: 803 since May 2011
Thanks: 811 given, 2,103 received

@tihfa Your last two posts stimulate interesting thought. I wish I had a nickel for every hour I spent running down rabbit holes searching for what you've described. In an attempt to save you from spending your weekend ferreting out answers to irrelevant questions I suggest you view this futures.io (formerly BMT) Webinar.

Webinar: Denise Shull - Psychological Leverage and Market Mind Games

In your two posts there are several avenues for intense discussion and I'm up for that, but in this webinar I believe Denise identifies many of the limits of our humanity and asks me to consider these limits while searching for answers to problems or issues I may be having with my trading. It may behoove you to spend an hour and twenty minutes contemplating the task at hand and maybe in turn, rethinking the starting point of your journey.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to Cashish for this post:
 
  #12 (permalink)
Elite Member
detroit, mi
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: SPY
 
Posts: 62 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 1,125 given, 65 received

(too) slowly but surely (not so)

well,

thanks cashish for the link. i skimmed through it and i guess there is both benefit and drawback to my mental gymnastics.

the obvious drawback is that i always on instist on understanding "everything" in toto before i do something which means i will never take off and always keep finding excuses and distractions from starting...

i understood long ago that i do not have the psychological makeup for this trading (discretionary and perhaps even mechanic )and plan was to automate the stuff...yet i prefer visual chart scanning hours at a time rather than simply cranking code...go figure..

the positive side to never ending chart reading and playing with myriad of indicators is further understanding of price structure vs setup. the what, why and how. or so i think....

Reply With Quote
 
  #13 (permalink)
Elite Member
detroit, mi
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: SPY
 
Posts: 62 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 1,125 given, 65 received

context


i found this summary off of a thread in 'psychology and money management section':

"Trading successfully using technical analysis based on charts must include a [REASON] to trade (setup/pattern/indicators); a [FRAMEWORK] : support/resistance lines, MAs, pivot levels, Bollinger/Fibb Bands...
And an [EXECUTION] Trigger ( A Strategy based continuation/violation of certain level/thresholds)...Of course last but most important is [MONEY MANAGEMENT] : this must be individually tailored for each setup. Could be $Stops, $Targets, MAs, Supp/Resistance, Swing High/Lows etc...

A reason, framework and money management aka context. If your reason is corrupt, like wanting to win, then you're already on the wrong foot. If you're just taking trades because of red of green arrow appeared you're already on the wrong foot. etc....
"

Reply With Quote
 
  #14 (permalink)
Elite Member
detroit, mi
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: SPY
 
Posts: 62 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 1,125 given, 65 received


tihfa View Post
i found this summary off of a thread in 'psychology and money management section':

"Trading successfully using technical analysis based on charts must include a [REASON] to trade (setup/pattern/indicators); a [FRAMEWORK] : support/resistance lines, MAs, pivot levels, Bollinger/Fibb Bands...
And an [EXECUTION] Trigger ( A Strategy based continuation/violation of certain level/thresholds)...Of course last but most important is [MONEY MANAGEMENT] : this must be individually tailored for each setup. Could be $Stops, $Targets, MAs, Supp/Resistance, Swing High/Lows etc...

A reason, framework and money management aka context. If your reason is corrupt, like wanting to win, then you're already on the wrong foot. If you're just taking trades because of red of green arrow appeared you're already on the wrong foot. etc....
"

above quote summarizes nicely and clarifies what was confusing me....so i am proceeding in this order...

1) define setup "buy lower, sell higher" - pullback
2) define or model price structure => trending channel
3) identify within price structure S/R interfaces => channel boundary
4) execute with particular money management and position management strategy => fixed fractional position sizing, scaling in

similar to above will do for setups "sell higher, buy lower" and "buy high (higher), sell further higher"

Reply With Quote
 
  #15 (permalink)
Elite Member
detroit, mi
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: SPY
 
Posts: 62 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 1,125 given, 65 received

1) setups

have been already coded - basic mean reversion stuff...like rsi or spy is down buy the following day etc...

2) have to finish coding structure aka channels...let's hope it will not be like 2 months to do this...

Reply With Quote
 
  #16 (permalink)
Membership Temporarily Revoked
Birmingham, AL
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra
Broker/Data: several
Favorite Futures: several
 
Posts: 1,065 since Apr 2012
Thanks: 713 given, 2,758 received

How's it coming along?

Reply With Quote
 
  #17 (permalink)
Elite Member
detroit, mi
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: SPY
 
Posts: 62 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 1,125 given, 65 received

too slow, not so sure


indextrader7 View Post
How's it coming along?

It7, thanks for following up.

i;ve finished couple of weeks ago trend definition, rather coded it. (it took much longer than it should have )

it's been taking way to long to code everything. frankly, i am very disapponted with lack of urgency and enthusiasm. so basically want to start manually trading multiday swing/position trading. perhaps this will create some 'positive' excitement.

my goal was to create a supplemental income while changing my career. i have never seen myself doing trading as career. regardless in my case, trading is supposed to be a business, not a hobby or excitement type activity.

in order to accelerate everything i have started getting up early and getting into office couple of hours before everyone else to work on my trading. few hours of intense focused work yields more progress than weeks of inattentive sporadic work.

a lot of analysis and observations made over the months to manage entries, exits cannot directly apply. due to my day job (lots of meetings, phone calls) i cannot utilize more granular charts and lower times frames to confirm and to increase accuracy. this is where automated system would have been handy.

instead i will be going off of daily and weekly signals. just need to get going with some live trading.

challenge right now is position size, money management, trade management. things that i basically never paid much attention before other than everyone on different forums swearing by these being most critical part of trading.

my basic bread and butter type of trade is trend pull back, exploiting relative weakness within a trend. as the signals may appear at different relative weaker price levels i am trying to figure out whether to

1) go all in /all out,
2) all in then reduce position during drawdown /all out,
3) partial initial entry position (size depends on how 'relatively weak' is the price level; then scale in or average in,double up in drawdown (due to mean reverting nature of pullback type trade) /all out.

in every case so far: all out is the exit. Scaling out does not work out mathematically when trying to capture relative weakness to relative strength price movement.

all entry/exit levels have to pre-calculated managed through GTC orders, and nightly adjusted. i am preferring option 3 for my tade management.

hopefully this makes sense. if anyone has any comments or questions please let me know.

regards,
tihfa


Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to tihfa for this post:
 
  #18 (permalink)
Elite Member
detroit, mi
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: SPY
 
Posts: 62 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 1,125 given, 65 received

trading "style" to fit personality

i am learning what was meant by people saying figure out trading "style" that fits personality and/or lifestyle....

most of my analysis has been attempt at perfecting entries, exits...i am recognizing now that if i am not doing automated trading i have to figure out how to swing trade with minimal to no interaction during RTH due to likely job interference.

so perfect stack up/cofluence of multi-time frame goes out of window...

likewise active trade management is out of picture as well so will have to widen my stops and figure out some sort of hedging....don't know anything about options, so that's not helping...

so far based on observations it seems that averaging in during further pullback within a trend is a solution for lack of intraday monitoring. obviously at some level there is a stop to close out all of position if hit or a hedge.

all right, go figure out hedging.....

tihfa

Reply With Quote
 
  #19 (permalink)
Elite Member
detroit, mi
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: SPY
 
Posts: 62 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 1,125 given, 65 received

Common thinking errors that could impact trading

Here are some common thinking errors that impact your trading:

1) Confirmation Bias

The confirmation bias is a tendency to seek information to prove, rather than disprove our theories. The problem arises because often, one piece of false evidence can completely invalidate the otherwise supporting factors.

Consider a study conducted by Peter Cathcart Wason. In the study, Wason showed participants a triplet of numbers (2, 4, 6) and asked them to guess the rule for which the pattern followed. From that, participants could offer test triplets to see if their rule held.

From this starting point, most participants picked specific rules such as “goes up by 2“ or “1x, 2x, 3x.” By only guessing triplets that fit their rule, they didn’t realize the actual rule was “any three ascending numbers.” A simple test triplet of “3, 15, 317“ would have invalidated their theories.

2) Hindsight Bias

Known more commonly under “hindsight is 20/20“ this bias causes people to see past results as appearing more probable than they did initially. This was demonstrated in a study by Paul Lazarsfeld in which he gave participants statements that seemed like common sense. In reality, the opposite of the statements was true.

3) Clustering Illusion

This is the tendency to see patterns where none actually exist. A study conducted by Thomas Gilovich, showed people were easily misled to think patterns existed in random sequences. Although this may be a necessary by product of our ability to detect patterns, it can create problems.

The clustering illusion can result in superstitions and falling for pseudoscience when patterns seem to emerge from entirely random events.

4) Recency Effect

The recency effect is the tendency to give more weight to recent data. Studies have shown participants can more easily remember information at the end of a list than from the middle. The existence of this bias makes it important to gather enough long-term data, so daily up’s and down’s don’t lead to bad decisions.

5) Anchoring Bias

Anchoring is a well-known problem with negotiations. The first person to state a number will usually force the other person to give a new number based on the first. Anchoring happens even when the number is completely random. In one study, participants spun a wheel that either pointed to 15 or 65. They were then asked the number of countries in Africa that belonged to the UN. Even though the number was arbitrary, answers tended to cluster around either 15 or 65.

6) Overconfidence Effect

And you were worried about having too little confidence? Studies have shown that people tend to grossly overestimate their abilities and characteristics from where they should. More than 80% of drivers place themselves in the top 30%.

One study asked participants to answer a difficult question with a range of values to which they were 95% certain the actual answer lay. Despite the fact there was no penalty for extreme uncertainty, less than half of the answers lay within the original margin.

7) Fundamental Attribution Error

Mistaking personality and character traits for differences caused by situations. A classic study demonstrating this had participants rate speakers who were speaking for or against Fidel Castro. Even if the participants were told the position of the speaker was determined by a coin toss, they rated the attitudes of the speaker as being closer to the side they were forced to speak on.

Studies have shown that it is difficult to out-think these cognitive biases. Even when participants in different studies were warned about bias beforehand, this had little impact on their ability to see past them.

What an understanding of biases can do is allow you to design decision making methods and procedures so that biases can be circumvented. Researchers use double-blind studies to prevent bias from contaminating results. Making adjustments to your decision making, problem solving and learning patterns you can try to reduce their effects.

From:
7 Stupid Thinking Errors You Probably Make - Lifehack

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to tihfa for this post:
 
  #20 (permalink)
Elite Member
detroit, mi
 
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: SPY
 
Posts: 62 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 1,125 given, 65 received

Ground Hog Day


well, can't believe its been so long I started the journal, posted few entries and then reverted back to my old habits...

at this point I am basically exhausted and tired of whole analysis, price reading...haven't written anything in my notebook journal last few months...

hopefully what I am trying makes some sense. perhaps someone can point otherwise...

so I have number of basic setups. one of them that can yield a curve like this with about 30-50 trades a year.


Year PF Win %

1/1/2014 0.8 66.67%
1/1/2013 1.01 60.61%
1/1/2012 2.93 61.54%
1/1/2011 1.88 61.11%
1/1/2010 1.38 52.78%
1/1/2009 1.27 61.54%
1/1/2008 1.67 71.43%
1/1/2007 2.04 71.11%
1/1/2006 3.36 70.73%
1/1/2005 1.22 55.17%
1/1/2004 1.2 65.79%
1/1/2003 1.35 63.89%
1/1/2002 1.15 55.88%
1/1/2001 1.32 72.97%
1/1/2000 1.21 56.25%
1/1/1999 1.59 62.16%
1/1/1998 1.6 60.98%
1/1/1997 6.56 33.33%

Attached Thumbnails
Overcoming Analysis Paralysis Trading Journal-equity-curve-1.jpg  
Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > Overcoming Analysis Paralysis Trading Journal

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Jigsaw Trading: TBA

Elite only

FuturesTrader71: TBA

Elite only

NinjaTrader: TBA

Jan 18

RandBots: TBA

Jan 23

GFF Brokers & CME Group: Futures & Bitcoin

Elite only

Adam Grimes: TBA

Elite only

Ran Aroussi: TBA

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
r3algood's Trade Journal: Overcoming Fear in Trading r3algood Trading Journals 5 August 9th, 2012 11:08 PM
Overcoming Sleep Issues goldilocks Off-Topic 22 July 18th, 2012 04:30 AM
Wednesday: Political Paralysis Negative for Markets Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 July 26th, 2011 10:50 PM
AR01 Price Area Journal (Not a trading journal) AR01 Emini Index Futures Trading 69 April 2nd, 2010 09:01 PM
Webinar Trading Video: Live Trading and Technical Analysis of EuroStoxx 50 max-td Trading Reviews and Vendors 1 March 13th, 2010 07:35 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-12-13 in 0.18 seconds with 20 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.163.209.109