Pajot's Trading Journal - futures io
futures io futures trading



Pajot's Trading Journal


Discussion in Trading Journals

Updated by djkiwi
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Pajot with 132 posts (24 thanks)
    2. looks_two aquarian1 with 10 posts (3 thanks)
    3. looks_3 nakachalet with 8 posts (4 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Big Mike with 6 posts (2 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one nakachalet with 0.5 thanks per post
    2. looks_two aquarian1 with 0.3 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Big Mike with 0.3 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Pajot with 0.2 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 12,494 views
    2. thumb_up 37 thanks given
    3. group 8 followers
    1. forum 161 replies
    2. attach_file 119 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Pajot's Trading Journal

(login for full post details)
  #101 (permalink)
Toronto, ON
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB
Trading: ES, CL
 
Posts: 148 since May 2010
Thanks: 13 given, 38 received

Today was not a bad day, as I managed to get back to coding a bit. I cleared 5 items from my ToDo list, including fixing EMA15 and EMA60 plots on the 5min chart, adding a new exception and fine tuning for the orders around the EMA(20).

The code for trading ranges was turned on again, so some of the results are affected. The code is rudimentary at this time and needs my attention as soon as possible. The ATR kept the ATM strategy with an RRR of 4:4 active today, all day.

I have to run replay for the last days for which I have the recorded tick data and will post other charts and results, to cover the latest changes.

Here are the details:




Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Convert H Data TS to NT
NinjaTrader
Market Replay and Fills (Denali data)
Sierra Chart
Historical option expirations
Brokers
Trading Rig Upgrade for Backtesting/Optimization in Multicharts
MultiCharts
Double Smoothed Stochastics Sound & Chart Allerts
The Elite Circle
 
 
(login for full post details)
  #102 (permalink)
Toronto, ON
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB
Trading: ES, CL
 
Posts: 148 since May 2010
Thanks: 13 given, 38 received

With the new code in, the replay did better. It did better than it seems by comparing the PnL at the end of the day, because I started the strategy late in the morning, I avoided the first two losing trades that are there in the replay results (-$58 or so).

I will have to test and re-test the new code, to make sure the new rules are generally applicable, not only today.

Again, I need to revisit the code that says a bar like bar 2 was a strong bull bar. I think the code looks mainly at the tail at the top, less at the body and the bottom tail.

The details:




Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #103 (permalink)
Toronto, ON
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB
Trading: ES, CL
 
Posts: 148 since May 2010
Thanks: 13 given, 38 received


When I realized some of the damage in the -$386 yesterday was caused by the fact that the indicator was sending signals with levels on ES June contract and they were executed on the ES March one, I said I would replay yesterday. The net result is -$2.26 after commissions (well, I already said "net", but I wanted to emphasize how a full day was spent making IB money ).

I remember the first trades yesterday being 6 one point losses, so whatever damage was prevented today is obviously caused by the right contract being used. I hope some more is a result of the extra coding today. It feels good to get back to coding and I have a long list of things to do. I am becoming more enthusiastic about using the volume, above and at ask, below and at bid. I have spent the time writing some basic indicators and it's only an extra step to using them. A bit worried about the IB data feed, but let's see extra edge I get, maybe it will be worth the DTN IQFeed fees.

The details:




Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #104 (permalink)
Toronto, ON
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB
Trading: ES, CL
 
Posts: 148 since May 2010
Thanks: 13 given, 38 received

I like 1407.5-1408 for a bounce from horizontal level. Then 1411 and above for a sloping target.

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #105 (permalink)
Toronto, ON
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB
Trading: ES, CL
 
Posts: 148 since May 2010
Thanks: 13 given, 38 received

And $28.14 in commissions for IB. Working hard for IB here; they should put me on payroll.


Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #106 (permalink)
Toronto, ON
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB
Trading: ES, CL
 
Posts: 148 since May 2010
Thanks: 13 given, 38 received


Pajot View Post
I like 1407.5-1408 for a bounce from horizontal level. Then 1411 and above for a sloping target.


Enjoying the bounce at 1408. It is a melt-up kind of day, so I think they will not allow too much profit on this bounce and it probably moved sideways waiting for the EMA. The sloping target got to around 1415 and maybe another bounce at 1410.5.

I am not upset at all when the bounce is not too big and the fact that it even hesitates and moves horizontally for 10 bars is enough confirmation for this particular calculation. It is about understanding what the market does and why. Even with a few ticks, if I manage to increase the probability of the reads enough, I only need to add contracts in order to scale and grow. Still, part of the learning process...

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #107 (permalink)
Toronto, ON
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB
Trading: ES, CL
 
Posts: 148 since May 2010
Thanks: 13 given, 38 received

I had 4 trades that had 3 ticks profit only to get stopped at break-even before getting the 4th tick. The trading range code got updated over the week-end and does slightly different things. A lot of work to go.




Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #108 (permalink)
Toronto, ON
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB
Trading: ES, CL
 
Posts: 148 since May 2010
Thanks: 13 given, 38 received


Pajot View Post
Enjoying the bounce at 1408. It is a melt-up kind of day, so I think they will not allow too much profit on this bounce and it probably moved sideways waiting for the EMA. The sloping target got to around 1415 and maybe another bounce at 1410.5.

I am not upset at all when the bounce is not too big and the fact that it even hesitates and moves horizontally for 10 bars is enough confirmation for this particular calculation. It is about understanding what the market does and why. Even with a few ticks, if I manage to increase the probability of the reads enough, I only need to add contracts in order to scale and grow. Still, part of the learning process...

1408 was THE bounce, gave some 4 points and no drawdown. It needed to double-top to get some juice on the way to EMA and EMA15min.

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #109 (permalink)
Toronto, ON
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB
Trading: ES, CL
 
Posts: 148 since May 2010
Thanks: 13 given, 38 received

The PnL stayed as in the last post. NT crashed on me, so I couldn't save the chart as it was at the end of the day. I had to run replay. Slightly different trades in replay. One of them is because I forced a chart refresh earlier and the cached orders for the day didn't load properly; the second trade seems to be caused by a speed error. When I run at 50x, some stuff is not loaded fast enough in the strategy, from the indicator or database. For both, I need to investigate and fix.

The trading ranges in the EOD picture, the one from replay, look a bit tighter because I put some code to make the chart cleaner. The change only affects the way I see the chart once the range is invalidated and it would not affect the result. The code for trading ranges is still in its infancy, but I am encouraged by the progress and have a good number of ideas on the long ToDo list.

Here is the chart and it has to be paired with the trades in the previous post for the complete picture of the day.


Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #110 (permalink)
Toronto, ON
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT
Broker: IB
Trading: ES, CL
 
Posts: 148 since May 2010
Thanks: 13 given, 38 received


With the latest changes, I have introduced a couple of bugs that rendered the indicator useless for most of today. That includes debugging and trying stuff, as well. It is better now, I just ran replay and here is the chart and the list of trades. A reason for the larger loss is that I changed the condition for the 1 point scalp from ATR under 2 to ATR under 1.5, opening the door for various ATMs with larger risk and reward.




Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote


futures io Trading Community Trading Journals > Pajot's Trading Journal


April 30, 2012


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

Bookmap

Nov TBD
     



Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts