NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal


Discussion in Trading Journals

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one GFIs1 with 4,733 posts (11,904 thanks)
    2. looks_two Symple with 89 posts (151 thanks)
    3. looks_3 ratfink with 83 posts (146 thanks)
    4. looks_4 CPRICE76 with 74 posts (30 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one GFIs1 with 2.5 thanks per post
    2. looks_two choke35 with 2.5 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 ratfink with 1.8 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Symple with 1.7 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 1,108,444 views
    2. thumb_up 13,620 thanks given
    3. group 260 followers
    1. forum 6,113 posts
    2. attach_file 430 attachments




 
Search this Thread

GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal

  #2191 (permalink)
CPRICE76
LONDON
 
Posts: 93 since Apr 2013
Thanks Given: 110
Thanks Received: 37


GFIs1 View Post
yeah - seems like the steam is out...
Happy holidays @choke35 and all!

GFIs1

I think it just goes to show we cannot look at volume as a reason to trade or not trade, look at today for example relatively low volume but have a nearly 200 points??

As alot of stocks are now traded via algo's/computers there is not so much of the "Summer markets" when most Humans go on holiday as 90% is computer/ALGO based, and computers do not take Holidays!!??

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Exit Strategy
NinjaTrader
New Micros: Ultra 10-Year & Ultra T-Bond -- Live Now
Treasury Notes and Bonds
The space time continuum and the dynamics of a financial …
Emini and Emicro Index
Deepmoney LLM
Elite Quantitative GenAI/LLM
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
59 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
36 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
22 thanks
The Program
20 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
19 thanks
  #2192 (permalink)
 choke35 
Germany
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Other
Trading: ES, YM, 6E
Posts: 2,668 since Feb 2013
Thanks Given: 5,101
Thanks Received: 6,558


CPRICE76 View Post
I think it just goes to show we cannot look at volume as a reason to trade or not trade, look at today for example relatively low volume but have a nearly 200 points??

As alot of stocks are now traded via algo's/computers there is not so much of the "Summer markets" when most Humans go on holiday as 90% is computer/ALGO based, and computers do not take Holidays!!??

Where there is no volume, there are no trades - no matter which method

Taking a look at today's price jumps you will find that they were simply caused by
empty slots in the order book, i.e. a lack of liquidity/market depth.

Reply With Quote
  #2193 (permalink)
CPRICE76
LONDON
 
Posts: 93 since Apr 2013
Thanks Given: 110
Thanks Received: 37



choke35 View Post
@CPRICE76

A sample for your initial question about TPs.
Trades like this show why it is usually a mistake to set TPs
for systems that live and die by momentum.
Miss out on some of these trades or cut them and you cripple
the entire performance.

Well why not have a limit order in anyhow- that may not even get hit? eg take profit if/when the trade is +140 points??

Reply With Quote
  #2194 (permalink)
 choke35 
Germany
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Other
Trading: ES, YM, 6E
Posts: 2,668 since Feb 2013
Thanks Given: 5,101
Thanks Received: 6,558


CPRICE76 View Post
Well why not have a limit order in anyhow- that may not even get hit? eg take profit if/when the trade is +140 points??

The problem is never getting in but getting out; besides, your crystal ball must be much better than mine
if you know that you will get 140p in advance.

With liquidity that dry you simply will not get out without slippage,
esp when you trade large enough to size positions (i.e. no single contract dabbling).

Just make a simple test: Take today's T&S and group the ticks by volume. You will find that most of the day
you would have experienced slippage even with ridiculously low sizes like 2 contracts.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #2195 (permalink)
CPRICE76
LONDON
 
Posts: 93 since Apr 2013
Thanks Given: 110
Thanks Received: 37


choke35 View Post
The problem is never getting in but getting out; besides, your crystal ball must be much better than mine
if you know that you will get 140p in advance.

With liquidity that dry you simply will not get out without slippage,
esp when you trade large enough to size positions (i.e. no single contract dabbling).

Just make a simple test: Take today's T&S and group the ticks by volume. You will find that most of the day
you would have experienced slippage even with ridiculously low sizes like 2 contracts.

Not at all.I dont know would get +140 but I mean is it not worth putting a limit order in for say +140 on the off chance that it will filled? otherwise just leave the exit time order in untill 13:30 CET etc..? ( IF +140 points profit order is hit then great, but if not simply get out at the exit time)

Opinions??

Reply With Quote
  #2196 (permalink)
 choke35 
Germany
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Other
Trading: ES, YM, 6E
Posts: 2,668 since Feb 2013
Thanks Given: 5,101
Thanks Received: 6,558


CPRICE76 View Post
Not at all.I dont know would get +140 but I mean is it not worth putting a limit order in for say +140 on the off chance that it will filled? otherwise just leave the exit time order in untill 13:30 CET etc..? ( IF +140 points profit order is hit then great, but if not simply get out at the exit time)

Opinions??

I for one simply don't like throwing 2-5p (news with even higher values aside) per contract per trade out of the window -
no matter what the target is. So if possible, I change to more liquid instruments or stop trading for that day.
Btw: imo @GFIs1 's low-volume rules also make sense to me ...

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #2197 (permalink)
CPRICE76
LONDON
 
Posts: 93 since Apr 2013
Thanks Given: 110
Thanks Received: 37


choke35 View Post
I for one simply don't like throwing 2-5p (news with even higher values aside) per contract per trade out of the window -
no matter what the target is. So if possible, I change to more liquid instruments or stop trading for that day.
Btw: imo @GFIs1 's low-volume rules also make sense to me ...


Whats 2-5p?? ( points?? ) pS if anything at all if working a order to get filled as a profit target u will be given + slippage, which means the profit target of +140 ( if filled/hit ) could be filled at +145??

Col.

Reply With Quote
  #2198 (permalink)
 choke35 
Germany
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Other
Trading: ES, YM, 6E
Posts: 2,668 since Feb 2013
Thanks Given: 5,101
Thanks Received: 6,558


CPRICE76 View Post
Whats 2-5p?? ( points?? ) pS if anything at all if working a order to get filled as a profit target u will be given + slippage, which means the profit target of +140 ( if filled/hit ) could be filled at +145??

Col.

Theoretically possible, but normally you will throw 2-5p per contract per trade away with slippage against you.
As said: Just test today's T&S for the FDAX. You will find many examples where even low contract sizes caused slippage
of several points.

Reply With Quote
  #2199 (permalink)
CPRICE76
LONDON
 
Posts: 93 since Apr 2013
Thanks Given: 110
Thanks Received: 37


choke35 View Post
Theoretically possible, but normally you will throw 2-5p per contract per trade away with slippage against you.
As said: Just test today's T&S for the FDAX. You will find many examples where even low contract sizes caused slippage
of several points.

So Howcome as far as I am awafe GFIS1 never has slippage issues? as when his stop is -30- He states his stop has been hit and its ALWAYS -30, NEVER -31, -33 etc.. surprised he has never had slippage even if volume is high.Strange.

Reply With Quote
  #2200 (permalink)
 choke35 
Germany
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Other
Trading: ES, YM, 6E
Posts: 2,668 since Feb 2013
Thanks Given: 5,101
Thanks Received: 6,558



CPRICE76 View Post
So Howcome as far as I am awafe GFIS1 never has slippage issues? as when his stop is -30- He states his stop has been hit and its ALWAYS -30, NEVER -31, -33 etc.. surprised he has never had slippage even if volume is high.Strange.

As said: @GFIs1 's low-volume rules make sense: Normally no trades.

"surprised he has never had slippage even if volume is high"???????
Think you still didn't get what slippage is ...

Reply With Quote




Last Updated on March 27, 2024


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts