Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Broker: Advantage Futures, Ninja/TT and InvestorRT/IQFeed.
Trading: Treasury futures
Posts: 312 since Nov 2010
Thanks Given: 194
Thanks Received: 912
Actually, I don't think the CME cares in the least about membership prices, I think they would prefer that the Memberships all go away. There are contractual reasons this is not likely to happen. What this is really about is the CME generating the highest level of clearing fee revenue possible from its order flow consistent with its rules. It stems from the fact that every trader standing in a futures pit had some sort of membership privilege, and was theoretically making all trading decisions and executing trades on his/her own. Order flow generated by nonmembers had a higher priced fee structure. In a HFT situation for sure and possibly in an algo situation, there is quite likely a team effort; nonmembers are involved in the decision making and possibly in the execution process. Under that scenario, the CME is claiming that a different fee structure applies, correctly in my (biased) opinion.
"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows..."
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?