NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Who thinks this is a good strategy?


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Big Mike with 7 posts (1 thanks)
    2. looks_two sefstrat with 3 posts (0 thanks)
    3. looks_3 sam028 with 3 posts (0 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Jugador with 3 posts (1 thanks)
    1. trending_up 14,481 views
    2. thumb_up 6 thanks given
    3. group 11 followers
    1. forum 25 posts
    2. attach_file 15 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Who thinks this is a good strategy?

  #1 (permalink)
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 50,322 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,143
Thanks Received: 101,476

Who thinks this is a good strategy?

Tested against ES. Tested on 1 minute data back to Jan 2007 to Sep 9th 2009 (end of last contract). 1 contract only.

Here is the summary page.



Ok lets see. 800+ trades, 47% win rate, 1.2 profit factor. Win/loss dollar of 1.37. Not bad. But the drawdown is at 20%, pretty high. Although per the equity graph you never actually took much heat, the drawdown from top earnings of 20% is a bit much. Ok lets keep going -- somewhat even number of longs and shorts on the # of trades, but very disproportionate on winners on each side.

Here is the equity curve.



Looks interesting. High volatility areas are showing a jump in profit, and non volatile times are not very good (ie 2007).

Ok, now lets look at a few more graphs. Here is entry and exit efficiency.





Hmm. About 53% avg on entry, but only 43% on exit. Not real great.

Ok lets look over some periods.



The annual report seems a little wonky. We're 3/4 of the way through 2009 yet it's only taken roughly the same number of trades as it did in 2007. 2009 is much, much more volatile, so it's odd it isn't taking a lot more trades - like double the trades -of 2007.

And here is the monthly report:



Uh oh, this is where I stop and look to a new direction. The monthlys don't look good. Very unbalanced. Look at the last 6 months, 130 trades or so yet down over $1,000. Not good. If you can't make money in 130 trades that is bad news.

So another strategy for the shelf. BTW, this one was based on HOD and LOD pivots.

Mike

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list
Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Exclusive money saving offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
My NT8 Volume Profile Split by Asian/Euro/Open
NinjaTrader
Request for MACD with option to use different MAs for fa …
NinjaTrader
NexusFi Journal Challenge - April 2024
Feedback and Announcements
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Retail Trading As An Industry
67 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
47 thanks
Battlestations: Show us your trading desks!
43 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
32 thanks
What percentage per day is possible? [Poll]
31 thanks

  #2 (permalink)
 keepdchange 
California
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninjatrader
Broker: Zen Fire
Trading: ES, Currency Futures (6E)
Posts: 157 since Sep 2009
Thanks Given: 78
Thanks Received: 10

You got it Mike...it is not a very good one. I have a question for you. I have tried to save my account performance page, but the only option I get is to save as "CSV" file. The email option is not working also (I checked with Ninja, they said on some computers emails don't function properly. Anyways, could you tell me how can I save them as an image (just like what you have done here...

Thanks in advance
-Keep

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 50,322 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,143
Thanks Received: 101,476


I use Jing and Snagit. Jing is free. Jing | Add visuals to your online conversations

Mike

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list
Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Exclusive money saving offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Big Mike for this post:
  #4 (permalink)
 
AynRandFan's Avatar
 AynRandFan 
St. Paul, MN.
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Zen-Fire
Trading: ES, equity options.
Posts: 22 since Sep 2009
Thanks Given: 10
Thanks Received: 52

One of my personal "key" metrics is net profit divided by draw-down -- it's an old poker-simulation metric, it certainly isn't original with me. I optimize for minimum draw-down for a whole array of reasons, yet getting a result where net profit is 5 to 7 times your absolute max draw-down during a sim is about the best one can hope for (a few underlying assumptions, here, about tolerable risk levels) -- (poker is different, of course... in poker, the quality of opposing play will skew everything). By the way, my 5-7 times number comes from /ES back-tests that go back 3 months -- I'm still not at at the point of being able to merge data.

The point of my net profit divided by draw-down is essentially that my risk is substantially less than my reward. In other words, finishing up $6K in a 3-month period while never being down more than -$900 is far superior to being up $10K while having suffered a draw-down of -$9K. Anybody who doesn't grasp this would be well-advised to get familiar with the work of Van Tharpe.

Answering any question on whether something is a "good investment" pre-supposes an answer to another question, and that question, of course, is the old Warren Buffett saw, "...well, compared to what?"

I'm assuming here, Mike, that you've got better strats in your personal toolbox -- all investments need to be viewed within a context of alternatives. The answer to your question depends entirely upon what other strats you have.

I feel pretty confident saying that I can beat your 11-quarter strategy in 6 months or so, and extremely confident in saying that I can beat it over a 9 month period. I also feel pretty confident in saying that you probably have me thumped by a significant degree -- I'm relatively new with NinjaTrader -- your head-start over me is massive.

It all comes down to one's decision-making process, in any case.

Ultimately, we're all competing against the risk-free rate, which is generally the 10-year Treasury (although many institutions use the 30-year -- either is fine, and sophisticated fund managers have solid arguments for either of them). Any of us can grab the risk-free rate at any time, of course, simply by buying Treasuries -- the point of taking risk is obtaining a higher reward.

In other words, your first task is to beat the risk-free rate.

Don't laugh: Lehman couldn't do it, Merrill couldn't do it, Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac couldn't do it, and today's news makes it pretty clear that Salomon wasn't doing it, either.

I'm not trying to be a smart-ass here, by the way.

The game is far trickier than almost everybody thinks.

Beating the risk-free rate is far harder than almost anybody knows -- in fact, let me say this: only one man in ten thousand has any idea that the task itself is almost -- not quite, but almost -- impossible.

Reply With Quote
The following 4 users say Thank You to AynRandFan for this post:
  #5 (permalink)
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 50,322 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,143
Thanks Received: 101,476

ARF, (can I call you arf? lol)

Have you programmed your optimization into a Type so you can actually optimize against it, or are you dumping to Excel and doing it manually? You should consider making it a Type. There are some other good optimizer types on the forum, I like the SQN method personally but have written several custom types that weigh my personal favorites in my own formulas.

Yes this strategy is no good, wasn't trying to say otherwise. You should know I write about 20 strategies a week and just tinker and play with them over time, ever-evolving. I have some that are real nice, and some that suck ass. But I constantly wrestle with curve fitting. I've seen strategies that trade 1,000 times be curve fitted more than you could believe. I have several threads on curve fitting.

Nice post, btw.

Mike

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list
Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Exclusive money saving offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)
 
sefstrat's Avatar
 sefstrat 
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NT/Matlab
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: FX majors
Posts: 285 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 20
Thanks Received: 768

RandFan, I think you are neglecting to consider the effects of leverage (which you usually don't get on a risk free investment, unless you count statistical arbitrage)

I think it is rather easy to beat the risk free rate using leverage and discretionary trading if you have patience to wait for good setups. Of course, you can easily drain yourself using leverage if you are inexperienced, impatient, trading noise, etc..

Automated trading is much more difficult, but nowhere near impossible. The same rules apply pretty much, good money management, only take high probability setups, etc. The hardest part getting started is defining when not to trade.


Mike, regarding the strategy in question, the equity curve doesn't look very good to me. I would shoot for a more linear curve. Linear curve implies stability, you can't be sure that the conditions which caused the few really big winners in that equity curve will occur again any time soon.

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)
 
sam028's Avatar
 sam028 
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 3,761 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 3,824
Thanks Received: 4,629

How about this one ?

Only a 3 months backtest, I don't have all my data here, just to play with Snagit .

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	29-09-2009 12-35-09.png
Views:	262
Size:	92.0 KB
ID:	2852   Click image for larger version

Name:	29-09-2009 12-36-39.png
Views:	242
Size:	98.4 KB
ID:	2853  
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)
Jugador
USA
 
Posts: 162 since Jul 2009
Thanks Given: 67
Thanks Received: 51

Mike...are you trading the same # of contracts every time? I couldn't really tell from the screenies. Anyway, if you are, have you tried some sort of position sizing strategy? The reason I ask is I noticed on Ensigns site that the owner (Howard) had given his subscribers a trading method. Here's the results I get from 09-23-09. The first result is 2 contracts (ES) for every trade, The 2nd result is the same method with a pyramiding position sizing strategy, As you can see, it can make a hell of a difference.

(The reason the time stamps aren't exactly the same is because the templates don't both start at exactly the same time. I'm not a programmer, so I don't know how to fix it.)

But, the method for entry and exit is the same for both results, and of course the same day. Anyway, I don't know if you can do that with NInja, but if you can, you might get some interesting results.

Here's a link to Howards web page if you want to read it. Pyramiding A Position

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	loser.png
Views:	238
Size:	32.0 KB
ID:	2872   Click image for larger version

Name:	winner.png
Views:	209
Size:	33.1 KB
ID:	2873  
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)
 
Poocher's Avatar
 Poocher 
Los Angeles
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: SC, MT,
Broker: Forex
Trading: Forex
Posts: 302 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 362
Thanks Received: 109

Is there a moderator on this thread?

We got someone calling the beautiful AynRandFan...ARF...oh the nerve!

Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)
 
sefstrat's Avatar
 sefstrat 
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NT/Matlab
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: FX majors
Posts: 285 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 20
Thanks Received: 768


Wow, that Ensign guy is either completely naive or really malicious.

Usually when people discuss pyramiding with respect to MM they refer to profit pyramiding (also known as anti-martingale) where you are more risky with your profits, adding to your winning positions or increasing position size after a winning trade. This can be very powerful if you design your strategy around it.

What this bozo is recommending is loss pyramiding or martingale strategy where you increase position size after every losing trade, this is a very well documented way to blow up your account (unless you have infinite money, in that case it is the perfect strategy).


Jugador View Post
Mike...are you trading the same # of contracts every time? I couldn't really tell from the screenies. Anyway, if you are, have you tried some sort of position sizing strategy? The reason I ask is I noticed on Ensigns site that the owner (Howard) had given his subscribers a trading method. Here's the results I get from 09-23-09. The first result is 2 contracts (ES) for every trade, The 2nd result is the same method with a pyramiding position sizing strategy, As you can see, it can make a hell of a difference.

(The reason the time stamps aren't exactly the same is because the templates don't both start at exactly the same time. I'm not a programmer, so I don't know how to fix it.)

But, the method for entry and exit is the same for both results, and of course the same day. Anyway, I don't know if you can do that with NInja, but if you can, you might get some interesting results.

Here's a link to Howards web page if you want to read it. Pyramiding A Position


Reply With Quote





Last Updated on November 9, 2009


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts