The Big Mike Challenge #2 starts in June and is about Teaching Trading Methods. If you wish to participate, please read the above link.
The prize is an iPad 2.
Due to time constraints, please do not PM me if your question can be resolved or answered on the forum.
Need help? 1) Stop changing things. No new indicators, charts, or methods. Be consistent with what is in front of you first. 2) Start a journal and post to it daily with the trades you made to show your strengths and weaknesses. 3) Set goals for yourself to reach daily. Make them about how you trade, not how much money you make. 4) Accept responsibility for your actions. Stop looking elsewhere to explain away poor performance. 5) Where to start as a trader? Watch this webinar and read this thread for hundreds of questions and answers. 6) Help using the forum? Watch this video to learn general tips on using the site.
If you want to support our community, become an Elite Member.
TPO tests can keep you on the right side of the market
I have been pouring over the VSA method as I listen to Tom Williams explain VSA. An element that appears to be missing is the first hour TPO initial balance range in a market (not taught by VSA, of course) and extended ranges. The benefit of simply adding that to your VSA charts is points to areas of value or likely turning points in the market. Therefore, lining a TPO's VAH, VAL and its corresponding fibo extension ranges of 127.2 and the 161.8. Better still, chart a Developing VWAP (DVWAP) in real time together with a VSA. I have noticed that especially at the 127.2 and 161.8 extensions one will see a high volume node presenting a possible shakeout. Of course, wait for VSA tading confirmation before taking a trade because it may be a trending market that simply continues with the trend (i.e. Triple Trending Day)! I found a few examples on the web - High Probability Fibonacci Trades
The following user says Thank You to COTtrader for this post:
I think that the more lines you add on a chart the more you increase the risk to lower the efficiency of your method. Here is a controversial article about Fibonacci levels that talk about Fib levels in a more persuavive way: