NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Need Help: Urgent Broker Problem (Phillip Capital: NT Brokerage, Edge Clear)


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Big Mike with 22 posts (61 thanks)
    2. looks_two AvgTraderJoe with 21 posts (20 thanks)
    3. looks_3 SMCJB with 20 posts (45 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Salao with 17 posts (32 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one NinjaTrader with 3.7 thanks per post
    2. looks_two NT Brokerage with 3.6 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Big Mike with 2.8 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 SMCJB with 2.3 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 49,115 views
    2. thumb_up 505 thanks given
    3. group 467 followers
    1. forum 309 posts
    2. attach_file 6 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Need Help: Urgent Broker Problem (Phillip Capital: NT Brokerage, Edge Clear)

  #301 (permalink)
 Arch 
W.Coast, USA.
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Anything
Trading: Emini
Posts: 347 since Jul 2017
Thanks Given: 106
Thanks Received: 381

Slightly offtopic question: are these rare issues becoming more common in 2020 and 2021? What is the cause, if yes?

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
Cheap historycal L1 data for stocks
Stocks and ETFs
REcommedations for programming help
Sierra Chart
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
What broker to use for trading palladium futures
Commodities
 
  #302 (permalink)
 
SMCJB's Avatar
 SMCJB 
Houston TX
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TT and Stellar
Broker: Advantage Futures
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,049 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,388
Thanks Received: 10,207


Arch View Post
Slightly offtopic question: are these rare issues becoming more common in 2020 and 2021? What is the cause, if yes?

Can't speak definitively on this, but if we consider TTs older XTrader it was a distributive system. If a gateway failed it only affected the people attached to that specific gateway. New/Cloud TT though is centralized, everybody is connecting using the same core connections. If TT have an infrastructure problem, or push out bad code, it now affects everybody. I suspect this centralization is creating single point of failure issues that didn't exist before. The price of progress!

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #303 (permalink)
 
Schnook's Avatar
 Schnook 
Munich, Germany
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra Chart
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: liquid products
Posts: 570 since Jul 2016
Thanks Given: 1,166
Thanks Received: 1,917



Arch View Post
Slightly offtopic question: are these rare issues becoming more common in 2020 and 2021? What is the cause, if yes?

Yes. Complex systems are inherently fragile, and becoming increasingly complex, interdependent, and thus more vulnerable by the day.

If you have a futures trading account with a discount brokerage firm, consider opening another account with a larger brokerage, preferably a very well capitalized firm with very robust technological resources. This way your trading capital will be spread out a bit and you will be less likely to be locked out of the markets should something go wrong.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #304 (permalink)
 
TraderMich's Avatar
 TraderMich 
Copenhagen + Denmark
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra Chart
Broker: Broker: Trade Future 4 Less. Data Feed/Order routing: CQG
Trading: DAX; ES; Bund Futures
Posts: 77 since Oct 2018
Thanks Given: 49
Thanks Received: 57


SMCJB View Post
Everybody is dependent upon somebody for data! In the old XTrader TT model, FCM's had their own data gateways, so in that sense they were dependent upon themselves for data. I believe most brokers have multiple platform and multiple data providers. Not sure there is a universal list.

CQG are a data and software provider they are not a broker or FCM. Hence CQG do not set margin requirements. While the messaging may be coming to you through CQG in this case the margin requirement is being set by 'Trade Future 4 Less' or more likely Dorman. Somebody else using CQG through different brokers will have different margin requirements.

SMCJM - I basically agree with you, but if CQG are not involved with the margins/intraday margins why would they issiu a message like the one, posted by Comeback King yesterday:

CQG - Order Routing Problems - Continues



CQG just provided update (Below) - we are starting our Emergency Actions.
We will begin closing any positions on accounts that do NOT have the 100% Exchange Margin Requirement to carry the position.
> If we close an open position, we will disable trading, so you do not close an Open position showing on CQG > that we already closed on the Exchange.
> If you are not using Compound Orders (per CQG notice below) - your orders and positions should NOT be affected and you can close any open positions you feel are accurate.

Reply With Quote
  #305 (permalink)
 
Schnook's Avatar
 Schnook 
Munich, Germany
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra Chart
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: liquid products
Posts: 570 since Jul 2016
Thanks Given: 1,166
Thanks Received: 1,917


TraderMich View Post
SMCJM - I basically agree with you, but if CQG are not involved with the margins/intraday margins why would they issiu a message like the one, posted by Comeback King yesterday:

CQG - Order Routing Problems - Continues



CQG just provided update (Below) - we are starting our Emergency Actions.
We will begin closing any positions on accounts that do NOT have the 100% Exchange Margin Requirement to carry the position.
> If we close an open position, we will disable trading, so you do not close an Open position showing on CQG > that we already closed on the Exchange.
> If you are not using Compound Orders (per CQG notice below) - your orders and positions should NOT be affected and you can close any open positions you feel are accurate.

The "we" in the above is not CQG but the FCM. Certain discount brokers offer clients reduced margins, but with the issues CQG was having yesterday, the broker in question decided to play it safe and demand full margins.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #306 (permalink)
 
bobwest's Avatar
 bobwest 
Western Florida
Site Moderator
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra Chart
Trading: ES, YM
Frequency: Several times daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 8,172 since Jan 2013
Thanks Given: 57,513
Thanks Received: 26,292


TraderMich View Post
SMCJM - I basically agree with you, but if CQG are not involved with the margins/intraday margins why would they issiu a message like the one, posted by Comeback King yesterday:

CQG - Order Routing Problems - Continues



CQG just provided update (Below) - we are starting our Emergency Actions.
We will begin closing any positions on accounts that do NOT have the 100% Exchange Margin Requirement to carry the position.
> If we close an open position, we will disable trading, so you do not close an Open position showing on CQG > that we already closed on the Exchange.
> If you are not using Compound Orders (per CQG notice below) - your orders and positions should NOT be affected and you can close any open positions you feel are accurate.

@TraderMich, the message you quoted was not issued by CQG, but by @Comeback King's broker, which was notifying their customers that they (the broker) would take this action based on the margin in the customers' accounts.

The broker was moving to protect itself, that's all. It could have a liability issue with its clearing broker if there were large losses by its customers. It would prefer not to be holding the bag for undercapitalized trades.

Bob.

When one door closes, another opens.
-- Cervantes, Don Quixote
Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #307 (permalink)
 
SMCJB's Avatar
 SMCJB 
Houston TX
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TT and Stellar
Broker: Advantage Futures
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,049 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,388
Thanks Received: 10,207

Thank You @Schnook and @bobwest

@TraderMich I don't have a horse in the race here. I'm just trying to help improve the information flow and try and let people understand that what 'who' they think is the problem, may not have anything to do with the problem at all.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #308 (permalink)
 
TraderMich's Avatar
 TraderMich 
Copenhagen + Denmark
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra Chart
Broker: Broker: Trade Future 4 Less. Data Feed/Order routing: CQG
Trading: DAX; ES; Bund Futures
Posts: 77 since Oct 2018
Thanks Given: 49
Thanks Received: 57


SMCJB View Post
Thank You @Schnook and @bobwest

@TraderMich I don't have a horse in the race here. I'm just trying to help improve the information flow and try and let people understand that what 'who' they think is the problem, may not have anything to do with the problem at all.

Yes SMCJB I understand you good intensions and appreciate very highly that you explain the infrastructure, and are very active and a resource in this forum, thank you.

I think the confusion from my side is that the the FCM's are deciding the Intraday margin but the order routing companies (in this case CQG) are "setting" the margins in their own system based on the FCM rules. - In this case CQG are both data provider and facilitating the order routing from the trader to the exchange. But in other cases the data and routing can be separated in to two independent entities.

Again my intensions was not to start a discussion with you as I appreciate you knowledge and that you are active here and helping us all.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #309 (permalink)
 
TraderMich's Avatar
 TraderMich 
Copenhagen + Denmark
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra Chart
Broker: Broker: Trade Future 4 Less. Data Feed/Order routing: CQG
Trading: DAX; ES; Bund Futures
Posts: 77 since Oct 2018
Thanks Given: 49
Thanks Received: 57


Schnook View Post
The "we" in the above is not CQG but the FCM. Certain discount brokers offer clients reduced margins, but with the issues CQG was having yesterday, the broker in question decided to play it safe and demand full margins.

Schnook Thank you very much for the clarification on this - Highly appreciated - I see and understand you point.

Danke vielmals

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #310 (permalink)
 
TraderMich's Avatar
 TraderMich 
Copenhagen + Denmark
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra Chart
Broker: Broker: Trade Future 4 Less. Data Feed/Order routing: CQG
Trading: DAX; ES; Bund Futures
Posts: 77 since Oct 2018
Thanks Given: 49
Thanks Received: 57



bobwest View Post
@TraderMich, the message you quoted was not issued by CQG, but by @Comeback King's broker, which was notifying their customers that they (the broker) would take this action based on the margin in the customers' accounts.

The broker was moving to protect itself, that's all. It could have a liability issue with its clearing broker if there were large losses by its customers. It would prefer not to be holding the bag for undercapitalized trades.

Bob.

BOBWEST - Thank you very much - Point taken - Thanks for the clarification.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on March 18, 2021


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts