NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





The question of an edge


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one kevinkdog with 8 posts (50 thanks)
    2. looks_two Grantx with 6 posts (14 thanks)
    3. looks_3 ratfink with 5 posts (24 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Johno1 with 3 posts (5 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one kevinkdog with 6.3 thanks per post
    2. looks_two rleplae with 5 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 ratfink with 4.8 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Grantx with 2.3 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 18,441 views
    2. thumb_up 150 thanks given
    3. group 13 followers
    1. forum 40 posts
    2. attach_file 2 attachments




 
Search this Thread

The question of an edge

  #1 (permalink)
 Grantx 
Reading UK
Legendary no drama Llama
 
Experience: None
Posts: 1,787 since Oct 2016
Thanks Given: 2,826
Thanks Received: 5,058

Dude: I want to try this new strategy on this instrument what do ya-all think?
Trader: Whats your statistical back tested edge?
Dude: .............


How do you reduce something so complex down to a single question like that and expect an answer? Most times it can take an entire journal and we still wont know what a traders edge is.

Can it be reduced down to a mere statistic?
Can it be based any one of the following things?
1. superior money management?
2. Iron clad discipline?
3. Phsychology?
4. Journaling and record keeping?
5. Accomplished technical ability?
6. Profoundly deep understanding of fundamentals?
7. Gigabyes of back tested data?
8. Reams of forward tested data?
9. Thousands of hours of screen time?
I can go on...


You might think that your edge is your ability to execute this one thing repeatedly which your spreadsheet tells you statistically works out in your favour 55% of the time (or whatever). If it is that simple then why cant someone else take your strategy and trade it because we all know that doesnt work?
Your edge is the sum total of everything you have been through on your journey to become a trader. Everything I have listed is important and is an edge in itself. Backtested statistical data is just one piece of it.

What do you think?

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
My NT8 Volume Profile Split by Asian/Euro/Open
NinjaTrader
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
Are there any eval firms that allow you to sink to your …
Traders Hideout
The space time continuum and the dynamics of a financial …
Emini and Emicro Index
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
61 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
38 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
27 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
18 thanks
The Program
18 thanks
  #3 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,646 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,890
Thanks Received: 7,338



Grantx View Post
Dude: I want to try this new strategy on this instrument what do ya-all think?
Trader: Whats your statistical back tested edge?
Dude: .............


How do you reduce something so complex down to a single question like that and expect an answer? Most times it can take an entire journal and we still wont know what a traders edge is.

Can it be reduced down to a mere statistic?

Yes, it is called expectancy.

If you don't have positive expectancy, many of the other things on your list (iron clad discipline, superior money management, thousands of hours of screen time, journaling, etc) become irrelevant.

But, if you do have a positive expectancy edge, many of those items you listed DO become important. Example: with poor money management, you can easily get wiped out even with a positive expectancy system.

It all starts with positive expectancy - if you lack that, you will eventually be screwed.

Think of it like building a castle. You need a solid foundation (Positive expectancy) before building the castle (other items in your list). Because as Jimi Hendrix said "castles made of sand, fall in the sea, eventually."

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)
drm7
Virginia
 
Posts: 49 since Oct 2010
Thanks Given: 192
Thanks Received: 47

This is an interesting topic, as I have wrestled with these issues for a long time. I would pose two related questions that try to get at the heart of the matter:
  1. Is a trading strategy only valid if it can be coded and run by a computer? (Assume the coder is highly competent)
  2. Can a purely discretionary strategy truly have an "edge?" (If it does, see question #1).

One "out" that the discretionary traders always take is "context." i.e., "I would take THIS entry, but not THAT (identical-looking) entry b/c the "bad" entry is too close to resistance." Mack from PATS is big on context, but appears to be successful. Same with Bob Volman, Al Brooks, Sam Seiden, etc.

Assuming pure discretionary price action type methods have an "edge," is there 1,000 (or 10,000) lines of computer code that could encapsulate all of the "context" and exceptions to the rule that would verify the edge?

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #5 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,646 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,890
Thanks Received: 7,338


drm7 View Post
This is an interesting topic, as I have wrestled with these issues for a long time. I would pose two related questions that try to get at the heart of the matter:
  1. Is a trading strategy only valid if it can be coded and run by a computer? (Assume the coder is highly competent)
  2. Can a purely discretionary strategy truly have an "edge?" (If it does, see question #1).

One "out" that the discretionary traders always take is "context." i.e., "I would take THIS entry, but not THAT (identical-looking) entry b/c the "bad" entry is too close to resistance." Mack from PATS is big on context, but appears to be successful. Same with Bob Volman, Al Brooks, Sam Seiden, etc.

Assuming pure discretionary price action type methods have an "edge," is there 1,000 (or 10,000) lines of computer code that could encapsulate all of the "context" and exceptions to the rule that would verify the edge?

1. no
2. yes


Discretionary traders can indeed have positive expectancy. The approach might be impossible to backtest, though.

Regardless of trading style, you can always use actual real money results to determine expectancy/edge.

Some methods cannot be backtested, and backtests can easily be faked/manipulated/etc. Backtests are definitely not foolproof.

As for your list of discretionary traders, I have my doubts about some of them having an edge (or even trading at all), and I'll leave it at that.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)
 Grantx 
Reading UK
Legendary no drama Llama
 
Experience: None
Posts: 1,787 since Oct 2016
Thanks Given: 2,826
Thanks Received: 5,058


kevinkdog View Post
Yes, it is called expectancy.

If you don't have positive expectancy, many of the other things on your list (iron clad discipline, superior money management, thousands of hours of screen time, journaling, etc) become irrelevant.

But, if you do have a positive expectancy edge, many of those items you listed DO become important. Example: with poor money management, you can easily get wiped out even with a positive expectancy system.

It all starts with positive expectancy - if you lack that, you will eventually be screwed.

Think of it like building a castle. You need a solid foundation (Positive expectancy) before building the castle (other items in your list). Because as Jimi Hendrix said "castles made of sand, fall in the sea, eventually."

Positive expectancy is the sum of the parts and fluctuates along in direct response to the input. Its a representation of how disciplined you are with all the points listed (and others).

Firstly, to ask the question 'what do you think of this or that strategy' is a silly thing to ask in the first place. But equally baffling is to ask whats your edge or do you have a positive expectancy? Edge and expectancy is only relevant right now, because these metrics can change. You cant rely on your expectancy for anything. Or can you? What do you do with it?

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #7 (permalink)
 
rleplae's Avatar
 rleplae 
Gits (Hooglede) Belgium
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Master
Platform: NinjaTrader, Proprietary,
Broker: Ninjabrokerage/IQfeed + Synthetic datafeed
Trading: 6A, 6B, 6C, 6E, 6J, 6S, ES, NQ, YM, AEX, CL, NG, ZB, ZN, ZC, ZS, GC
Posts: 3,003 since Sep 2013
Thanks Given: 2,442
Thanks Received: 5,863


kevinkdog View Post
1. no
2. yes


Discretionary traders can indeed have positive expectancy. The approach might be impossible to backtest, though.

Regardless of trading style, you can always use actual real money results to determine expectancy/edge.

Some methods cannot be backtested, and backtests can easily be faked/manipulated/etc. Backtests are definitely not foolproof.

As for your list of discretionary traders, I have my doubts about some of them having an edge (or even trading at all), and I'll leave it at that.

I Agree...
I can even say more..

There can be an 'edge', which by eye-balling the screen is very clear, why long, why short, why don't touch
once you want to quantify it (at least in classic rule-based system) and program it, it becomes very very
difficult as there is always a little 'but', which is evident to the human eye/brain, but when not programmed
it doesn't count...

Today half of my strategies are classic rule based, if / then and work OK
other half are machine learning, artificial intelligence based

I'm currently working on a small new project, and teach my kid (university student) the magic of machine
learning. as a example i hope to illustrate the result of a rules based system compared to a machine learning
system. But on the same concept... The goal of the exercise is : manual, trial/error/optimisation of features
and parameters, compared to automatic feature extraction... will be a good interesting exercise

More to follow this month...

Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)
 
ratfink's Avatar
 ratfink 
Birmingham UK
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: TST/Rithmic
Trading: YM/Gold
Posts: 3,633 since Dec 2012
Thanks Given: 17,423
Thanks Received: 8,425


rleplae View Post
There can be an 'edge', which by eye-balling the screen is very clear, why long, why short, why don't touch
once you want to quantify it (at least in classic rule-based system) and program it, it becomes very very
difficult as there is always a little 'but', which is evident to the human eye/brain, but when not programmed
it doesn't count...

Today half of my strategies are classic rule based, if / then and work OK
other half are machine learning, artificial intelligence based

I'm currently working on a small new project, and teach my kid (university student) the magic of machine
learning. as a example i hope to illustrate the result of a rules based system compared to a machine learning
system. But on the same concept... The goal of the exercise is : manual, trial/error/optimisation of features
and parameters, compared to automatic feature extraction... will be a good interesting exercise

More to follow this month...

Like the sound of the project, have a similar plan in incubation, good hunting.

However, regarding 'the edge' I'm afraid 90% is illusion caused by the magic of whole charts and hindsight, there is only 'the right-hand edge' when we're live...

Cheers

Travel Well
Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #9 (permalink)
 kevinkdog   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 3,646 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 1,890
Thanks Received: 7,338


Grantx View Post
Positive expectancy is the sum of the parts and fluctuates along in direct response to the input. Its a representation of how disciplined you are with all the points listed (and others).

Firstly, to ask the question 'what do you think of this or that strategy' is a silly thing to ask in the first place. But equally baffling is to ask whats your edge or do you have a positive expectancy? Edge and expectancy is only relevant right now, because these metrics can change. You cant rely on your expectancy for anything. Or can you? What do you do with it?


I'm unsure how to answer your questions, but I will share this:

1. Any hedge fund or Commodity Trading Advisor will always ask you what you think your edge is, if they want you to trade with them

2. Just because you have an edge the last week/month/year/decade does not guarantee you'll have one the next week/month/year/decade

3. If you do not know what your edge is, chances are you probably do not even have one

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)
 
TheShrike's Avatar
 TheShrike 
Bridgeport, Ct
 
Experience: None
Broker: Tasty
Trading: Fops
Posts: 533 since Jun 2012
Thanks Given: 1,588
Thanks Received: 922



Grantx View Post
Positive expectancy is the sum of the parts and fluctuates along in direct response to the input. Its a representation of how disciplined you are with all the points listed (and others).

Firstly, to ask the question 'what do you think of this or that strategy' is a silly thing to ask in the first place. But equally baffling is to ask whats your edge or do you have a positive expectancy? Edge and expectancy is only relevant right now, because these metrics can change. You cant rely on your expectancy for anything. Or can you? What do you do with it?

I'm sorry, but you're wrong. You can't conjure profit through positive thoughts, writing in a journal, screen time or discipline in financial markets. If what you are doing is mathematically unsound you will lose. Those things you listed are prerequisite to success and may help you adjust yourself to attaining an edge. By themselves they do not equal one. You must have a positive mathematical expectancy. Everything else is secondary.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on July 17, 2017


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts