NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





finding the minimum of an equation


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one artemiso with 3 posts (5 thanks)
    2. looks_two adamov with 3 posts (1 thanks)
    3. looks_3 tulanch with 2 posts (2 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Fat Tails with 2 posts (4 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Fat Tails with 2 thanks per post
    2. looks_two artemiso with 1.7 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 tulanch with 1 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 adamov with 0.3 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 6,925 views
    2. thumb_up 13 thanks given
    3. group 5 followers
    1. forum 12 posts
    2. attach_file 3 attachments




 
Search this Thread

finding the minimum of an equation

  #11 (permalink)
 tulanch 
Salt Lake City, UT
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: SC, NT, MT
Broker: AMP
Trading: NQ ES YM Bonds
Posts: 265 since Mar 2010
Thanks Given: 50
Thanks Received: 387


adamov View Post
Thank you for all the inputs.

So after differentiating I got this:


This is what I should solve to 0

I looked into this Newton-Raphson method, its really interesting and could provide a really good approximation of root this function in a couple of steps but I should differentiate this again, and it makes it way too complicated.
only the first part looked like this:



wouldn’t be more efficient just increasing/decreasing the value of x in a cycle In the original equation until the value of y won’t get any smaller?
Whole numbers are fine for me, I don’t need any decimals.



doen't that equate out to 100?

16+22+25+22+11+4=100

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
PowerLanguage & EasyLanguage. How to get the platfor …
EasyLanguage Programming
REcommedations for programming help
Sierra Chart
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
How to apply profiles
Traders Hideout
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
31 thanks
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
28 thanks
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
24 thanks
Bigger Wins or Fewer Losses?
20 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
17 thanks
  #12 (permalink)
 
rleplae's Avatar
 rleplae 
Gits (Hooglede) Belgium
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Master
Platform: NinjaTrader, Proprietary,
Broker: Ninjabrokerage/IQfeed + Synthetic datafeed
Trading: 6A, 6B, 6C, 6E, 6J, 6S, ES, NQ, YM, AEX, CL, NG, ZB, ZN, ZC, ZS, GC
Posts: 3,003 since Sep 2013
Thanks Given: 2,442
Thanks Received: 5,863


tulanch View Post
doen't that equate out to 100?

16+22+25+22+11+4=100

NO, it does not
you are missing the absolute value

Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)
 
Fat Tails's Avatar
 Fat Tails 
Berlin, Europe
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, MultiCharts
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Keyboard
Posts: 9,888 since Mar 2010
Thanks Given: 4,242
Thanks Received: 27,102



tulanch View Post
doen't that equate out to 100?

16+22+25+22+11+4=100


And remember that Newton-Raphson can only be applied to a differentiable function, and well - this one is not differentiable.

Reply With Quote




Last Updated on March 22, 2017


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts