Drawdown Monte Carlo Increase over time PROBLEM - Traders Hideout | futures.io
futures.io futures trading


Drawdown Monte Carlo Increase over time PROBLEM
Started: by Loop Views / Replies:445 / 11
Last Reply: Attachments:0

Welcome to futures.io.

Welcome, Guest!

This forum was established to help traders (especially futures traders) by openly sharing indicators, strategies, methods, trading journals and discussing the psychology of trading.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading forums:
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive on our forums.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendor advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in openness and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, it is not something tangible you can download.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.


You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free and simple, and we will never resell your private information.

-- Big Mike

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

Drawdown Monte Carlo Increase over time PROBLEM

  #11 (permalink)
Elite Member
Sydney
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Multichart
Favorite Futures: Gold
 
Posts: 26 since Aug 2016
Thanks: 22 given, 4 received

MC

For example, I'll put in my 100 trades that took place over a month's time, and let it run over 10,000 simulations. That's,

...
The purpose of the MC simulation is to see possible outcomes and Drawdowns given that the future of your system follows the same cumulative frequency distribution your past trades has. It means that your system has to be stationary in a mathematical sense.

A first step after back testing is to do forward walking testing and do same MC on this. Then you can use real trades and see if the system is broken and should be stopped.

Its all math analysis of the system you use.

If you change system or break its rules any MC analysis is of course meaningless.

All very well explain in Howard Bandys books!!

Loop

Reply With Quote
 
  #12 (permalink)
Elite Member
seoul, Korea
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Multicharts
Broker/Data: CQG, DTN IQfeed
Favorite Futures: YM 6E
 
treydog999's Avatar
 
Posts: 883 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 289 given, 996 received


Loop View Post
For example, I'll put in my 100 trades that took place over a month's time, and let it run over 10,000 simulations. That's,

...
The purpose of the MC simulation is to see possible outcomes and Drawdowns given that the future of your system follows the same cumulative frequency distribution your past trades has. It means that your system has to be stationary in a mathematical sense.

A first step after back testing is to do forward walking testing and do same MC on this. Then you can use real trades and see if the system is broken and should be stopped.

Its all math analysis of the system you use.

If you change system or break its rules any MC analysis is of course meaningless.

All very well explain in Howard Bandys books!!

Loop


Let me have a crack at this question both the OP talking about draw downs growing at a rate of SQRT(N) and then Monte Carlo methods and stationary of the series.

First off if draw downs grow at a rate of sqrt(N) then all HFTs would be bankrupt by now because they would execute millions of trades in which case they would easily approach ruin, sqrt(N) actually accelerates pretty fast so these firms would have blown up within a matter of days. As we can disprove it with this single counter factual, draw downs do not model in this way.

Monte Carlo is not used to see if a time series is stationary, you would use Augmented Dickey Fuller or Engel Grainger 2 step. MC is a method that allows you to resample/boot strap a larger distribution given a limited number of samples, this will allow you to hopefully approach the true distribution of which your samples come from and get better confidence intervals. However garbage in / garbage out, if your trade samples do not come from the true distribution, you can sample it all you want and the answers are meaningless.

You can use several methods to determine if a system should be stopped. Although I am an advocate of MC, it is not how i determine if my system should be stopped. The MC may help me generate the CI's or medians, but I use statistical process control methods for the actual monitoring and alerts.

Reply With Quote

Reply



futures.io > > > Drawdown Monte Carlo Increase over time PROBLEM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

2016 True Edge Awards: Voting is open until Jan 21!

Now
 

Bookmap New Indicator Panel, Cumulative Delta, Order Flow demo

Jan 17
 

An Afternoon with FIO member Massive l

Elite only

Leo Murphy: Making sense of Technical Analysis and Random Walk

Elite only
 

FuturesTrader71: Ask Me Anything

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alternatives to Monte Carlo testing Big Mike Matlab, R project and Python 6 November 5th, 2013 08:05 PM
monte carlo simulation interpretation help needed wallsteetking NinjaTrader Programming 2 October 21st, 2011 07:36 AM
Ninja Trader Monte Carlo Xeno NinjaTrader 8 April 12th, 2011 12:10 PM
Monte Carlo Simulation Big Mike Psychology and Money Management 3 February 7th, 2010 12:06 PM
NinjaTrader 7 to include Monte Carlo Simulator Big Mike Traders Hideout 1 June 14th, 2009 02:41 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 AM.

no new posts
Page generated 2017-01-18 in 0.08 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP 174.129.187.112