Dynamic Trailing Stop and Profit using ATR - Traders Hideout | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


Dynamic Trailing Stop and Profit using ATR
Updated: Views / Replies:2,712 / 20
Created: by Enric66 Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors Ė all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you donít need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

Dynamic Trailing Stop and Profit using ATR

  #1 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Barcelona Spain
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: MetaTrader
Favorite Futures: Forex
 
Posts: 13 since Aug 2015
Thanks: 15 given, 7 received

Dynamic Trailing Stop and Profit using ATR

Hi,

I have several strategies based on momentum and though these are not tradable yet I think they deserve some second thought. I'm used to set up a trailing stop based on some moving average but I made some test and the ATR seem to work better... in some cases. On strong trends moving averages seem to have better performance.

On the other side ATR look to be more in tune with the current conditions of the market.

I'm going deeper on further analysis but at this point I wonder if you use ATR (or a percentage of it) as a general rule to trail your stops? Also, if the Stops are dynamics why not the TakeProfit level? (in case we include a Take Profit on the strategy). If so, do you use a pre-defined set of variables on ATR based on Timeframe, market,...?

I recognize I don't master the ATR concept beyond its formula neither what did drive Wilder to buid it, that's one of my pending topics long list. Probably its knowledge would point me for the right use, but I'm also interested in your experience/advice so your thoughts will be very appreciated.

Enric

Reply With Quote
 
  #2 (permalink)
Quick Summary
Quick Summary Post

Quick Summary is created and edited by users like you... Add FAQ's, Links and other Relevant Information by clicking the edit button in the lower right hand corner of this message.

 
  #3 (permalink)
Elite Member
Sydney, Australia
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Sierra Chart, IRESS
Broker/Data: IB, IQFeed
Favorite Futures: ES, SPI, ASX stocks, options
 
Posts: 399 since Jun 2015
Thanks: 169 given, 446 received



Enric66 View Post
Hi,

I have several strategies based on momentum and though these are not tradable yet I think they deserve some second thought. I'm used to set up a trailing stop based on some moving average but I made some test and the ATR seem to work better... in some cases. On strong trends moving averages seem to have better performance.

On the other side ATR look to be more in tune with the current conditions of the market.

I'm going deeper on further analysis but at this point I wonder if you use ATR (or a percentage of it) as a general rule to trail your stops? Also, if the Stops are dynamics why not the TakeProfit level? (in case we include a Take Profit on the strategy). If so, do you use a pre-defined set of variables on ATR based on Timeframe, market,...?

I recognize I don't master the ATR concept beyond its formula neither what did drive Wilder to buid it, that's one of my pending topics long list. Probably its knowledge would point me for the right use, but I'm also interested in your experience/advice so your thoughts will be very appreciated.

Enric

Well you sort of answered your own question, sometimes one works better than the other - this is always the case with all arbitrary trailing stop methods, so just pick one and run with it, neither is better because neither is good.

I use to really like ATR, but because it's lagging and takes an average, when you transition from high to low volatility, your stops are too wide, then when you transition from low to high volatility, your stops are too small - this transition happens all the time and will happen when momentum comes in and then leaves the market- which is exactly where you are trying to get in and then get out. This means you always end up with a cruddy stop at the wrong time.

The same issue lies with MA's.

It's better to use a stop that is based on price action, so for a momentum uptrend break, you're looking at placing the stop a tick below the lowest low, and move it up as the market swings and makes new lows. However, you also need to understand you can get gamed at the start of a trend by people running the stops before driving the price higher, so you need to test it.

Your next question is of course, what happens when the bar is really big, you would give up a lot of the profit by using swing points as a trail? The answer is, exit on spikes - they are usually a sign of exhaustion. Your stop should work in tandem with an exit signal/target. Don't rely solely on a trailing stop because you will always miss the big spike at the end.

You can also test and find the average number of swings a market will make before it exhausts itself, so if for example 3 swings is 2 standard deviations, then it will make sense to trail and then exit on the spike in the 3rd swing.

Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to PeakGrowth for this post:
 
  #4 (permalink)
Elite Member
Omer עומר / Israel י
 
Futures Experience: Master
Platform: NinjaTrader, Proprietary,
Broker/Data: Ninjabrokerage/IQfeed + Synthetic datafeed
Favorite Futures: 6A, 6B, 6C, 6E, 6J, 6S, ES, NQ, YM, AEX, CL, NG, ZB, ZN, ZC, ZS, GC
 
rleplae's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,460 since Sep 2013
Thanks: 1,690 given, 3,653 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary


Enric66 View Post
Hi,

I have several strategies based on momentum and though these are not tradable yet I think they deserve some second thought. I'm used to set up a trailing stop based on some moving average but I made some test and the ATR seem to work better... in some cases. On strong trends moving averages seem to have better performance.

On the other side ATR look to be more in tune with the current conditions of the market.

I'm going deeper on further analysis but at this point I wonder if you use ATR (or a percentage of it) as a general rule to trail your stops? Also, if the Stops are dynamics why not the TakeProfit level? (in case we include a Take Profit on the strategy). If so, do you use a pre-defined set of variables on ATR based on Timeframe, market,...?

I recognize I don't master the ATR concept beyond its formula neither what did drive Wilder to buid it, that's one of my pending topics long list. Probably its knowledge would point me for the right use, but I'm also interested in your experience/advice so your thoughts will be very appreciated.

Enric

An issue i have encountered, when changing the stop and target dynamically in the strategy
is 'over-fill', means the original order (target or stop) gets filled and your changed new limit also
so besides the 'what is best', if you make if dynamically in the trade, you will bump into that
issue on top of all the rest...

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to rleplae for this post:
 
  #5 (permalink)
Elite Member
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker/Data: various
Favorite Futures: futures
 
Posts: 2,385 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,137 given, 4,384 received

I have found that most of the time, ATR stop and/or profit targets are much worse than just regular dollar stops and targets. That sounds strange, and doesn't always make sense, but it holds true for most of the swing type strategies I create.

If you have any questions please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io "Ask Me Anything" thread
Reply With Quote
The following 7 users say Thank You to kevinkdog for this post:
 
  #6 (permalink)
Elite Member
Luxembourg, Luxembourg
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TWS
Broker/Data: Interactive Brokers
Favorite Futures: Stocks
 
Posts: 491 since May 2012
Thanks: 1,641 given, 1,126 received


kevinkdog View Post
I have found that most of the time, ATR stop and/or profit targets are much worse than just regular dollar stops and targets. That sounds strange, and doesn't always make sense, but it holds true for most of the swing type strategies I create.

The magic of ATR is that it allows us to normalise volatility across a wide range of instruments, for instance, I can position my ZN and my ES position so that the volatility of both instruments is the same in a portfolio. As a rule of thumb, ZN with its lower volatility would have more contracts and ES of course would have less contracts. Using ATR we can get a pretty accurate picture of the volatility of both and now we can calculate the sizes of each accurately, rather than relying on the rule of thumb I mentioned earlier. Also adjusting for changes in volatility is a breeze using ATR.

Whenever you use ATR as a stop, your stop will be closer during periods of low volatility and wider during periods of high volatility. If you size your positions according to your stops, i.e. risk 1% of your capital per trade then position sizes will become smaller when volatility increases - the effect on your position sizing is exactly the same as using ATR to size positions. Of course, if you increase your stop, your profit targets should also increase. What happens now, is that by giving the trade more room, your positions have become much smaller. Also, it becomes more difficult for either your stop or target to be reached and in my own trading, positions would fluctuate a lot more without reaching either their stop or target. Thus, volatility of the portfolio lower, but positions open for longer and the trade needs to move more before you can get the same profit / loss as during low volatility periods.

Using $-stops and targets during high-volatility periods increases the odds that either your stop or target will be reached. Position sizing remains constant, but trade frequency can increase as both stops and targets have the potential to trigger sooner. If you go through a win-streak, then using $-stops will lead to greater profits than ATR-stops. However, if you hit a losing period, then you will lose more.

Reply With Quote
The following 4 users say Thank You to grausch for this post:
 
  #7 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
Barcelona Spain
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: MetaTrader
Favorite Futures: Forex
 
Posts: 13 since Aug 2015
Thanks: 15 given, 7 received


PeakGrowth View Post
It's better to use a stop that is based on price action, so for a momentum uptrend break, you're looking at placing the stop a tick below the lowest low, and move it up as the market swings and makes new lows. However, you also need to understand you can get gamed at the start of a trend by people running the stops before driving the price higher, so you need to test it.

That's the other element I was considering but didn't look as "fancy" (just kidding here) as my other two options; MA's and ATR. I had the feeling that ATR could be more reliable on adjusting the Stop as a mesure of how excited the market is.
Also the Profit. If the market spikes and enter on its exhaustion zone you better take the Profit and run.


kevinkdog View Post
I have found that most of the time, ATR stop and/or profit targets are much worse than just regular dollar stops and targets. That sounds strange, and doesn't always make sense, but it holds true for most of the swing type strategies I create.

That opens a new perspective to me. In fact sounds quite strange but if it works well worth a try. Though I'm quite averse to explore things against my rational mind.

Reply With Quote
 
  #8 (permalink)
Elite Member
Luxembourg, Luxembourg
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TWS
Broker/Data: Interactive Brokers
Favorite Futures: Stocks
 
Posts: 491 since May 2012
Thanks: 1,641 given, 1,126 received


Enric66 View Post
Hi,

I have several strategies based on momentum and though these are not tradable yet I think they deserve some second thought. I'm used to set up a trailing stop based on some moving average but I made some test and the ATR seem to work better... in some cases. On strong trends moving averages seem to have better performance.

On the other side ATR look to be more in tune with the current conditions of the market.

I'm going deeper on further analysis but at this point I wonder if you use ATR (or a percentage of it) as a general rule to trail your stops? Also, if the Stops are dynamics why not the TakeProfit level? (in case we include a Take Profit on the strategy). If so, do you use a pre-defined set of variables on ATR based on Timeframe, market,...?

I recognize I don't master the ATR concept beyond its formula neither what did drive Wilder to buid it, that's one of my pending topics long list. Probably its knowledge would point me for the right use, but I'm also interested in your experience/advice so your thoughts will be very appreciated.

Enric

If you wish to learn about the application of ATR then the following book may of interest to you - Way of the Turtle: The Secret Methods that Turned Ordinary People into Legendary Traders: Curtis Faith: 9780071486644: Amazon.com: Books. Curtis Faith was one of the original Turtles and I found his explanation of the system best. The Turtles used ATR to normalise volatility across different instruments and their methods are really useful if you wish to do that. Of course, they also used ATR-stops, but that is not the primary use of ATR in the system.

Regarding trailing stops, review this thread on the TradingBlox forum - Dead Turtles - Traders' Roundtable. You will note that trailing stops degraded system performance in all cases. Best results were had once they started scaling out of trades. The logic was to take the full position on entry, either get stopped out on the full position, or gradually scale back as the trades start working. I also tested various trailing stops and found that while they make me feel better, i.e. I get more winning trades, as a whole they degrade my performance.

Of course, the Turtles used long term strategies on daily bars, which may not be applicable to day- or swing-trading - nonetheless, in my own development I learnt a lot from Curtis Faith's books and some of these principles I still apply today.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to grausch for this post:
 
  #9 (permalink)
Elite Member
Leeds UK
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: FXTrade
Broker/Data: Interactive Brokers, CapitalSpreads, Oanda
Favorite Futures: GBP/USD
 
Tymbeline's Avatar
 
Posts: 401 since Apr 2015
Thanks: 894 given, 486 received


Enric66 View Post
I wonder if you use ATR (or a percentage of it) as a general rule to trail your stops?

I don't, at the moment, myself, but in his book Trade Your Way to Financial Freedom Van K. Tharp details several examples of trading methods (mostly for commodities, as I remember) for which an ATR multiple proved a stable, consistent and productive method of trailing a stop. It's a perfectly viable method, in principle. The question, of course, is whether it's better overall - for any individual method - than any other, which is typically far from easy to research and prove.


Enric66 View Post
I made some test and the ATR seem to work better... in some cases.

No great surprise, there? The reality is that those key words "in some cases" are going to apply whatever method you use for trailing a stop, if trailing stops are your approach. Whatever method you eventually use, there will always be occasions when something else, with hindsight, would have been better. This is just one of the inescapable market realities, but it by no means excludes ATR-multiples/fractions as a valid method.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Tymbeline for this post:
 
  #10 (permalink)
Elite Member
Sydney, Australia
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Sierra Chart, IRESS
Broker/Data: IB, IQFeed
Favorite Futures: ES, SPI, ASX stocks, options
 
Posts: 399 since Jun 2015
Thanks: 169 given, 446 received



Enric66 View Post
That's the other element I was considering but didn't look as "fancy" (just kidding here) as my other two options; MA's and ATR. I had the feeling that ATR could be more reliable on adjusting the Stop as a mesure of how excited the market is.
Also the Profit. If the market spikes and enter on its exhaustion zone you better take the Profit and run.



That opens a new perspective to me. In fact sounds quite strange but if it works well worth a try. Though I'm quite averse to explore things against my rational mind.

Having an open mind will help you find success a lot faster, don't let your ego get in the way.

It may not be rational to you now, but once you accumulate more knowledge you may look back and think how irrational it is now. Statistics don't lie, but your mind loves to lie to you by connecting dots and rationale that aren't necessarily there.

Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > Dynamic Trailing Stop and Profit using ATR

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Linda Bradford Raschke: Reading The Tape

Elite only

Adam Grimes: TBA

Elite only

NinjaTrader: TBA

January

Ran Aroussi: TBA

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trailing Stop based on ATR rahulgopi TradeStation 3 October 9th, 2014 11:51 PM
Dynamic trailing stop no erocla MultiCharts 2 May 27th, 2014 06:03 AM
multicharts- ATR trailing stop expert adviser? Ryan Scobby MultiCharts 1 December 7th, 2012 12:31 PM
ATR Trailing Stop Parameter Optimization tbmuc Elite Automated Trading 2 November 29th, 2012 04:52 PM
Free stock charts with ATR Trailing stop peglegtrading Traders Hideout 1 December 1st, 2011 02:48 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-12-10 in 0.20 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.90.207.75