Integrating Martingale strategy into something already overbought/sold - Traders Hideout | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


Integrating Martingale strategy into something already overbought/sold
Updated: Views / Replies:2,087 / 23
Created: by FreeMktFisherMN Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors Ė all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you donít need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

Integrating Martingale strategy into something already overbought/sold

  #21 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
evanston
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: TT
Favorite Futures: oil
 
Posts: 19 since Dec 2013
Thanks: 0 given, 0 received

Well trading is not a game of certainty (unless one has inside info as seen with gold shooting up $40 fractionally before the taper/un-taper FOMC minutes a few months ago), so it's about finding an edge and looking to exploit it. It's a 50/50 theoretical deal, and then looking for ways to improve that.

Obviously one 'bad' outcome would wipe out all the smaller gains, but again, having the risk capital in the first place is basically a prerequisite such that one can stay committed and not have arbitrary moves.

Regarding things like contango/backwardation, definitely those have to be considered. This would go under the 'add to commission costs' category, so one would need to not exit until a 'sizable' profit is attained, aka not just one tick then exit.

If coffee were to compress to say below .50/lb I still don't see how there wouldn't be enough volatility to capture a sufficient gain. Coffee does not keep obviously for so much time is another factor.

They've already got it separated into the different types of coffee, robusta and arabica.

Regarding the other factors, this is risk capital, and when I mean that I mean I already have other things stockpiled such as guns, food, precious metals, water filters, etc, so if something very unlikely were to happen such that market ceased to exist/price ceiling, I would not be out on the margin.

From what I've seen of coffee intraday, it has some big range days. Again, subjective things like patience to wait it out is not something I'd have as a deterrent, as again risk capital and the whole premise of the trade in the first place being the supply/demand reversion.

I would say I'd rather do it with something like crude oil if that were the only difference. But again, it still is about relative extremes. And I say this as someone who has reverence for volatility and fat tails and black swans. Part of what I would view as a solid way to go about this is wait for such a black swan to happen such that it is so compressed or what have you, and then it just increases the probabilities.

So the risk capital aspect is a huge criterion, as is just the notion that this is about daring something very extreme to happen. Commodities are already way beaten down, looking at things fundamentally, and when credit crunches start happening historically is when the debt ponzi central/commercial banking cartel turns the printers into overdrive.

Reply With Quote
 
  #22 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Cleveland Ohio/United States
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Broker/Data: various
Favorite Futures: futures
 
Posts: 2,388 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 1,138 given, 4,385 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary


FreeMktFisherMN View Post
Well trading is not a game of certainty (unless one has inside info as seen with gold shooting up $40 fractionally before the taper/un-taper FOMC minutes a few months ago), so it's about finding an edge and looking to exploit it. It's a 50/50 theoretical deal, and then looking for ways to improve that.

Obviously one 'bad' outcome would wipe out all the smaller gains, but again, having the risk capital in the first place is basically a prerequisite such that one can stay committed and not have arbitrary moves.

Regarding things like contango/backwardation, definitely those have to be considered. This would go under the 'add to commission costs' category, so one would need to not exit until a 'sizable' profit is attained, aka not just one tick then exit.

If coffee were to compress to say below .50/lb I still don't see how there wouldn't be enough volatility to capture a sufficient gain. Coffee does not keep obviously for so much time is another factor.

They've already got it separated into the different types of coffee, robusta and arabica.

Regarding the other factors, this is risk capital, and when I mean that I mean I already have other things stockpiled such as guns, food, precious metals, water filters, etc, so if something very unlikely were to happen such that market ceased to exist/price ceiling, I would not be out on the margin.

From what I've seen of coffee intraday, it has some big range days. Again, subjective things like patience to wait it out is not something I'd have as a deterrent, as again risk capital and the whole premise of the trade in the first place being the supply/demand reversion.

I would say I'd rather do it with something like crude oil if that were the only difference. But again, it still is about relative extremes. And I say this as someone who has reverence for volatility and fat tails and black swans. Part of what I would view as a solid way to go about this is wait for such a black swan to happen such that it is so compressed or what have you, and then it just increases the probabilities.

So the risk capital aspect is a huge criterion, as is just the notion that this is about daring something very extreme to happen. Commodities are already way beaten down, looking at things fundamentally, and when credit crunches start happening historically is when the debt ponzi central/commercial banking cartel turns the printers into overdrive.

Good luck with the trade, then!

If you have any questions please send me a Private Message or use the futures.io "Ask Me Anything" thread
Reply With Quote
 
  #23 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
evanston
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: TT
Favorite Futures: oil
 
Posts: 19 since Dec 2013
Thanks: 0 given, 0 received


I have no clue whether I'll ever do a trade like this. Even if I never do, if I wind up in the trading industry, I do know that I believe I'd be using setups at least somewhat in this framework of daring something 'extreme' to happen.

As I said elsewhere on this thread, I more so would be looking at long crude at 92 recently where it was, SL 90.50 (hits there 89 handle seems likely and more weakness/flush longs) first tgt mid 90s, second trailing stop 102-104, as I have indicators up there of 'unfinished business' (plus that 101-104.50 area was a persistent range prior to it breaking through late summer beneath 100).

Hindsight bias cannot be ignored, no question. Looking at it game theory wise, governments throughout history when in a bind print currency/dilute the coinage of real precious metal content. They don't let the malinvestments get punished and allow real price discovery. They kick the can until Detroit happens. I am a huge Austrian school econ guy, and study this stuff a lot.

It's one way to value invest, no doubt. It's not trading in the sense of scalping and whatnot. I just am always looking for what works, no matter how unconventional. No certainty ever, but that comes with the territory of trading.

Reply With Quote
 
  #24 (permalink)
Trading Apprentice
evanston
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: TT
Favorite Futures: oil
 
Posts: 19 since Dec 2013
Thanks: 0 given, 0 received

just did a sample of doing the martingale setup with coffee. Say buy 5k worth of JO (coffee ETF) at 1/lb. Hard to say what upside tgt should be before willing to exit, but I'd say 2% at least for starters (this lot here is not the key one; but if it runs quickly in one's favor say 4% or so, take profit and consider it either a done deal with coffee and that one got something out of its oversold condition, or re buy lower to finance a long.

But continuing on, then say it goes to .9/lb. Buy 10k worth of JO so long 15k at basis of .9333. Need .93955, .9427, .952 to be up 100, up 1%, and up 2 %, respectively. And it's at .9 obviously starting out.

Keep doing this, and say it gets to .6/lb. You'd be long $75k total at a cost basis of .77329/lb, and down $16,500 on the account, and at this point it would be 80k worth at .6/lb. to keep going. And then basis is .683, and long 155k worth total.
need .697 to be up 2% from here, which is a sizable move up from .6 (16%).

It's all about looking for the retrace. And obviously it's different with an ETF to a degree vs. the KC future itself, as far as what profit target is enough to be worth it. Coffee was over 3/lb. few yrs. ago, so that is a huge factor prior to getting involved in a trade like this. Other option is to even widen out the distance between scaling in, or do it every .05/lb. instead of .10 it goes down.

The needed magnitude of increase is a big deal, no doubt, as it is going from .6 to .7 roughly for the B/E, as opposed to from the initial entry of 1/lb. where going from .6 to .7 is just 10% relative to initial position.

Gold retraced from 1180 to 1430 not long ago, which is a 21% retrace.

Being down 16,500 if it goes to .6 and one has done the doubling down and total long $75k doesn't seem horrible relative to what this trade CAN entail, but it's all about that sizable retrace. And have to have enough winners, too, to make it worth it over time as well, as this could take who knows how long and not have been profitable yet. Even if it does go from .6 to .7 and one makes the 2.1% or whatever, that is only +3100 profit on the initial 155k invested.

Doing this with something way beaten down (and a commodity at that) would have to be the case for me to consider it, no question. And total risk capital, nothing 'essential0. Or obviously one could just say that's it, that's my 75k, no more adding, but I'm holding and going to hang on for however long it takes. And it's not as though one is way down on the 75k total put into JO at that point where it is .6/lb. One still has the position and it's not like a gamble where there is no underlying asset, as it's just totally a new turn.

Interesting to actually do the math behind this.


Last edited by FreeMktFisherMN; December 11th, 2013 at 02:31 AM.
Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > Integrating Martingale strategy into something already overbought/sold

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Linda Bradford Raschke: Reading The Tape

Elite only

Adam Grimes: TBA

Elite only

NinjaTrader: TBA

January

Ran Aroussi: TBA

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Integrating NT (historical/live data) into Matlab CaptainFill Matlab, R project and Python 4 October 30th, 2013 08:14 PM
Martingale testing quantismo Elite Automated NinjaTrader Trading 13 February 25th, 2013 04:46 AM
overbought/oversold that works on ninja market analyzer wpick NinjaTrader 1 October 1st, 2012 10:26 PM
THE UNFORTUNATE TRUTH ABOUT AN OVERBOUGHT STOCK MARKET Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 October 30th, 2011 03:30 AM
Integrating existing DLL in NT7 indi martinp NinjaTrader Programming 8 February 15th, 2011 03:32 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 AM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-12-12 in 0.12 seconds with 27 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.90.207.75