NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Discretionary trades vs system trades (for elite performers)


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one TheDude with 2 posts (2 thanks)
    2. looks_two baruchs with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    3. looks_3 ab456 with 1 posts (1 thanks)
    4. looks_4 strikebackfast with 1 posts (0 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one trendisyourfriend with 3 thanks per post
    2. looks_two Johno1 with 2 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 TheDude with 1 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 ab456 with 1 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 4,617 views
    2. thumb_up 8 thanks given
    3. group 7 followers
    1. forum 8 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Discretionary trades vs system trades (for elite performers)

  #1 (permalink)
 strikebackfast 
Singapore
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: Ninjatrader
Broker: DDT / Kinetick
Trading: 6E
Posts: 62 since Jun 2013
Thanks Given: 76
Thanks Received: 85

Hi guys,

I've been pondering over this issue for a little bit during my off time, maybe the more experienced could chip in with their views.

I fully understand the merits of having a solid tested, almost mechanical system for new to semi experienced traders as that will narrow their errors if they could follow their system to the T. It is definitely the best way to start trading and be a profitable trader as long as your system retains an edge in the market you are trading.

However , does this apply for an elite trader? Someone that has 10,000++ hours under his belt and have no psychological issues whatsoever executing. Ie. The tiger woods of trading. Could I argue that once one reaches that stage of trading , he should be allowed room for creativity instead of rigidly following rules which may limit the amount of trades he may take. With that amount of experience, would you guys agree that discretion should play a much larger part in trading as he can rely on his years of experience to push the boundaries of his expectancy and attain greater heights in his trading ?

Would love to hear thoughts from more experienced traders on this aspect. I have just read Talent Is Overrated (great read) and am wondering if creativity has a role to play in the seemingly "mechanical" world of trading.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
Futures True Range Report
The Elite Circle
Are there any eval firms that allow you to sink to your …
Traders Hideout
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
New Micros: Ultra 10-Year & Ultra T-Bond -- Live Now
Treasury Notes and Bonds
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
61 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
39 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
26 thanks
The Program
18 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
18 thanks
  #2 (permalink)
 ab456 
New Delhi, India
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: SierraChart NinjaTrader,
Trading: ES,Stocks, Futures
Posts: 170 since Sep 2011
Thanks Given: 734
Thanks Received: 111


strikebackfast View Post
Hi guys,

I've been pondering over this issue for a little bit during my off time, maybe the more experienced could chip in with their views.

I fully understand the merits of having a solid tested, almost mechanical system for new to semi experienced traders as that will narrow their errors if they could follow their system to the T. It is definitely the best way to start trading and be a profitable trader as long as your system retains an edge in the market you are trading.

However , does this apply for an elite trader? Someone that has 10,000++ hours under his belt and have no psychological issues whatsoever executing. Ie. The tiger woods of trading. Could I argue that once one reaches that stage of trading , he should be allowed room for creativity instead of rigidly following rules which may limit the amount of trades he may take. With that amount of experience, would you guys agree that discretion should play a much larger part in trading as he can rely on his years of experience to push the boundaries of his expectancy and attain greater heights in his trading ?

Would love to hear thoughts from more experienced traders on this aspect. I have just read Talent Is Overrated (great read) and am wondering if creativity has a role to play in the seemingly "mechanical" world of trading.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4

I would personally agree with that, provided he has gained real insightful experience regarding the market dynamics and has good level of self awareness and does not get too much excited / depressed with trading gains / losses.

This way he could even improve the output of his mechanical trading systems, because no matter how advanced / sophisticated a mechanical system is made, it still cannot cover all the elements that have impact on the market prices. Whereas a human being can easily notice this change in the Larger Context and then make subjective judgment regarding the signals being generated by his automated system.

But I would again say that this only applies on real experienced traders and not on those guys who although have 20 years of trading experience but have no real understanding of this game and who are just surviving somehow based on hit and trial methods.

Thanks and regards

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #3 (permalink)
 baruchs 
Israel
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: pfg
Trading: eminis
Posts: 323 since Jun 2009


System trading = TA
Discretionary trading = Gambling.

Decide who you are.

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)
 Koepisch 
@ Germany
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus Futures/Zen-Fire
Trading: FDAX
Posts: 569 since Nov 2011
Thanks Given: 440
Thanks Received: 518

I try to minimize all discretionary parts from my trading. I started as a system trader but falled back to have a descretionary portion mixed to it. I doesn't like that und i try to remove this part again. For me it's better to give up some gains and let the system run independently. This is the only way to get your STATISTICS right and proove your edge.

My "discretionary part" is trade filterung only. Because i can identify potential entries some time ahead, i enable/disable the trade execution. In this way i can still have entries without larger latency or slippage. This works also in an Master(Home)-Slave(VPS) environment.

Koepisch

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)
TheDude
london
 
Posts: 165 since Jan 2012
Thanks Given: 43
Thanks Received: 162


baruchs View Post
System trading = TA
Discretionary trading = Gambling.

Decide who you are.

Anyone who relies solely upon TA is gambling, whether they admit it or realise it or not.

Why else do you think 80% of 'traders' lose? They just lose.

Trading isnt analysis. Its something quite different.

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)
TheDude
london
 
Posts: 165 since Jan 2012
Thanks Given: 43
Thanks Received: 162

"Gambling is the wagering of money or something of material value (referred to as "the stakes") on an event with an uncertain outcome with the primary intent of winning additional money and/or material goods. Gambling thus requires three elements be present: consideration, chance and prize.[1] Typically, the outcome of the wager is evident within a short period."

Gambling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I guess we're all gambling whether we like it or not.

How can one achieve success in any endeavour if one cannot even appreciate or understand what one is doing?

You need an edge to succeed in any form of gambling.

As markets are constantly changing, this implies that the edge of any mechanical system is also changing.

Therefore 'sticking rigidly to rules' and 'faultless execution' are terms new traders pick up on, and regurgitated by forum gurus, when in fact they are the death of many traders.

There is nothing inherently wrong in systematic trading - so long as you keep changing your model which in itself is beyond the pale of many 'hobby' traders. So by all means stick to your rules, but just make sure your rules are changing too.

This involves a lot more work than back testing something over 5 years of historical data in Tradestation and expecting it to work in the future. People who claim to have found such methods mostly liars pure and simple.

Just my thoughts.

Edit - rules come in 2 types:

1 risk management and money management. These generally should be stuck to - although risk rules (parameters may be better word) may change with vola for eg. Unless you stick to these like glue, you will blow up.
2. execution rules. These are the ones that will change. Stick to these like glue and you will blow up.

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)
 artemiso 
New York, NY
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: Vanguard 401k
Broker: Yahoo Finance
Trading: Mutual funds
Posts: 1,152 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 784
Thanks Received: 2,685

1. There's nothing wrong with discretionary trading - some of the best traders are discretionary macro traders.

2. On the other hand, when I was at a trading floor that mixed discretionary and systematic trading, we used to lose a Bloomberg terminal every few months because someone would get taken advantage of and grab the nearest Polycom phone/BBG keyboard and throw it at a monitor.

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)
 
trendisyourfriend's Avatar
 trendisyourfriend 
Quebec Canada
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, NQ, YM
Frequency: Daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 4,527 since Oct 2009
Thanks Given: 4,171
Thanks Received: 6,018


artemiso View Post
...The real edge is your creativity, not some statistics that you borrowed from a textbook that everyone else knows.
...

I like your definition. I'd also add to that good common sense. Common sense is not a simple thing. It is an immense society of hard earned ideas, of multitudes of life-learned rules and exceptions, dispositions and tendencies, balances and checks.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #9 (permalink)
Johno1
Geelong Victoria
 
Posts: 113 since Jan 2015
Thanks Given: 45
Thanks Received: 92


trendisyourfriend View Post
I like your definition. I'd also add to that good common sense. Common sense is not a simple thing. It is an immense society of hard earned ideas, of multitudes of life-learned rules and exceptions, dispositions and tendencies, balances and checks.

Exactly.

Too many people forget this and allow themselves to get baffled by the Bullsh-t.

Cheers John

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on July 18, 2017


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts