NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Ask me anything about hedge funds and HFT


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one artemiso with 43 posts (142 thanks)
    2. looks_two Cachevary with 8 posts (1 thanks)
    3. looks_3 quantarb with 5 posts (4 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Profiler with 3 posts (1 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Deucalion with 4 thanks per post
    2. looks_two artemiso with 3.3 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Jura with 2 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 quantarb with 0.8 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 45,324 views
    2. thumb_up 177 thanks given
    3. group 39 followers
    1. forum 91 posts
    2. attach_file 1 attachments




 
 

Ask me anything about hedge funds and HFT

 
 artemiso 
New York, NY
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: Vanguard 401k
Broker: Yahoo Finance
Trading: Mutual funds
Posts: 1,152 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 784
Thanks Received: 2,685

I've seen several myths (mostly on another forum, thankfully) about quantitative/"high-frequency" trading lately and decided to start this thread for the younger guys on the forum who are considering to pursue a career in buy-side finance.

I'll reply whatever's within my means: I did purely quantitative trading at two large hedge funds and an investment bank before starting my own firm. I have a BS in physics and math and left academia right before I finished my PhD. My firm has more than twice the number of "HYPSM" degrees as it has employees. I'll prefer not to discuss low level details about strategy implementation or what a particular firm does. We're also not looking for funds or employees, so I can't take any inquiries about those. My goal is more to dispel unfair accusations about Wall Street/HFT in popular media, share what's meaningful about a career in finance, and encourage the younger guys to enter this field for more purposeful motivations besides money.

Started this thread

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Exit Strategy
NinjaTrader
NexusFi Journal Challenge - April 2024
Feedback and Announcements
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
My NT8 Volume Profile Split by Asian/Euro/Open
NinjaTrader
New Micros: Ultra 10-Year & Ultra T-Bond -- Live Now
Treasury Notes and Bonds
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
61 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
38 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
27 thanks
The Program
18 thanks
Battlestations: Show us your trading desks!
18 thanks
 
 ziggy123 
boston
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: ninja
Trading: es
Posts: 136 since Mar 2013
Thanks Given: 29
Thanks Received: 99


I was involved in quantitative research but on higher time frames. Some of my friends back in Israel are experts in AI etc. On of them was actually doing a funded research in looking at historical data of poker games and trying to identify "inefficiencies "

Are HFT companies still willing to pay a few millions to be 1 foot closer to the exchange ?

I see that you are in Cambridge, MA - I'm in BackBay Boston - almost neighbors

Steve

 
 traderwerks   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 692 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 436
Thanks Received: 465

What kind of Sharpe ratios are HFT funds achieving now? Isn't the HFT space getting more competitive now? I know a couple of funds that were minting money back in the day ( 2007 ) are now closed.


-me

And personally, I think it should be HPSM

Math. A gateway drug to reality.
Thanked by:
 
 artemiso 
New York, NY
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: Vanguard 401k
Broker: Yahoo Finance
Trading: Mutual funds
Posts: 1,152 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 784
Thanks Received: 2,685


ziggy123 View Post
I was involved in quantitative research but on higher time frames. Some of my friends back in Israel are experts in AI etc. On of them was actually doing a funded research in looking at historical data of poker games and trying to identify "inefficiencies "

Are HFT companies still willing to pay a few millions to be 1 foot closer to the exchange ?

I see that you are in Cambridge, MA - I'm in BackBay Boston - almost neighbors

Steve

Great to know others in the area. I hope you were safe during the ordeal.

1 foot of propagation latency is not enough to justify a few million, but you're in the right ballpark for infrastructural costs. It will also depend on the strategies deployed, but most of this is paid for the low-latency interconnect between venues.


traderwerks View Post
What kind of Sharpe ratios are HFT funds achieving now? Isn't the HFT space getting more competitive now? I know a couple of funds that were minting money back in the day ( 2007 ) are now closed.


-me

And personally, I think it should be HPSM

I wouldn't know the average, but the maximum I've seen is low hundred, delivered over a year.

1. Every field and industry gets more competitive with time and undergoes consolidation, so it is not unexpected.
2. The firms that had always dominated the field are well-and-alive.
3. 2012-2013 has seen a growth in hiring (although this has been associated with a decay in sell-side employment).
4. In a broad sense, strategies in this space are buy-high-sell-low (no typo), which means there are simply less opportunities in the traditional space of listed and displayed markets in today's environment.
5. Of course, many firms have both low-latency and long duration strategies. I'm just scrapping the surface but in '08 we had the stock market and interest rates move down together and that was enough to toast many of these funds. (Their strategy re-allocations effectively resembled total return swaps which had 0.2 sigma.)
6. There are plenty of opportunities in the low-latency space that are yet unexplored. Some of these require regulatory clearance and joint effort (e.g. messaging in non-deliverable forwards).
7. The attrition rate in any kind of fund, not just those dealing with low-latency strategies, is very high. Obviously if the media is doing a good job of their statistics, they should detrend this to remove extraneous variables.

(: I've been to a few conferences in the past 2 years and from my angle, I wouldn't put Stanford on the list.

Started this thread
Thanked by:
 
 addchild 
Bay Area California
 
Experience: None
Platform: TT T4
Broker: Phillip Capital
Trading: Futures
Posts: 809 since Nov 2011
Thanks Given: 926
Thanks Received: 898

Do optimal execution algorithms effect price discovery?

.
Thanked by:
 
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 50,397 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,173
Thanks Received: 101,537

What is the average hold time per trade for institutional non-HFT

Sent from my Nexus 4

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list
Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Exclusive money saving offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal
Thanked by:
 
 artemiso 
New York, NY
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: Vanguard 401k
Broker: Yahoo Finance
Trading: Mutual funds
Posts: 1,152 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 784
Thanks Received: 2,685


addchild View Post
Do optimal execution algorithms effect price discovery?

That's a good question.

Short answer is no.

I prefer the academic view: The first order relationship would be that information drives risk-neutral pricing from market makers (whether designated or functional) who have the choice to widen their spreads, which then drives price discovery. It makes sense from an agent-based or behavioral view of the market that there are higher-order relationships which drive price discovery, but these would be indistinguishable from a stochastic process.

The practitioner's view is easier to grasp: The execution algorithms that the majority of the institutional traders use, by design, do not attempt to capture opportunity costs of informed trading. It's considerably easier to solve this program. Also, if you're designing an execution algorithm, chances are that you were educated in a way that ingrained EMH in you. So you'd probably think it makes little sense to have a forecast on the price in your execution algorithm anyway.

Started this thread
 
 artemiso 
New York, NY
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: Vanguard 401k
Broker: Yahoo Finance
Trading: Mutual funds
Posts: 1,152 since Jul 2012
Thanks Given: 784
Thanks Received: 2,685


Big Mike View Post
What is the average hold time per trade for institutional non-HFT

Sent from my Nexus 4

@Big Mike

Another good question, and this actually requires some detail because I realize people don't think a lot about it: what exactly is a "hold time"?

Firstly, an educated answer is that the $80 trillion or so in pension funds, mutual funds and insurance greatly dwarves the $2.3 trillion hedge fund industry. If you are investing an insurance company's portfolio, the major risk factor that drives your portfolio is the duration in long-tail products such as variable annuity, so the view is really in the precision of days and above. If you are managing a mutual fund, the goal is all about minimizing tracking error against a particular index, and effects such as dilution, delisting, M&A do not take place intraday, so the trading horizons are really in the precision of days and you leave it all to an execution desk or algo to deal with the nitty gritty of large-order transaction costs.

I'm guessing your question is more geared towards hedge funds and their consensus is on an "optimal trading horizon". Large hedge funds trade long horizons again in the order of days and above - it's not that they prefer to, but rather they have to because of the size and the small number of distinct strategies you can run before you eventually run into institutional frictions. (Most I've seen is like 20.)

Another issue is that average hold time is a very uninteresting thing to measure when you have a large portfolio. An institutional trading platform like Tethys aggregates firmwide trades so if manager A shorts Q of S and manager B goes long Q of S, the net position is zero. Then a while later manager B offloads S so now the engine has to short Q - I don't really know how you'd put a finger on "holding period" because I can see many different ways to measure it for different parties. Or if your position size changes with a sequence like: +3, +7, -2, -2, +4. You can see how quickly this gets out of hand. In practice, Manager A, B; risk department and management should have different measures because they have different interests.

While trade holding time is an ambiguous metric, order duration is not (the full equities feed lets you track each order by a unique ID). And of course, about 30% of orders are cancelled in under a second.

Started this thread
 
 traderwerks   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 692 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 436
Thanks Received: 465


Here is a question about making taking liquidity.

Some companies especially in Chicago came up on market making, that is providing liquidity. Recently a CFTC ( or SEC , I cannot rmemeber ) report said that HFT firms take liquidity 57% of the time. Do you see more liquidity takers or liquidity makers nowadays ?

Math. A gateway drug to reality.
Thanked by:

 



Last Updated on July 30, 2023


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts