Rand Paul thinks Senators should actually read the bills they are voting on - futures io
futures io futures trading

Rand Paul thinks Senators should actually read the bills they are voting on

Discussion in Traders Hideout

    1. trending_up 426 views
    2. thumb_up 1 thanks given
    3. group 1 followers
    1. forum 1 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments

Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 125,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

Search this Thread

Rand Paul thinks Senators should actually read the bills they are voting on

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
Aurora, Il USA
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Trading: futures
kbit's Avatar
Posts: 5,902 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,294 given, 3,357 received

Well, here’s a novel idea: Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) has introduced legislation that would make it mandatory for elected lawmakers to actually read bills before voting for or against them.

From Washington, D.C. on Friday, Sen. Paul put forth a bill that, if passed, would permit one full day of reading for every 20 pages of legislation being presented. He introduced the bill last week before the US Senate was scheduled to vote on a 600-page legislation that brought together topics as varying as highway funding and student loans all into a single document proposal.

“Not one member of the Senate will read this bill before we vote on it,” Paul insisted. "For goodness sakes, this is a 600-page bill. I got it this morning.”

Paul suggested that the lack of public faith in the current Congress could be blamed on, among other things, lawmakers lacking a basic understanding of the legislation they are elected to decide on. Rule 28, Paragraph 9 of the Senate guidebook currently require bills to be put on hold for 48 hours before being brought up for vote, but Sen. Paul said even that provision is rarely enforced.

“Congress has a 10 percent approval rating and one of the reasons is that we don’t even obey our own rules,” said the Senator. "At the very least, we ought to adhere to our own rules," he said. "Forty-eight hours is still a challenge to find out everything in here."

In hopes of remedying the public’s disapproval with Washington, Paul put forth his bill that he hopes will help Congress come to terms with the exact issues they are expected to vote on.

"In keeping with my pledge to increase transparency and accessibility in the U.S. Senate, I am proud to introduce this rule change today. Too often in Congress, legislation is shoved through without hearings, amendments or debate. If we are to answer to the American people, it is imperative we pay close attention to the legislation we consider to ensure it is in concert with the Constitution and purview of the Senate's authority,” he said.

Paul also introduced a separate legislation, S. 3359, which he described as “A bill to end the practice of including more than one subject in a single bill by requiring that each bill enacted by Congress be limited to only one subject.”

Rand Paul thinks Senators should actually read the bills they are voting on — RT

Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Anyone have access to older, intraday data for stocks(AXP)?
Stocks and ETFs
Market Position Indicator
The Elite Circle
Which kind of Blockvolume is visible? - order processing
Emini and Emicro Index
Webinar: Finding your own way in trading w/Adam Grimes
The Elite Circle
OFA (Order Flow Analytics) Licence
(login for full post details)
  #2 (permalink)
Site Sponsor

Web: Jigsaw Trading
AMA: Ask Me Anything
Webinars: Jigsaw Trading Webinars
Elite offer: Click here
Jigsaw Trading's Avatar
Posts: 2,977 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 823 given, 10,315 received

Something is very wrong when the bills end up being 600 pages.

600 pages - no-one reads it
600 pages - no-one implements it
600 pages - anything can be slipped into it

I also doubt that anyone other than a lawyer could decifer the documents, hence 20 pages per day.

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Jigsaw Trading for this post:

futures io Trading Community Traders Hideout > Rand Paul thinks Senators should actually read the bills they are voting on

Last Updated on July 3, 2012

Upcoming Webinars and Events

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!


Battlestations! Show us your trading desk - $1,500 in prizes!


Importance of Finding Your Own Way w/Adam Grimes

Elite only

Journal Challenge w/Jigsaw


Copyright © 2021 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts