Sleazy business: CISPA ‘pushed by spy & tech companies for profit' - futures io
futures io futures trading

Sleazy business: CISPA ‘pushed by spy & tech companies for profit'

Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated by kbit
    1. trending_up 449 views
    2. thumb_up 0 thanks given
    3. group 0 followers
    1. forum 0 replies
    2. attach_file 0 attachments

Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

Search this Thread

Sleazy business: CISPA ‘pushed by spy & tech companies for profit'

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
Aurora, Il USA
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Trading: futures
kbit's Avatar
Posts: 5,902 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,294 given, 3,353 received

With the House of Representatives set to vote on the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) next week, David Seaman, the host of “The DL Show”, tells RT why Google and Facebook won’t help Americans to kill this act.

*The White House has voiced concerns over the controversial cyber-security bill, which in December passed the House Intelligence Committee with an overwhelming vote of 17-1. Opposition from the Obama administration stopped short of a veto threat, saying that the legislation should not sacrifice the privacy of Americans in the name of security.

Over 680,000 people have signed an anti-CISPA Web petition since several US rights groups launched a "Stop Cyber Spying" campaign on Tuesday.

Sponsors of the bill say CISPA is intended to improve computer security by allowing companies and government agencies to share sensitive information. But journalist David Seaman tells RT most Americans won’t want the regulation.

RT: To be fair, there are countless scary-sounding bills frequently floating around Congress that stand some chance to become law. Why should we care about this one?

David Seaman: CISPA is a very real threat. It stands a very good chance of becoming law within a very short period of time. It has over 100 co-sponsors in Congress. Unlike SOPA, which led to huge online outrage from the public and tech companies alike, this one actually has the support of key tech companies.

With the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), which failed, there was a petition linked to the Google home page. Major web properties including Reddit and Wikipedia went dark to protest it. They are probably not going to do so this time.

The White House has expressed concerns, but don’t let that reassure you too much. They also expressed concerns about the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and then Obama signed it into law on the New Year’s Eve.

RT: Why have such companies as Facebook and Google not come out against this legislation? What’s in it for them?

DS: Whenever you are gathering data, it is a potential business model, and a sleazy one in my opinion. You can sell it to the government or privately-held security companies and make money over it, so it is a revenue stream.

Furthermore, I think these big tech companies love the litigation immunity.

We are talking very private information here: the websites you visit; the searches you make; if you are doing research on a personal medical condition; if you are sending private emails to your spouse or anybody else. These emails could be seen by a number of people. The litigation immunity protects these companies from being sued.

RT: Are you saying that Congress is intentionally trying to screw over American freedoms for privacy, speech and information?

DS: From people I have spoken to online it really sounds that when you contact your member of Congress and say “I don’t want CISPA. It is not good for the Internet, for economy or for privacy,” their responses approach detached amusement. They don’t really care what you think at this point. It freaks many people out and for a good reason.

RT:What about defense contractor lobbyists on the Hill pushing for this legislation?

DS: The Internet works pretty well without special regulations, so regular citizens would not go asking for that. CISPA has been pushed by spying companies and a handful of tech companies for profit reasons. It is totally counter to the interests of most Americans.

Congress could also be focusing on a number of more important issues: what about increasing transparency and liquidity on financial markets? What about bringing people back to work? Any of these things would make better use of their time than these crazy spying bills which make us look like a joke on the world stage.

RT:Why should average Americans be bothered?

DS: Well, do you want strangers – people in local police departments, people at privately-run security companies – do you want them to be poring through years of your emails or every single Google search you made late at night? I will get no accountability for that. And then, if they turn it against you in the worst possible way, you won’t be able to get a lawyer and sue them because of the litigation immunity.

Sleazy business: CISPA ?pushed by spy & tech companies for profit' — RT

Reply With Quote

futures io Trading Community Traders Hideout > Sleazy business: CISPA ‘pushed by spy & tech companies for profit'

April 19, 2012

Upcoming Webinars and Events

Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432,
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts