(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors – all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you don’t need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:

We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.

We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.

We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.

We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.

We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free and simple.

I can't let this go.... I found it yesterday and that is the most fun I had all week. I haven't seen so much confusion among seemingly competent people since the Monty Hall problem (which Hotch said he would introduce later).

I think problems like this is a great way to really grasp the concept of probability. I spent quite a bit of time on the Monty Hall problem, but it was "mind-twistingly" fun and it really intensified my interest in the subject.

I'm on my way out now, but hopefully there will be some discussion.

P.S. For the more advanced participants: What if I were to change option C to 0%?

The following user says Thank You to Lornz for this post:

Everyone agrees on this Mike, unfortunately it's not what you typed*, or what FT71 said in the webinar. It's obvious to you, but I think it's confused some members.

Will still try to post some interesting stuff to keep this thread alive though, probability is fun

This is not about probability but about paradoxes. You deviated from the subject of the thread.

If you want to discuss feedback loops you could open another thread on how the work of Kurt Gödel may be used to enhanced trader's performance.

The Monty Hall problem has nothing of a paradox. It requires just to understand the difference between an ex-ante and ex-post probability. It would well fit into this thread. I even see a direct relationship with trading. If you do your daily preparation you should put up several scenarios of what could happen during the coming trading day. Price action of the first hours will then more or less validate some of the scenarios, and you will see probabilities for the different sceanrios shifted in the same way as the opening of a door shifts the probability for the Monty Hall scenarios.

The Monty Hall thing is too simple to discuss, once you understand what a conditional probability is. It is more of a subject for self-acclaimed experts and regular's table discussions.

Last edited by Fat Tails; March 25th, 2012 at 10:32 AM.

The following 2 users say Thank You to Fat Tails for this post:

Again with the bad analogies. You need to watch the videos again. It clearly says that odds and probabilities are not the same thing. Just because you can convert one number into another, it does not change the concept. Watch the videos again and listen for the terms 'theoretical probability' and 'experimental probability'. You cannot realistically use theoretical probability in trading, you have to use experimental probability, which requires a sample base. When I said 1:2, 50%. 50/50, I was not converting odds to their implied probability, I was showing what I 'think' the logic of the original poster was (whether right or wrong) for saying that the outcome of the next trade is 50/50, I thought I made that clear in my post.

Last edited by monpere; March 25th, 2012 at 08:10 AM.

We are getting into some textbook discussions. Of course there are different concepts of probability. One is the axiomatic definition set up by Kolmogoroff in the 1920's, another one the probability based on the law of large numbers (or experimental probability) and another one is the probability based on the theoretical design of the experiment (theoretical probability).

If you get a regular die, you know that there is a probability of 1/6 for each of the possible outcomes, even if you have not tested it. So you do not need the experiment to grasp the outcome.

But again, there is no conceptual difference between the odds and the probability. Both concepts can be applied to theoretically or experimentally derived probabilities.

Do you believe you can realistically use theoretical probability (no historical analysis sample) to determine the chance of the outcome of the very next trade? This is the point I am trying to make, I think in trading only experimental probability applies (using historical sample). Theoretical probability, although it makes for a lively discussion, in terms of trading it is a waste of time. So are comparisons of trading to to coin tosses, dice rolling, Michael Jordan dunks.

Last edited by monpere; March 25th, 2012 at 09:10 AM.

I disagree with this, but I haven't got the time to answer now. I just wanted to let you know to I plan to reply when I get back, as I am sure you will appreciate it!

The question in its original form is solvable! (at least from my philosophical point of view)

Last edited by Lornz; March 25th, 2012 at 06:03 PM.
Reason: shouldn't write while overly stressed.

I think there seems some basic confusion...or most are missing like this

If we try to think of probabilities to Outcome of Trades or Coin Toss...then they are actually the probabilities of elements in their Result Sample.

RESULT SAMPLE ( Trade ) = { WIN, LOSS } 2 elements , 50% for each element in sample.

RESULT SAMPLE ( Coin Toss ) = { HEAD, TAIL } 2 elements , 50% for each element in sample.

This should be clearly distinguished from probabilities calculation generated from elements of Actual Process Sample.

ACTUAL PROCESS SAMPLE ( Trade ) = { WIN due to Profit Target, WIN due to wide stops , WIN due to small Profit Target , WIN due to abnormal spurt , .......,......,.....LOSS due to Stop, LOSS due to large profit target,...,.....,.... }

Infinite elements , probability calculation is clearly futile ...