Timothy Geithner's Bailout Legacy Not One To Be Proud Of - futures io
futures io futures trading



Timothy Geithner's Bailout Legacy Not One To Be Proud Of


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
    1. trending_up 736 views
    2. thumb_up 1 thanks given
    3. group 0 followers
    1. forum 1 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 125,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Timothy Geithner's Bailout Legacy Not One To Be Proud Of

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
Aurora, Il USA
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Trading: futures
 
kbit's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,902 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,294 given, 3,357 received

Timothy Geithner is in full "swan song" mode. Word is he will give up his job as secretary of the treasury at the end of 2012, regardless of whether President Obama wins or loses in November.

To influence history's judgment of his tenure as president of the New York Fed and as treasury secretary, he is now aggressively shaping a glowing narrative. This explains his current victory lap in the media highlighting the fourth anniversary of the bailout of Bear Stearns.

He recounts how the CEO of Bear, with his firm on the brink of bankruptcy, came to him looking for a shoulder to cry on. From his then leadership perch as president of the New York Fed, the bank ultimately extended nearly $30 billion for a bailout, the first in a series of such interventions.

Although this effort to shape a narrative has begun, the countervailing narrative is also clear. This narrative couches the bailout of Bear Stearns as the "original sin," the first in a series of short-sighted interventions with negative consequences and highlights that our system is just as vulnerable, if not more vulnerable, to similar crashes in the coming years.

Regulatory breakdowns. Since the stock market crash in 1987, the Federal Reserve, and in particular the New York Fed, has taken on a much broader role as a preventative early warning mechanism, acting as the "fire department for the financial system," in Geithner's words. Under his guidance the New York Fed was inept at filling this role. The bank was caught completely off-guard by emerging problems at Bear Stearns, AIG, Wachovia, Citibank and others.

Fear-mongering. More than any other key participant in the bailouts, Secretary Geithner was infamous for using hyperbolic language to provoke intervention. This "Chicken Little" approach undermined market confidence and likely made the panic among investors even worse.

He started the scary descriptions with testimony in April 2008 recounting his vision of what would have happened had Bear Stearns been allowed to fail: "A failure to act would have added to the risk that Americans would face lower incomes, lower home values, higher borrowing costs for housing, education, other living expenses, lower retirement savings and rising unemployment."

Of course, the bailout of Bear Stearns was no elixir, as we ultimately did face lower incomes, lower home values, lower retirement savings and rising unemployment.

Secrecy. Unwilling to come clean on the what and the why of all the bailouts, the Federal Reserve, Treasury, FDIC and Federal Housing Finance Agency went to great lengths to keep their decision-making process cloaked in secrecy. This led to more uncertainty as to the logic behind the bailouts.

Even Secretary Geithner has acknowledged the uncertainty from the ever-changing and arbitrary justifications for intervention: "(a)s the crisis intensified and more dramatic government action was required, the emergency actions meant to provide confidence and reassurance too often added to public anxiety and to investor uncertainty."
Bloomberg News had a high profile lawsuit to compel the Federal Reserve to disclose the "what" of the bailouts, ultimately prevailing at the Supreme Court and leading to the release of thousands of pages of documents.

Not on my watch. Secretary Geithner was also the lead proponent of an expansive definition of too big to fail, demanding bailouts even when others in the Federal Reserve System or at the FDIC were not so inclined. Consequently, the Wall Street Journal's David Wessel has stated that Geithner was "beginning to sound like a shill for the banks."

More recently, Secretary Geithner has lauded the Dodd-Frank bill for its ability to avoid future bailouts and accused the law's attackers of suffering from "amnesia." In fact, it takes a more serious case of amnesia to miss the fact that megainstitutions such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the banks that grew larger during the crisis were left in place by Dodd-Frank and pose the same systemic risk they did back in 2008.

Ultimately, the final judgment about Secretary Geithner's bailout strategies will be inexorably tied to the political judgment of the crisis. On that score, the outrage over the bailouts of financial institutions has helped spur not one, but two political movements.

On the right, the Tea Party saw the bailouts as a massive, unjustified intervention in our economy; and on the left, Occupy Wall Street saw the bailouts as more evidence of how rigged the political and economic system is in favor of the 1%. Both had it right and will no doubt forcefully take the argument forward that the judgment of the bailouts will be negative.


How Will History Judge The Tenure Of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner? - Investors.com

Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
If ES tracks SPX, why do support/resistance, Level 2, vo …
Emini and Emicro Index
MACD line not plotting after change of plot order
NinjaTrader
NT8 indicator to simulate a Funding Evaluation where to …
NinjaTrader
ZigZag with Depth and Backstep
EasyLanguage Programming
Help Needed: TOS Options Chain IV & IMPL MOVE Calcul …
ThinkOrSwim
 
 
(login for full post details)
  #2 (permalink)
desert CA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NT7, SC, ToS
Broker: AMP, DT, TDA
Trading: CL,NQ,YM
 
Posts: 2,134 since Jul 2011
Thanks: 2,387 given, 1,723 received

Worst treasury secretary in the modern era. How did they get someone so relatively young, inexperienced and inept and ended up being a tool for the banks and the Fed. The 2 trillion on the bailouts should have gone to the citizens. Sure, a lot of subprime folks, but they all took the risk while the banks and financial institutions got free money with almost no risk, getting away with their swaps and non-oversight by the failed regulatory authorities. Then they got two bailouts instead of consequences.

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Cloudy for this post:


futures io Trading Community Traders Hideout > Timothy Geithner's Bailout Legacy Not One To Be Proud Of


Last Updated on March 16, 2012


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!

Ongoing
 

Battlestations! Show us your trading desk - $1,500 in prizes!

March
 

Importance of Finding Your Own Way w/Adam Grimes

Elite only
 

Journal Challenge w/Jigsaw

April
     



Copyright © 2021 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts