Megaupload users to sue FBI - futures io
futures io futures trading

Megaupload users to sue FBI

Discussion in Traders Hideout

    1. trending_up 2,336 views
    2. thumb_up 0 thanks given
    3. group 0 followers
    1. forum 1 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments

Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 125,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

Search this Thread

Megaupload users to sue FBI

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
Aurora, Il USA
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Trading: futures
kbit's Avatar
Posts: 5,902 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,294 given, 3,357 received

First federal prosecutors said that the file-sharing site Megaupload was responsible for hundreds of millions of dollars worth of damage to the music and film industry.

Users of the now defunct site are making allegations of their own now too — and they want to take the FBI to court.
The US Federal Bureau of Investigation could go before a judge if critics of their shut down of the immensely popular Megaupload website have their wish.

While authorities say the site infringed on copyright after copyright, patrons of the site who used the file locker to store personal files such as work documents and private research want authorities to be held accountable for their losses.

The FBI says that Megaupload provided a service that let users navigate to the website and upload, download and share files from anywhere. Among those files, says the FBI, were pirated songs and films. Also hosted on Megaupload’s servers, however, were massive amounts of completely legitimate data created by users who did not log on to the site for illegal means.

When authorities raided the home of Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom last week and subsequently took the site offline, they created a roadblock for those that allegedly use the site to obtain copyrighted songs without permission. Also impacted though, were those who used the site to access work files and other legal documents from anywhere with an Internet connection. While the FBI’s intentions seems to be to stop illegal file sharing, by taking Megaupload offline they have also massively messed up legal file sharing as well.

“The widespread damage caused by the sudden closure of Megaupload is unjustified and completely disproportionate to the aim intended,” Sweden’s Pirate Party says.

“For this reason Pirates of Catalonia, in collaboration with Pirate Parties International and other Pirate Parties, have begun investigating these potential breaches of law and will facilitate submission of complaints against the US authorities in as many countries as possible, to ensure a positive and just result,” they add.

Before being shut down, Megaupload was at one time among the most-visited websites on the Internet and was believed to account for 4 percent of all online traffic. Authorities stopped that last Thursday when they took the service down and put its founder behind bars. Since then, Megaupload’s Kim Dotcom, a German citizen who was residing in New Zealand, has been denied bail twice.

In a statement this week, Pirate Party says that trying to get authorities in court is just the first step in showing authorities that they overstepped with their actions.

“This initiative is a starting point for legitimate Iinternet users to help defend themselves from the legal abuses promoted by those wishing to aggressively lock away cultural materials for their own financial gain,” says the group. They add that the FBI has caused “incalculable damage” by making material hosted on the site’s servers unavailable and, for now, users — both paying and non — are unsure if they will ever have their files recovered.

“[B]y closing the service they have impeded the access to millions of archives of both private individuals and organizations, potentially causing huge personal, economic and image damages to a vast number of people,” says Pirate Party. “In addition, the Pirate Party understands they may have violated Articles 197 and 198 of the Spanish Penal Code by misappropriating personal data.”

“Regardless of ideology, or opinions on the legality or morality of those running Megaupload, actions such as the closure of this service cause huge damage to lawful users of the sites and are unacceptable and disproportionate violations of their rights.”

Pirate Party has created a website where international users of Megaupload furious over the debacle can register a complaint. American users of the site, say the group, should approach the Electronic Frontier Foundation, or EFF, with their concerns.

In the meantime, several other file locker sites similar to Megaupload have followed suit and have voluntarily shut down to avoid another federal reaction on par with last week’s incidents.

Megaupload users to sue FBI — RT

Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
Automatic pattern research with NT
Elite Algorithmic NinjaTrader Trading
Help Needed: TOS Options Chain IV & IMPL MOVE Calcul …
Short Interest Ratio indicator?
MACD line not plotting after change of plot order
Data for the YM and RTY for NT8 to practice on?
(login for full post details)
  #2 (permalink)
Aurora, Il USA
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Trading: futures
kbit's Avatar
Posts: 5,902 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,294 given, 3,357 received

The US government says that Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom masterminded a vast file sharing conspiracy that swindled the entertainment industry out of millions by letting users illegally download movies and songs.

By putting Dotcom behind bars, the feds didn't just end Megaupload though, once one of the most visited sites on the Web. By ending the operation, authorities have also pulled the plug on an endeavor that was scheduled to launch later this year that could have legitimately disrupted Hollywood by letting users download songs — and rewarding the artists with compensation unheard of in the industry.

The project was already launched last year during a trial and Dotcom, born Kim Schmitz, said in December that it was met with overwhelming success. It was called Megabox, and Dotcom was intending on making it available to the public in 2012.

The site would expand on Megaupload’s file sharing service, but allow users to legally download songs, some for free, while still allowing the artists to collect compensation. It was going to be a partnership between Megaupload execs and others in the online industry, including Amazon — but it was also going to be a big thorn on the side of record labels.

The subject of allegations involving copyright infringement and illegal file sharing, Megaupload was already an opponent of the industry. Universal Music Group, the largest record company in America, had attacked Megaupload before last week’s raid of Dotcom’s New Zealand mansion and others had opposed the site as well. New revelations about Megabox suggest that it could be more than just a coincidence that the file sharing mogul was about to unleash some serious competition that would reward the musicians that are regularly raped of royalties.

"UMG knows that we are going to compete with them via our own music venture called, a site that will soon allow artists to sell their creations directly to consumers while allowing artists to keep 90 percent of earnings," Dotcom told the website Torrentfreak this past December.

Letting the artist make money? It seems to make a lot of sense but is a preposterous idea within the industry. According to research conducted by the Information Is Beautiful website, a song sold on Apple’s iTunes platform usually returns a cut of around 63 percent to the label; from there, the average musician only collects 15 percent of that figure. To say that Megabox would be a godsend to struggling artists is an understatement then, but it also could have majorly crippled the labels.

Even with hard copies of compact discs, the artists’ royalties rarely add up to 20 percent of the revenue made. Dotcom wanted to more than quadruple that by offering artists 90 cents for every dollar spent on downloading songs and even compensate them for tunes acquired for free. In a press release from last year, Dotcom even acknowledged that, “Yes that’s right, we will pay artists even for free downloads.”

Such an attitude is often absent from the music industry insiders, though. As a result, many hopes of a career in the biz have been broken after realizing that the rock and roll lifestyle isn’t oh-so obtainable. “To get to the nuts and bolts of things, unless you're Rihanna or something, you don't really make money from record sales anymore,” Mickey Melchiondo of Ween told USA Today last summer.

Over the course of more than two decades, Ween released more than a dozen albums and toured internationally several times over, but the guitarist says that royalties are rare. ''I don't have sympathy for the record companies,'' Melchiondo told the New York Times in 2003.

''They haven't been paying me royalties anyway.'' After a slew of releases on the major labels, the band began recording and releasing albums on their own. Now when he isn’t performing, Melchiondo, 41, subsidizes his income by offering fishing trips on board his own boat. If you don’t buy a Ween record, you can support the band by spending a few hundred dollars to fish for striped bass with Captain Melchiondo in the Atlantic.

Before they were shut-down, Dotcom said,“You can expect several Megabox announcements next year including exclusive deals with artists who are eager to depart from outdated business models. Instead though, the only news fans of Megaupload and its now famous founder got was that one of the biggest sites on the Web was wiped off the map.

Authorities raided Dotcom’s house last Thursday and he has been denied bail twice since. American officials arrested several people that they say were involved in the conspiracy much to the dismay of Megaupload’s fans. Hours after the news broke last week, a massive online campaign waged by hacktivists with Anonymous and other Internet collectives targeted Universal and others.

Within hours, the websites for UMG and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) were taken offline after a massive distributed denial of service attack, or DDoS. The websites of the FBI, US Copyright Office and the US Department of Justice were also taken down in the assault.

Attorneys writing for the Crime in the Suites website wrote of the FBI’s indictment of Dotcom that it is “riddled with inconsistencies,” and others have suggested that it was a matter of the federal government using the case to make an example of Megaupload. Other sites that use file-sharing voluntarily shut down after the raid in fear that they would be the next to be targeted by law enforcement.

With Washington calling the shots — and getting money for that ammo by way of Hollywood — they might have been very right in packing up. In 2002, then Universal Chairman Edgar Bronfman Jr. donated $10,000 towards the reelection campaign for Democratic California Governor Gray Davis and similar contributions by way of industry-aligned PACs have continued in the ten years since.

Former Senator Chris Dodd left his position in Congress to take a $1.2 million-a-year job as lobbyist for the Motion Picture Association of America, who was also targeted in the Anonymous-led raid. In 2009, the MPAA lobbied Congress to the tune of $1.66 million. Hollywood also handed President Obama $3.5 million during his 2008 campaign. General Electric, which lists Universal Music and other Hollywood entities among its subsidiaries, spent $84.35 million in lobbying between 2008 and 2010.

Did Kim Dotcom break the law by operating Megaupload? Maybe yes and maybe no. But when those laws are made and enforced by people in the pockets of Hollywood, you can imagine that Washington isn’t exactly interested in hearing what Megaupload has to say in their defense. Even less likely, however, would be letting Dotcom finally put some money in the pockets of musicians.

Did the music industry set-up Megaupload to be shut down? — RT

Started this thread Reply With Quote

futures io Trading Community Traders Hideout > Megaupload users to sue FBI

Last Updated on January 27, 2012

Upcoming Webinars and Events

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!


Battlestations! Show us your trading desk - $1,500 in prizes!


Importance of Finding Your Own Way w/Adam Grimes

Elite only

Journal Challenge w/Jigsaw


Copyright © 2021 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432,
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts