U.S. Regulators Embrace Plan to End Reliance on Credit Ratings Firms - futures io
futures io futures trading



U.S. Regulators Embrace Plan to End Reliance on Credit Ratings Firms


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
    1. trending_up 980 views
    2. thumb_up 0 thanks given
    3. group 0 followers
    1. forum 0 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 125,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

U.S. Regulators Embrace Plan to End Reliance on Credit Ratings Firms

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
Aurora, Il USA
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Trading: futures
 
kbit's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,902 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,294 given, 3,357 received

U.S. regulators are embracing a plan devised by the Paris-based Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development that would assign zero risk to most European government debt.

Required by Congress to remove credit ratings from banking rules, regulators from the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency proposed rules last month that would set bank capital levels using classifications made by the OECD.

The OECD, two-thirds of whose members are European Union countries, considers most EU sovereign bonds to be risk-free, including those of Greece and Portugal.

But the proposal undermines the intent of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, which sought to eliminate the use of ratings by companies paid by the entities they rate. Because the OECD represents its member governments, there is an inherent bias in its dealings.

Still, to find an alternative to credit ratings where there are no conflicts of any kind is almost impossible, says Luigi De Ghengi, a partner at law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP in New York, who believes regulators are only replacing one set of conflicts with another.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in 2009 laid out new global capital rules that would increase the amount banks are required to keep on hand in order to back mortgage-linked securities and other complicated products at the heart of the 2008 financial crisis. The December 7 proposal is part of the U.S. effort to implement those rules.

The so-called market-risk rules were supposed to be in place by the end of 2011 — an EU version went into effect on December 31 — but Dodd-Frank’s credit-ratings ban slowed the process in the U.S., where regulators ultimately devised a plan that would bar ratings from firms like Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s.

The U.S. proposal would allow regulators to increase risk weightings for nations that have defaulted on their debt within the past five years. Voluntary restructurings would be considered as default, resulting in a jump in risk weighting, but until then would stay at zero.

U.S. regulators, recognizing the weakness of the OECD’s proposed ratings, added the debt-restructuring provision and suggested using market indicators such as bond yields and credit-default swap spreads to complement them. However, such market indicators strip out short-term volatility, making it unlikely they would capture increasing risk before it was too late.

The December 7 proposal also contains formulas for determining the riskiness of securitizations, correlating risk weightings with the hierarchy of tranches: If a bond is lower in the order of receiving payments and among the first to get hit by losses when loans in the package start defaulting, it would be assigned a higher risk, just as was the case under the Moody’s and S&P methodologies.

Basel III rules also rely on credit ratings for calculating how much capital banks must keep on hand to protect against losses on securities and bonds on their balance sheets. The Fed, FDIC, and OCC, which are trying to devise a proposal by the end of March for how to implement Basel III, will have to find an approach that avoids relying on credit rating firms.

Unless regulators object, the new Basel rules, like the current ones, will continue to allow the largest banks to use their own internal models to assign risk to assets, including Greek bonds. The U.S. never implemented the earlier framework, known as Basel II, which was adopted by the EU in 2006. Basel III rules are supposed to go into effect globally starting in 2013.


U.S. Regulators Embrace Plan to End Reliance on Credit Ratings Firms (NYSEARCA:EWG, NYSEARCA:EWQ, NYSEARCA:EWP, NYSEARCA:EWD, NYSEARCA:EWI, NYSEARCA:EWK, NYSEARCA:EWL, NYSEARCA:EWN, NYSEARCA:EWO, NYSEARCA:EWU, NYSE:EWG, NYSE:EWQ, NYSE:EWP, NYSE:EWD,

Started this thread Reply With Quote


futures io Trading Community Traders Hideout > U.S. Regulators Embrace Plan to End Reliance on Credit Ratings Firms


Last Updated on January 3, 2012


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!

Ongoing
 

Battlestations! Show us your trading desk - $1,500 in prizes!

March
 

Importance of Finding Your Own Way w/Adam Grimes

Elite only
 

Journal Challenge w/Jigsaw

April
     



Copyright © 2021 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts