NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





No charts, Indicators, etc. Am I Naive?


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one skinlanta with 23 posts (3 thanks)
    2. looks_two Nasdin94 with 13 posts (6 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Jigsaw Trading with 10 posts (11 thanks)
    4. looks_4 kevv with 6 posts (4 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one trendisyourfriend with 3 thanks per post
    2. looks_two Jigsaw Trading with 1.1 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 kevv with 0.7 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Nasdin94 with 0.5 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 41,985 views
    2. thumb_up 50 thanks given
    3. group 15 followers
    1. forum 87 posts
    2. attach_file 3 attachments




 
Search this Thread

No charts, Indicators, etc. Am I Naive?

  #61 (permalink)
skinlanta
atlanta,ga
 
Posts: 25 since Oct 2011
Thanks Given: 20
Thanks Received: 4

@tigertrader.......I understand exactly what u are saying.......Am focusing on a few "tools" and using these in ym vs. oil right now. Bankroll definitely influences the strategy u must employ. Beginning to recognize certain signals which I never would have even thought of before. Appreciate the "plain truth" advice

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Exit Strategy
NinjaTrader
NexusFi Journal Challenge - April 2024
Feedback and Announcements
My NT8 Volume Profile Split by Asian/Euro/Open
NinjaTrader
Online prop firm The Funded Trader (TFT) going under?
Traders Hideout
Build trailing stop for micro index(s)
Psychology and Money Management
 
  #62 (permalink)
 
Trader Duck's Avatar
 Trader Duck 
Fairbanks, Alaska
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP/CQG & Kinetic
Trading: CL, GC, NQ
Posts: 71 since Jun 2010
Thanks Given: 130
Thanks Received: 78


skinlanta View Post
Hey All, Happy to be a a part of this group and am appreciating the info I am receiving. My question to the seasoned vets is this:

I have been practicing trading for about a year...simply on paper......... I have recently made the decision to set up an account and actually make some real money. I have always just watched the ups and downs of the market (oil), considered relevent news if applicable, and made decisions to go long or short.....if i start losing i either go long or short agn in the same direction.......of course i have taken some losses doing this, but I have definitely had more winners. with all the indicators, charts, etc out there that people use and the fact that most ppl lose at this, am i naive to think that i can be successful without going that route? My buddy is assuring me that I have to educate myself more......any thoughts?

I'd like to add some humor to the discussion. I also like metaphors and I just came up with one.

The Old Farmer: The old farmer goes outside and looks around to gauge the weather. He looks as far as his eyes can see. He checks for clouds and the wind in the trees. Maybe he consults the Farmer's Almanac or holds a wet finger in the air. But that is all he knows; he has no other tools.
Then he decides whether it is time to get the hay in the barn.

The Weatherman: The weatherman has Indicators. He looks at the Baraometer, Temperature, Humidity, and Doppler Radar etc. to decide on the weather.

Now who do you suppose gets it right most often? Who would you consult if you were pouring concrete? -Quack-

To me, the Macd bbs is like Doppler Radar to the weatherman. It is absolutely NOT a lagging indicator. If you know how to read the subtle signals, you can predicat price movement as accuratley as a weatherman can predict the weather. The weatherman is not always right, but when he says 100% chance of rain, we usually get wet. A good farmer can do surprisingly well. If he sees the leaves fluttering from dark to light, and dark again, he knows he'd better get the hay in the barn soon. The leaves flutter and change color because the wind is swirling in two directions; it is the boarder between a high and low pressure area. A low pressure area is moving in and it's going to rain. Pretty crafty farmer. But I prefer to have doppler radar on the screen so I can see where the low pressure area came from, how big it is, and and what path it is taking. I'd also check to see if the humidity is getting high. My wet finger isn't that accurate. But that's just me and I could be all quacked up.

Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)
skinlanta
atlanta,ga
 
Posts: 25 since Oct 2011
Thanks Given: 20
Thanks Received: 4


hey Daffy......whats the macd bbs indicator??

@Trader Duck

Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)
skinlanta
atlanta,ga
 
Posts: 25 since Oct 2011
Thanks Given: 20
Thanks Received: 4

@Trader Duck


Found them.........

Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)
 
Trader Duck's Avatar
 Trader Duck 
Fairbanks, Alaska
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP/CQG & Kinetic
Trading: CL, GC, NQ
Posts: 71 since Jun 2010
Thanks Given: 130
Thanks Received: 78


skinlanta View Post
hey Daffy......whats the macd bbs indicator??

@ Trader Duck

Oh, I'm sorry. I meant to include a chart. The Macd bb lines indicator is a Macd with dots on close (the bbs). The 9 EMA signal line and Histogram are taken out, and Bollinger Bands added. It is free on this site. Fat Tails did a wonderful job on one. He calls it MACD BB Lines V3 . I think I saw a version 4 also. As far as I know the combination of Macd and Bollinger Bands was 1st put together by Nexgen in about 1998. It is part of thier software package, which I have. The Nexgen site has manuals and videos for free that explain some of the signals. The best signals, though, are the ones taught by New Futures Trading, but that site is shut down right now. Here is a charts showing differnt codes written and how they look. Some are here on the forum.
-Duck-

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	MacD Comparison.PNG
Views:	221
Size:	148.7 KB
ID:	54159  
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)
 
Lornz's Avatar
 Lornz 
Oslo, Norway
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: CQG, Excel
Trading: CL
Posts: 1,193 since Apr 2010


Trader Duck View Post
I'd like to add some humor to the discussion. I also like metaphors and I just came up with one.

The Old Farmer: The old farmer goes outside and looks around to gauge the weather. He looks as far as his eyes can see. He checks for clouds and the wind in the trees. Maybe he consults the Farmer's Almanac or holds a wet finger in the air. But that is all he knows; he has no other tools.
Then he decides whether it is time to get the hay in the barn.

The Weatherman: The weatherman has Indicators. He looks at the Baraometer, Temperature, Humidity, and Doppler Radar etc. to decide on the weather.

Now who do you suppose gets it right most often? Who would you consult if you were pouring concrete? -Quack-

To me, the Macd bbs is like Doppler Radar to the weatherman. It is absolutely NOT a lagging indicator. If you know how to read the subtle signals, you can predicat price movement as accuratley as a weatherman can predict the weather. The weatherman is not always right, but when he says 100% chance of rain, we usually get wet. A good farmer can do surprisingly well. If he sees the leaves fluttering from dark to light, and dark again, he knows he'd better get the hay in the barn soon. The leaves flutter and change color because the wind is swirling in two directions; it is the boarder between a high and low pressure area. A low pressure area is moving in and it's going to rain. Pretty crafty farmer. But I prefer to have doppler radar on the screen so I can see where the low pressure area came from, how big it is, and and what path it is taking. I'd also check to see if the humidity is getting high. My wet finger isn't that accurate. But that's just me and I could be all quacked up.

I like your analogy, but I'd rather use other "indicators" than a squiqqly line.

Weather forecasting involves mathematical models that looks at various atmospheric factors, that is quite different from what a MACD does.

A MACD is just another way of filtering the same time series one views as a chart. I would argue that some people intuitively model the series equally accurate, possibly even better, than a simple indicator. If one decides to do some quantitative analysis, a rigorous statistical framework is much better!

That being said, if it works for you -- then that's great.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)
 
Jigsaw Trading's Avatar
 Jigsaw Trading  Jigsaw Trading is an official Site Sponsor
 
Posts: 2,988 since Nov 2010
Thanks Given: 831
Thanks Received: 10,393


Nasdin94 View Post
Mmmkay,

1.There is a huge difference between investing and gambling.
2.The fool that bought the price at a higher price was probably trading based on a higher timeframe and that it had hit an area which he deemed that the trend is up.

I still like to emphasize on R:R when trading, it helps to cover your next losses so you'll still be in profit in the long term, isn't that how we traders earn money? Making sure that our wins are more than our losses?


I agree with you - there is a huge difference between investing and gambling. Still - I'm a day trader. There is a huge difference between investing and day trading. Day trading is much closer to gambling that it is to investing.

The problem with R:R & a win percentage, it presumes totally passive trade management. I don't know a single profitable trader that is passive in their trade management. It also doesn't consider trade frequency, slippage and commissions.

Theoretically, a 1 unit stop and an 2 unit target requires a 33% win rate to break even.
- If you have any slippage the win rate must be raised
- If you ever cut a trade before the target, the win rate must be raised
- If the 2 units was an ES tick, your commissions would be 16% of your profit on a winner, the win rate must be raised
- If the 2 units was an ES point, your commissions would be 4% of your profit on a winner, the win rate must be raised

In face, the one thing you can guarantee is that if you have a 1:2 R:R, a 33% win rate will definitely cause you to lose money. So - the theory that 1:2 needs a 33% win rate is somewhat trampled upon by the fact that a 1:2 R:R and a 33% win rate will be guaranteed to see your account bleeding dollaroonies.

I do agree that it's nice to consider where the market may go before you enter a trade but the "R:R" metric is abused heavily on trading forums.

One thing that I found very useful was to set up a random entry system and play with the R:R. In all cases the system broke even (without slippage, commissions of course), regardless of what happened to the %winners which was adjusted automatically by the R:R adjustment. The R:R adjustment does the same thing to non-random entry systems too.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)
rwhitt
Austin, TX
 
Posts: 80 since Nov 2011
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Received: 9

the challenge will be how you feel and how you make decisions while the money is actually draining from the account. I recommend you do it, go live. Stop simming, but, at all costs, pay attention to how you feel. That is the key to winning. You have to pay attention to how you feel before, during and after a trade. Simming won't give you that feedback. Winning real money and more importantly, losing real hard cash, that is where it's at. After all I have spent and done over the years, the most important thing I bought is training on how to read emotion while trading. It is all about emotion and the accurate interpretion of emotion. All the other stuff is not very useful. The key is in how you feel and how you make decisions in emotion.

Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)
Nasdin94
Singapore, Jurong West
 
Posts: 128 since Oct 2011
Thanks Given: 11
Thanks Received: 114


DionysusToast View Post
I agree with you - there is a huge difference between investing and gambling. Still - I'm a day trader. There is a huge difference between investing and day trading. Day trading is much closer to gambling that it is to investing.

The problem with R:R & a win percentage, it presumes totally passive trade management. I don't know a single profitable trader that is passive in their trade management. It also doesn't consider trade frequency, slippage and commissions.

Theoretically, a 1 unit stop and an 2 unit target requires a 33% win rate to break even.
- If you have any slippage the win rate must be raised
- If you ever cut a trade before the target, the win rate must be raised
- If the 2 units was an ES tick, your commissions would be 16% of your profit on a winner, the win rate must be raised
- If the 2 units was an ES point, your commissions would be 4% of your profit on a winner, the win rate must be raised

In face, the one thing you can guarantee is that if you have a 1:2 R:R, a 33% win rate will definitely cause you to lose money. So - the theory that 1:2 needs a 33% win rate is somewhat trampled upon by the fact that a 1:2 R:R and a 33% win rate will be guaranteed to see your account bleeding dollaroonies.

I do agree that it's nice to consider where the market may go before you enter a trade but the "R:R" metric is abused heavily on trading forums.

One thing that I found very useful was to set up a random entry system and play with the R:R. In all cases the system broke even (without slippage, commissions of course), regardless of what happened to the %winners which was adjusted automatically by the R:R adjustment. The R:R adjustment does the same thing to non-random entry systems too.


Hmm, the premise that you used for the RR system failing is only valid if the R:R of trades remain constant throughout the system.

There are still times where a trader can adjust his R:R to higher levels like 1:9 if he sees that the trade will go for the long run therefore, the 33% rule does not apply anymore as it is only subtle if your R:R is constant at 1:2


The trader could have also chosen to ignore trades which only accomplishes 1:2 or 1:1 RR.

Like you, I'm also a day trader but unlike you, I don't pay for comissions or have any slippages as I'm into Forex.

Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)
 
trendisyourfriend's Avatar
 trendisyourfriend 
Quebec Canada
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP/CQG
Trading: ES, NQ, YM
Frequency: Daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 4,527 since Oct 2009
Thanks Given: 4,171
Thanks Received: 6,018



Nasdin94 View Post
...Like you, I'm also a day trader but unlike you, I don't pay for comissions or have any slippages as I'm into Forex.

Are you sure ? never heard the term spread. Look at the average spread on Oanda:
https://fxtrade.oanda.com/why/spreads/recent

Reply With Quote




Last Updated on July 6, 2018


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts